Channel
@directora_leka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
403subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537933598 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @directora_leka |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/directora_leka |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 403 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 404 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 403 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 406 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 406 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
209 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 36.8% | |
| 🔥 | 65 | 31.1% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.26% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.35% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 3.35% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.39% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.39% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так, про личное поговорили, на втором месте в опросе - интересные факты о языках. Вот я вам принесла забавное. Что общего у авокадо и орхидеи? Они названы в честь мужских тестикул 😆 Правда! Испанское aguacate происходит из языка науатль (язык ацтеков), где было слово: āhuacatl У него было два значения одновременно: плод авокадо и мужское яичко. Почему? Просто из-за формы и того, как плоды часто растут на дереве — …
🔥6😁3❤2
Как меня обидел один маркетолог Какое-то время назад один мой френд пожаловался на сложный месяц и спросил "а как у вас". Ну я ответила, что у меня уроков сейчас мало, заявок тоже мало, но зато много времени на отдых и спорт. Проходит еще какое-то время, и вижу я пост одного маркетолога, который начинается со слов: "Клиентов стало меньше, заявок меньше, работы мало, есть много времени на то, чтобы гулять и отдыха…
❤10💯5🔥5
Помнится, больше всего голосов было за личные истории. Одну я вам таки приготовила 😁 👇👇👇
А представьте, что кто-то учит русский и ему попадется вот это 😅🙈
😁10🤣5😱4
Мы с Вадюхой продуманы. Точнее я продуман, а ему некуда деваться 😅 Я, как и любой родитель, озадачена будущим чада своего. Сейчас он идет в 9 класс, а что потом - непонятно. Рассматриваю разные варианты. Один из которых - отправить дитятко учиться заграницу после 11го класса. На прошлой неделе мне как раз попался пост про один институт в Черногории, основанный нашими соотечественниками. Какие-то предметы там препод…
❤11🔥5
Сложно мне писать в несколько каналов сразу. Давайте лучше новости обсудим. Во Франции запретят соцсети для детей младше 15. Кажется, в Австралии был первый прецедент подобного. Что думаете? Я скорее склоняюсь к пользе запрета. Всё-таки эти соцсети - та ещё зараза 😒
❤5🔥3
Ну как вам?? Сможете повторить??😅
😁5❤4
📍А вы знали, что... ? В эфире вторая по популярности после "о личном" рубрика "Интересные факты о языках". Когда мы говорим о самых сложных языках мира, мы обычно думаем о китайском или арабском, но мало кто знает, что в топ сложнейших языков входят языки... Дагестана! Спонсор этого поста - моя июньская поездка в Дагестан 😁 В одном относительно небольшом Дагестане насчитывается более 30 разных языков! Многие из н…
🔥2😱1
Что вам было бы интересно?
The shares total 382%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Одна из рабочих и активно саботируемых мною задач на июль - составить контент-план для разных каналов с учетом продвижения моего курса по испанскому произношению. Я, как назло, какое-то время назад разрешила себе не писать из состояния "надо", а только из состояния "хочу". Хочу я, должна сказать, чаще, чем пишу, потому что путь от желания до реализации занимает время, которого либо нет, либо лень. И вот я не писала …
❤3🔥3👍2
Как ваше лето? Все уже поели традиционной окрошки? Я вот ещё нет))
❤8😁6
🌞 English Summer Club для подростков (12–16 лет) Какие есть варианты для подростка позаниматься английским летом? Кажется, что много, но на самом деле не очень. Например, можно продолжить заниматься так, как занимался весь учебный год. Или можно отправить чадо в настоящий оффлайн лагерь на пару недель - и ему развлечение, и родителям выдохнуть. Но есть нюанс в виде стоимости и/или нежелания ребенка (мой сын, наприм…
❤5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @directora_leka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вам было бы интересно?
The shares total 382%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Директриса Лёка: про языки, мозги и философию” (@directora_leka), 403 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directora_leka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.