Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Немонтаж | (Movlat Dadaew)

Channel

Немонтаж | (Movlat Dadaew)

@nmntzh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,000subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002090758565
TypeChannel
Username@nmntzh
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nmntzh

Growth

25,99826,17726,087.57 August 2026 — 26,177 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,177 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,172 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,164 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,136 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,124 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,122 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,090 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,081 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,069 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,060 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,052 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,053 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,054 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,043 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,028 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,016 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,032 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,016 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,014 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,004 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,001 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,998 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,000 subscribers26,0007 August 20263 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 27 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,971–26,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 12:2026,000+2
2 Sept 2026, 05:4225,998-3
1 Sept 2026, 04:4426,001-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:1226,004-10
30 Aug 2026, 09:3526,014-2
29 Aug 2026, 08:3426,016-16
28 Aug 2026, 05:0326,032+16
25 Aug 2026, 22:0726,016-12
24 Aug 2026, 19:3726,028-15
23 Aug 2026, 02:4626,043-11
21 Aug 2026, 18:1926,054+1
20 Aug 2026, 18:2326,053+1
19 Aug 2026, 17:1426,052-8
18 Aug 2026, 18:5226,060-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:4726,069-12
16 Aug 2026, 16:4826,081-9
14 Aug 2026, 22:3326,090-32
13 Aug 2026, 12:4726,122-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:3226,124-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:5226,127first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.38%
avg views ÷ 26,000 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,440
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.779%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held22 (9 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total21,940
Reactions total171
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 04s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

455 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥23551.6%
18841.3%
custom 5253562197845486236327.03%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 455 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 22 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nmntzh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,810 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Кто гонится за просмотрами- быстро сгорает. Кто просто делает в кайф - выстреливает. Первый садится за монтаж с мыслью «сейчас налутаю просмотров и денег». Месяц не залетает, второй - и он полностью забивает либо пропадает на несколько месяцев. Второй просто делает то, что нравится. Не зашло - ладно, «не ради больших просмотров я это делал», делает дальше. Зашло - получает буст: подписчиков, лиды, заказы. Пример -

🔥164

25 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,450 views12 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

За 10 дней 30к - это норм или не норм? Так мне написал Тимур, ученик 7 потока. Он реально не понимал - много это или мало для его уровня. 10 роликов за 10 дней, по 3.000 за каждый. На ролик уходило 3-4 часа. Если считать в месяц - это темп под 90к. И это человек, который буквально месяц назад закончил обучение, без раскрученного профиля и без базы клиентов. Который до этого делал только 10к в месяц. Как думаете, нор

9🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,920 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

13 РОЛИКОВ БЕЗ МОНТАЖА со спикерами - для практики. @makazhoM1 сделал мощный подгон. И зацените его работу. Верите, что на компе он начал работать только в декабре? Какой уровень ? 🔥

🔥215

17 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈3,060 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

МОНТАЖ ЗА 500 РУБЛЕЙ. Вакансия из чата +/-2.000₽ за ролик, скинул ученику. Неплохие деньги за несложную работу. Через время пишет ученик: «Заказ забрал другой, он за 500 делает». Я вспомнил видео Артёма Сенаторова про работу с ценой и в шутку сказал ученику написать заказчику: «Маленькая цена - это единственное, что вы ищете?» Его ответ: «смотрю цена-качество». Ладно, думаю, посмотрим на это качество за 500 рублей.

28🔥11

13 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,860 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вы бы поверили, что этот ролик сделал человек, который до курса ни разу не работал в этой сфере? 👆🏻 Даже мобильного монтажа толком не было - пару раз резал видео на телефоне для себя. Это работа @Abattik. Не заказ, а самостоятельная практика , оттачивал навык после обучения. Коммерческие работы его я показывал чуть раньше. 8 недель - и вот такой уровень. Его отзыв Хочу оставить отзыв об обучении Мовлата. Сразу ск

🔥155

13 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,510 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сделал шаблон-сетку с основными соотношениями сторон. Один слой, куча настроек - растягивается и подгоняется под себя за пару кликов. Накинул на кадр - сразу видно, как впишется под нужный формат: экран телефона, превью в Инсте, сторис и т.д. Растянул на весь экран, добавил линии - получилась разметочная сетка. Удобно для композиции, выравнивания элементов, монтажа. Можно проанимировать и юзать как UI-анимацию. Пр

🔥86

9 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈3,140 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Посоветуйте клавиатуру) Эта топ, но мне не подходит - слишком вытянутые клавиши

9🔥4

3 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈4,230 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Это делали Абат, Ахмед, Тимур, Аманов - 7 поток, еще месяца нет после выпуска, а уже такие работы🔥

🔥21custom 525356219784548623642

28 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC≈4,350 views9 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

6🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,920 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nmntzh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KHS — Фабрика Творцов
@khsfilms · 36,168
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Всё для видеомонтажа
@dzhmaterials · 33,903
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 September 2026
Музыка для видео
@BGmusica · 36,431
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Музыка для видео
@music_for_video · 44,582
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Музыка Без Авторских прав / для Видео
@music_creative · 37,992
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Кирилл Потапов l REELS ACADEMY
@ReelsAcademyPotapovfx · 92,499
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
SteosVoice CIS
@steosvoice · 467,038
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
ChatPlace
@chatplaceio · 50,974
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Немонтаж | (Movlat Dadaew)” (@nmntzh), 26,000 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nmntzh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.