🚫Удалённые подарки - ВСЁ! Телеграм убрал возможность дарить "удаленные подарки"🎁 (мишки на праздники, елки и тд) Ранее это можно было делать через API, сторонние приложения и тп
custom 537100697474803556038❤10🎉9👍9🔥6😱4🤯2🌚1

Channel
@dishaAfk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
37,813subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002399335686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dishaAfk |
| Description | по рекламе - @techiqqe наш чатик https://t.me/+d0UlnEDjtJ8wNGIy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dishaAfk |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 37,813 | -131 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 37,944 | -69 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 38,013 | -91 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 38,104 | -99 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 38,203 | -162 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 38,365 | -273 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 38,638 | -148 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 38,786 | -94 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 38,880 | -163 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 39,043 | -141 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 39,184 | -133 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 39,317 | -114 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 39,431 | +480 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 38,951 | -88 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 39,039 | -73 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 39,112 | -70 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 39,182 | -91 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 39,273 | -163 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 39,436 | -163 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 39,599 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (3 July 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,820 |
| Reactions total | 403 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3,816 reactions across 36 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5371006974748035560 | 1,225 | 32.1% | |
| ❤ | 878 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 382 | 10.0% | |
| 💘 | 285 | 7.47% | |
| 🔥 | 247 | 6.47% | |
| 🎉 | 208 | 5.45% | |
| 😱 | 180 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5321410307321529188 | 114 | 2.99% | |
| ❤🔥 | 111 | 2.91% | |
| 🤯 | 47 | 1.23% | |
| 💋 | 45 | 1.18% | |
| 😍 | 27 | 0.708% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 0.55% | |
| 👾 | 13 | 0.341% | |
| 🌚 | 12 | 0.314% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.21% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.157% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.105% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.079% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dishaAfk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚫Удалённые подарки - ВСЁ! Телеграм убрал возможность дарить "удаленные подарки"🎁 (мишки на праздники, елки и тд) Ранее это можно было делать через API, сторонние приложения и тп
custom 537100697474803556038❤10🎉9👍9🔥6😱4🤯2🌚1
ТЕЛЕГРАМ ПАДАЕТ ИЗ-ЗА ОДНОГО ЭМОДЖИ‼️ Какой-то дурик сделал себе эмодзи, которое крашит Telegram, и выставил его в статус — теперь ходит по чатам и крашит бедолаг! 👀Те, кто тыкнул на его профиль, теперь просто не могут зайти в Telegram...
custom 537100697474803556039👍23❤🔥10💘8🤯2👀1😱1
СЛИЛИ МИШКУ НА ХЕЛЛОУИН?! Имба? 🎃
custom 537100697474803556048👍13❤8🔥7🤯6🎉5🥰2
ОБНОВА ПОДАРКОВ 😻 В новой обнове подарки можно будет растягивать в коллекциях 🐳
custom 537100697474803556031👍16❤11😍4🔥3🎉2🌚1💘1
🎁Улучшения на лампы SOON ✈️Креативный директор заявил, что модели ламп готовы на 99% и намекнул на скорое улучшение!
custom 537100697474803556038custom 532141030732152918815🔥10❤🔥9👍6❤1💘1🤯1
МИШКА НА 1 СЕНТЯБРЯ? 🤯 ждём?🥺
custom 537100697474803556074custom 532141030732152918837❤20👍6🎉4🌚3🔥3❤🔥1
ТОП ПОДАРКОВ 😻 ➡️Самый популярный подарок🎁 ➡️Самый непопулярный подарок🎁 Всего через Telegram было куплено 9.6 млрд. звёзд за всё время,а это около $144 000 000 долларов !
custom 532141030732152918856custom 537100697474803556026❤14🎉7🔥7👍5👀2❤🔥1
3 NFT БЕЗ УСЛОВИЙ 😻 репост другу = +100% к удаче💕 Итоги 🐾
❤80custom 537100697474803556045😱25custom 53214103073215291886🌚5🎉4💘4🤯3
🚫 ПОДАРКИ ЗАПРЕТЯТ? В своём канале Екатерина Мизулина внезапно спросила — считаем ли мы звезды и подарки материальной ценностью… 😭
custom 537100697474803556058❤23👍14🎉7🔥7🤯3❤🔥1💘1
МИШКА-ТЕРРОРИСТ — ВСЁ! 🚫 Убрали мишку-террориста 🎁 и вернули обычного 🎁 Успели купить? 👀
custom 537100697474803556076❤24👍11🔥7🎉6😱4❤🔥1👀1
💎ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ TELEGRAM Ждем сегодня новые подарки или улучшения ? 🎂
custom 537100697474803556089❤21👍17🎉11🔥9💘5🤯5💯3
ПЕРВЫЕ 10 КОММЕНТОВ - 🎂 ➡️выдача , заходите в чат и лутайте мишек 👣
custom 537100697474803556077🔥22🎉17💘13❤9👍8👾2😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @dishaAfk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@dishaAfk edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дишка” (@dishaAfk), 37,813 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dishaAfk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.