Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя шла и нашла

Channel

Настя шла и нашла

@devochki_na

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,926subscribers

-525 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699084591
TypeChannel
Username@devochki_na
DescriptionИнтроверт - шопоголик с тремя дипломами ищет вещи и находит. Вэлкам, девочки. По сотрудничеству: @Nelli11 Написать мне: @GatskoeDetko В перечне РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6737869223bfbf2cbf45d729&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created7 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/devochki_na

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,92650,45150,188.56 August 2026 — 50,451 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,423 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,402 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,406 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,401 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,359 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,341 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,306 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,238 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,214 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,177 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,134 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,115 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,108 subscribers23 August 2026 — 50,058 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,005 subscribers25 August 2026 — 49,979 subscribers26 August 2026 — 49,958 subscribers27 August 2026 — 49,955 subscribers28 August 2026 — 49,935 subscribers29 August 2026 — 49,932 subscribers30 August 2026 — 49,926 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -525. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,847–50,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:0349,926-6
29 Aug 2026, 11:2549,932-3
28 Aug 2026, 13:1249,935-20
27 Aug 2026, 14:4349,955-3
26 Aug 2026, 18:1249,958-21
25 Aug 2026, 20:5249,979-26
24 Aug 2026, 23:4450,005-53
23 Aug 2026, 08:0850,058-50
21 Aug 2026, 16:2250,108-7
20 Aug 2026, 16:3750,115-19
19 Aug 2026, 20:0350,134-43
18 Aug 2026, 22:2450,177-37
17 Aug 2026, 20:2450,214-24
16 Aug 2026, 20:1350,238-23
15 Aug 2026, 08:2450,261-45
14 Aug 2026, 01:4850,306-35
11 Aug 2026, 20:4250,341-18
10 Aug 2026, 22:5450,359-42
9 Aug 2026, 23:3150,401-5
8 Aug 2026, 21:1250,406first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.74%
avg views ÷ 49,926 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,870
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held85 (5 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total243,650
Reactions total17,215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,500
Videos
1,550
Links
2,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19m 21s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,448 reactions across 80 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,76347.2%
😁2,99118.2%
🔥2,45915.0%
😍7294.43%
💯5733.48%
3712.26%
🤣2541.54%
🤪2221.35%
🍾1590.967%
❤‍🔥1350.821%
🍓1180.717%
🤝1180.717%
👀1160.705%
💔880.535%
🤩760.462%
👏610.371%
💘370.225%
🦄370.225%
😭360.219%
😘270.164%
11 further kinds780.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 85 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @devochki_na. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.35%
2 of 85 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,570
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,960
over 83 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjc8iQ1R120 August 202620 August 2026
2SDnjeu4UsM111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,140 views142 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Последние выходные лета решили провести на ферме альпак ❤️ Утро началось прекрасно. Младшая обиделась, что средняя не дала ей стул. Ударила среднюю. Средняя ударила младшую. Обе орали. Алиса переоделась раз десять, потому что всё «некрасиииииво!». У машины дети не поделили, кто сядет первым. Я поорала на всех. Кристофф поорал на нас, потому что его с собой не берут. Наконец сели. Поехали. По дороге младшую тошнило

104🔥15🦄15😍6👏1💯1

29 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,490 views128 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

В моём полку любимых авторов прибыло. Любимыми я называю писателей, у которых после одной-двух книг хочется не выбирать следующее произведение по отзывам, а просто найти библиографию и методично прочитать ВСЁ. От корки до корки. С Ольгой Громыко у меня именно так. Поэтому сегодня мы не смотрим, а читаем цикл «Год Крысы». Две книги, которые я проглотила подряд и теперь очень завидую тем, кто ещё не начинал. В цент

🍓513430🔥11❤‍🔥1😍1

28 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,730 views135 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, сказочная стадия моего гардероба вышла из-под контроля. Сначала кокошник. Теперь вот ремень с Царевной-Лебедью. «Месяц под косой блестит» пока не завезли, зато золотые крылья уже на месте. Ну какая красота всамделишная! Смотришь, и где-то автоматически начинают плескаться волны, а из моря выходят тридцать три богатыря. Осталось уговорить князя Гвидона Алексея, чтобы он всё это оплатил 😬

