Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Блог Хирурга о Здоровье

Channel

Блог Хирурга о Здоровье

@doctor_tips21

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,011subscribers

-294 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630424135
TypeChannel
Username@doctor_tips21
DescriptionО медицине неформально, интересно и открыто. Все самое свежее из мира медицины.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/doctor_tips21

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@doctor_tips21/5519 · this entry29 Jun 2026, 17:49 UTC@scientificdiagnos/97229 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC1.0017 minutes
@doctor_tips21/5525 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC@scientificdiagnos/9781 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC1.0010 minutes
@doctor_tips21/5528 · this entry6 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC@scientificdiagnos/9866 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC1.0016 minutes
@doctor_tips21/5529 · this entry11 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC@scientificdiagnos/99011 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@doctor_tips21/5532 · this entry14 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC@scientificdiagnos/99814 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC1.004 minutes
@doctor_tips21/5536 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC@scientificdiagnos/100727 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC0.9717 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@scientificdiagnos7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9816 minutesthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @doctor_tips21 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,0117,3057,1587 August 2026 — 7,305 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,305 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,301 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,269 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,246 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,227 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,176 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,150 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,118 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,104 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,086 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,073 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,058 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,045 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,032 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,021 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,011 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
17 measurements spanning 89 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,967–7,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 14:417,011-10
1 Nov 2026, 12:407,021-11
29 Oct 2026, 15:077,032-13
26 Oct 2026, 22:377,045-13
24 Oct 2026, 03:507,058-15
21 Oct 2026, 11:067,073-13
18 Oct 2026, 05:277,086-18
15 Oct 2026, 05:467,104-14
12 Oct 2026, 08:597,118-32
5 Oct 2026, 20:597,150-26
28 Sept 2026, 04:417,176-51
18 Sept 2026, 08:207,227-19
15 Aug 2026, 03:137,246-23
11 Aug 2026, 13:387,269-32
8 Aug 2026, 07:047,301-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:477,305no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:397,305first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 7,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
782
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.752%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held54 (27 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total25,812
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 01:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,780
Videos
≈623
Links
≈608

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

418 reactions across 54 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11226.8%
👍7618.2%
🔥7217.2%
👏409.57%
🎉399.33%
✍296.94%
😱276.46%
⚡112.63%
❤‍🔥30.718%
😢30.718%
😍20.478%
🙏20.478%
💯10.239%
🤯10.239%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC664 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

На гастроскопии камера идёт по пищеводу, не в лёгкие На фото начало настоящего исследования. Гибкая трубка позволяет посмотреть пищевод, желудок и верхнюю часть тонкой кишки. Путь для неё — пищеварительный, а не дыхательный. Это важное различие для тех, кого пугает сама мысль о трубке во рту. При прохождении через горло возможен рвотный позыв. Для комфорта предлагают местный обезболивающий спрей или седацию — вариа…

👍2🔥2🎉1👏1

5 Nov 2026, 17:38 UTC630 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥2🎉1👍1👏1

5 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC673 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Костный вырост на снимке — не обязательно рак Здесь остеохондрома возле колена: на рентгеновских проекциях виден выступ, связанный с костью, а слева показана МРТ. Это доброкачественное костно-хрящевое образование, которое чаще обнаруживают у детей и подростков рядом с зоной роста. Оно не является отколовшимся после травмы осколком. Вырост может увеличиваться вместе с ребёнком и обычно перестаёт расти после завершен…

🎉3🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC669 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В кожной кисте может быть не жир и не гной На фото эпидермальная киста пальца. У неё есть оболочка и содержимое. Часто это густая масса из кератина — материала наружного слоя кожи и волос. Поэтому бытовое название «жировик» не объясняет, что именно находится внутри шишки. Клетки, оказавшиеся глубже поверхности кожи, продолжают размножаться и формируют замкнутый мешочек. Это не признак плохой гигиены. Некоторые кист…

❤3🎉1👍1

5 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC787 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤2🎉2👏1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC805 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Электроды ЭКГ не бьют током На фото грудные электроды с присосками. В других комплектах используют наклеивающиеся контакты. Их задача — уловить электрические сигналы, которые уже создаёт сердце, а аппарат превращает запись в график. Лечебный разряд при обычной ЭКГ не подаётся. Поэтому исследование отличается и от дефибрилляции, и от УЗИ сердца. ЭКГ прежде всего записывает электрическую активность, включая частоту и…

❤2🎉2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC752 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ревматоидный артрит — не просто «суставы стёрлись» На фото выраженные изменения кисти при длительном заболевании. Но болезнь начинается не с готовой деформации: иммунная система атакует собственные ткани, прежде всего внутреннюю оболочку сустава — синовиальную. Возникают воспаление, припухлость, боль и скованность. Со временем воспаление может повреждать хрящ, кость и поддерживающие структуры. Часто суставы поражаю…

🎉3👏2❤1👍1

4 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC805 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сеточка на пересаженной коже сделана намеренно На фото участок после пересадки кожи. Множество небольших отверстий — не обязательно признак того, что ткань «разошлась». Хирург может специально превратить тонкий трансплантат в сетку: так его удаётся растянуть на большую площадь и дать жидкости выходить из-под него. Кожу берут с другого участка тела. При расщеплённом трансплантате забирают верхние слои, а донорский у…

🎉2👍2🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC783 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Почему среди круглых клеток крови появились «серпы»? На микрофотографии мазка видны вытянутые изогнутые эритроциты. При серповидноклеточной болезни меняется гемоглобин — белок, который переносит кислород. Это группа наследственных заболеваний, а не результат того, что кровь случайно неправильно взяли из пальца. Обычные эритроциты способны проходить по мелким сосудам. Изменённые клетки становятся жёсткими и липкими,…

❤2👍2🔥2🎉1

4 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC858 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Белое пятно и настоящая дырка в зубе — разные этапы Кариес начинается не обязательно с боли и чёрной полости. Бактерии используют сахара и крахмалы из пищи, образуют кислоты, а эмаль теряет минералы. Раннее изменение может выглядеть как белое пятно и ещё не давать никаких ощущений. Пока полость не сформировалась, этот процесс иногда удаётся остановить или обратить с помощью минералов слюны и фторидов. Но если эмаль…

👏5❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @doctor_tips21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @doctor_tips21 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
7

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Голова Медузы🪼
@golovameduza · 23,493
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Анатомия и физиология человека
@anatomy_cheloveka · 20,692
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026
Патология 💉🩸
@PATologiamedic · 29,120
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
Я СТУДЕНТ МЕДИК
@student_medik · 23,424
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
new Кардиология
@cardiology_info · 19,225
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
Неврология и Психиатрия
@neurology_and_psychiatry · 19,571
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
Медицинские лекции книги курсы
@medicinskie_lekcii · 34,041
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Блог Хирурга о Здоровье” (@doctor_tips21), 7,011 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctor_tips21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.