Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,182–4,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 10:41
4,270
-14
12 Sept 2026, 03:41
4,284
+12
8 Sept 2026, 02:59
4,272
+1
3 Sept 2026, 10:02
4,271
-8
31 Aug 2026, 01:24
4,279
+11
28 Aug 2026, 10:58
4,268
+12
25 Aug 2026, 01:13
4,256
+12
21 Aug 2026, 03:17
4,244
-2
17 Aug 2026, 19:47
4,246
+22
14 Aug 2026, 15:28
4,224
+12
11 Aug 2026, 00:54
4,212
+15
7 Aug 2026, 22:51
4,197
+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:17
4,195
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
57 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
23
40.4%
❤🔥
17
29.8%
❤
4
7.02%
💯
4
7.02%
🙏
3
5.26%
🏆
2
3.51%
👍
2
3.51%
😁
1
1.75%
🤯
1
1.75%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akapustyanov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Записал для вас мощный
МАСТЕР КЛАСС🔥
➖Показал, как с нуля собрать ролик уровня рекламы Формулы-1 — прямо в нейросетях, без камеры и съёмочной группы. Один ноутбук и несколько нейронок.
Внутри разобрал⤵️
🟠как за полгода нейросети сделали скачок в качестве
🟠три инструмента, на которых держится весь процесс
🟠как придумать идею, сгенерить и собрать ролик
🟠живые кейсы ребят, которые начали с нуля и уже берут заказы
▶️…
Уже мои тесты Сиданс 2.5
Видео 30 секунд по одному промту.
Выглядит довольно хорошо,а с учетом отстутсвия монтажа и другой работы это выход на новый уровень создания контента.
И меня порой поражает как люди могут игнорировать или незамечать такой крутой инструмент.
Бонус для вас
На днях выходит Seedance 2.5 🔥
Судя по тому, что показали разработчики, обновление будет очень интересным. На видео выше — официальые примеры.
Что зацепило меня больше всего:
• Видео до 30 секунд одним кадром. Не набор коротких генераций, а полноценная сцена с движением камеры. Если качество действительно будет на уровне — это уже можно использовать в реальных проектах.
• До 50 референсов в одном запросе. Можно з…
Крутейший визуал в ИИ
Подготовил инструкцию для вас, как сделать такой же c cобой или вашими клиентами.
Важно, естественно необходимо адаптировать промтп под вашу задачу.
Инструкция https://neurocreator2.ru/knight/
📢 Почему у одних получается зарабатывать на ИИ, а у других — просто коллекция промптов
Смотрю на это уже БОЛЬШЕ ГОДА и вижу одну и ту же картину.
2️⃣ человека.
Одинаковый доступ к нейросетям, одни и те же уроки, одни и те же инструменты.
✔️Один через месяц показывает первые работы и берёт заказы
✖️Второй — по-прежнему собирает промпты, сохраняет гайды «на потом» и так и не начинает.
Разница не в инструменте. Инст…
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что меня останавливало годами❓
Честно?
🔘Не отсутствие знаний.
🔘И не нехватка времени.
⚠️⚠️
Меня останавливало убеждение, что я должен быть готов на 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ процентов, прежде чем что-то показать.
📌 Я мог месяцами доводить трек и так его и не выложить. Мог придумать идею и похоронить её, потому что «получится не идеально».
Это называется перфекционизм, и звучит почти как комплимент. А на деле это очень удобный спо…
💡 Почему я вообще во всё это влез❓❓❓
Пару лет назад моя жизнь выглядела так:
Работа - музыка музыка - работа
Постоянный стресс и самобичевание что я зря трачу время
Я вставал утром и не мог ответить на простой вопрос — а зачем я вообще всё это делаю.
Это была апатия. Когда ты вроде что-то делаешь, стараешься, но результата нет
А что ещё хуже - это постоянное сравнивание себя с другими
🔘те кто уже пришли к результат…
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📢 Я начинаю кое-что большое. И хочу сделать это вместе с вами
Последние недели я готовлю самое серьёзное, что делал за этот год 📈
И знаете, что я понял?
⚠️⚠️
Раньше я бы закрылся, ушёл в работу на пару месяцев, а потом вышел и сказал: 〰️Смотрите, что я сделал〰️
В этот раз хочу иначе.
Я хочу собрать это вместе с вами⤵️
Показывать процесс, спрашивать, слушать. Потому что делаю не для галочки, а для конкретных людей…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @akapustyanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Киселёва тут | AI • режиссура • портфолио @kiselevatut · 23,096 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
Кирилл Потапов l REELS ACADEMY @ReelsAcademyPotapovfx · 94,090 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Музыка Без Авторских прав / для Видео @music_creative · 37,888 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Канал интенсивов от Ронина @artemronin · 32,452 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Немонтаж | (Movlat Dadaew) @nmntzh · 25,833 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
KHS — Фабрика Творцов @khsfilms · 36,006 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Музыка для видео @BGmusica · 36,160 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Звуки для видео @sounds_pack · 25,742 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Кирилл Артамонов @artamonov_proreels · 25,178 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Панкратова покоряет США @pankratova916 · 22,632 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
LISTOPADOV | Монтаж видео @listopadov_video · 22,063 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Яна ProDesign @prodlx · 48,467 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Музыка для видео @music_for_video · 44,526 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Капустьянов Александр | Akapustyanov” (@akapustyanov), 4,270 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akapustyanov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.