95😁29🔥8😍3

28 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈2,840 views233 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Вы ждали этого дня, и я тоже его ждала! День, когда #луковые_девочки приносят нам себя красивых и нарядных. День, когда мы коллективно любуемся образами и берём себе на карандаш самые самые. День, когда мы ставим ❤️ и отправляем новые образы! Одним словом, луковая пятница

151🔥52🍓16👏7🤩4🥰3

28 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,630 views137 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Последние два сезона дизайнеры придумали, что просто перьев нам уже недостаточно. Теперь они должны торчать над одеждой на тоненьких проволках и слегка подрагивать при ходьбе. Love Republic подсмотрел этот трюк и выпустил джемпер с такими же перьями. Выглядит странно. Поэтому, разумеется, мне нравится. А вам? 😊

76🔥32😁16😍11🤝2

28 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈2,820 views175 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Рассказывайте, успели всё, что напланировали на лето?😆

😁107💯45😭147🤝1🤪1

27 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈3,090 views200 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Целых три недели мы пропускали рубрику #шопинг_сарафан! Поэтому я надеюсь, что за три недели вы накупили всякого красивого и нужного, и очень хотите этим поделиться в комментариях! Ссылки обязательны, фото по желанию ❤️

😁116🔥4830💯5💅1

27 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈2,760 views160 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Не хочу быть душной, но праздник к нам приходит, праздник к нам приходит 💝 Да, в августе. Да, я всё понимаю. Но фразу «готовь сани летом» явно придумал человек, который однажды попытался купить новогодний декор в декабре и увидел цены. Я на его стороне. Поэтому, пока нормальные люди доедают арбузы, я уже насобирала для вас на Яндекс Маркете большую подборку всякого красивого новогоднего. Особенно советую посмотрет

87🔥29🍾20😁13😢73👀1

27 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈2,120 views72 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Любителям впрыгивать в последний школьный вагон посвящается! Очень красивая школьная коллекция получилась у MAAG. Настолько красивая, что, видимо, на выходных нас с Алисой ждёт головокружительный шопинг. Из того, на что я уже положила глаз: • юбка-шорты. Алиса терпеть не может шорты, но в юбках сидит так, будто понятия «приличия» ещё не проходили. Поэтому идеальный компромисс: ей — юбка, мне — спокойная нервная си

48🔥14😁9🤝1

27 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈2,210 views121 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

А вот эта идея вам точно понравится! Я взяла и повторила этот трюк со старым подоконником и ну какава красота получилась 🟡

🔥7524👏8😍84👌2

26 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,640 views154 reactionsread 27 August 2026

У старшей выпал зуб. Алиса торжественно известила об этом всех присутствующих, сообщила, что теперь ждёт зубную фею и подарок от неё. Перед сном младшая, некоторое время переваривавшая вопиющую несправедливость этого мира, спрашивает: — А почему фея только Алисе подарки дарит, а мне нет? Она какая-то жадина! Нет, Аделиночка, фея не жадная. Фея просто ещё не запомнила, что в многодетной семье один выпавший зуб опл

😁117💯15🔥126🤝4

26 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,220 views225 reactions3 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Каждый год примерно в конце августа я начинаю хотеть осень. Такую красивую, человеческую, адекватную осень, когда можно накинуть жакет, тренч, бомбер и наконец выгулять все эти прекрасные верхние слои, которые я зачем-то продолжаю покупать. И каждый год Краснодар отвечает: не сегодня. В сентябре ещё пекло. 10 октября всё ещё жара. А 11 октября ты просыпаешься, и всё, давай доставай пуховик, сапоги и шапку. Межсез

186🍓12😘8😁7💯6🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @devochki_na. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,349 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Раздетый стилист Лена Червова
@elennne_style · 101,814
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Ко-Ко-Ко (фэшн / стиль / мода)
@kokokokakmodno · 41,276
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 August 2026
Бабское коммьюнити
@community43 · 68,553
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Жанна Бадоева я
@zhannabadoeva · 57,332
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
the girl who
@girl_who · 80,056
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
Александр Бессонов
@AleksBessonov · 59,622
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Завтрак с Килиной
@zavtrak_s_Kilinoy · 62,851
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Доктор Афинская
@liza_afinskaia · 71,328
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Душнотека Грека
@zolotoygrek_life · 41,094
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя шла и нашла” (@devochki_na), 49,926 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devochki_na.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.