• Shifokor | Ozish va erishilgan natijani saqlashda barqaror ovqatlanish odatlari va xulq-atvor bo‘yicha shugʻullanaman.
• “Ongli Ozish” —> @formula_ilovasi
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net -6,320. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,972–42,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:21
34,920
-75
6 Nov 2026, 06:20
34,995
-109
5 Nov 2026, 02:47
35,104
-83
4 Nov 2026, 03:29
35,187
-87
3 Nov 2026, 00:45
35,274
-99
1 Nov 2026, 22:46
35,373
-101
31 Oct 2026, 21:36
35,474
-58
30 Oct 2026, 20:08
35,532
-29
29 Oct 2026, 23:27
35,561
-63
29 Oct 2026, 01:29
35,624
-103
27 Oct 2026, 23:27
35,727
-54
27 Oct 2026, 01:57
35,781
-62
26 Oct 2026, 03:05
35,843
-57
25 Oct 2026, 01:37
35,900
-64
23 Oct 2026, 23:36
35,964
-55
23 Oct 2026, 02:46
36,019
-91
22 Oct 2026, 03:31
36,110
-119
20 Oct 2026, 18:17
36,229
-66
19 Oct 2026, 16:15
36,295
-59
18 Oct 2026, 19:17
36,354
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 175 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 34,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,500
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
71 (6 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
124,980
Reactions total
2,525
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 05:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
831
Videos
76
Links
308
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,870 reactions across 71 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,227
38.9%
🔥
6,397
22.2%
❤
6,257
21.7%
😁
2,975
10.3%
custom 5192825506239616944
1,752
6.07%
custom 5370881342659631698
262
0.908%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 71 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doctorferuz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Yaqinda "Fikr yetakchilari" jamoasi meni tog‘ safariga speaker sifatida taklif qilishdi.
Tadbirkor energiyasi, ovqatlanishi, vaznni ongli boshqaruv mavzulari qiziqligini bildirishdi.
Borishdan avval mavzuga mos prezentatsiya tayyorladim. Lekin keyin o‘ylab qoldim, men boradigan auditoriya katta ehtimol ko‘p narsani biladiganlar, balki boshida aniqlab olarman...
Seminar boshida 2-3 ta aniqlashtiruvchi savol beraman…
Hayotingizda hech qachon men hozir keltiradigan bu qadar go‘zal Paradoksni ko‘rmagansiz.
Shu qadar go‘zal-ki, shu kuningizgacha ham va bundan keyin ham ko‘rmaysiz.
Juda go‘zalligidan kuysam ham, yonsam ham tasvirlashga harakat qilaman:
Birinchi notasi:
Original videolarimni ko‘rishmaydi, lekin sun’iy intellektda (SI) yasalganini ko‘rishadi...
Ikkinchi notasi:
Originallari o‘rtacha 10 daqiqa, lekin SI’da yasalganl…
Odamlar uchun kurashaverib charchadim, rosti.
Bir necha yildan beri aytmagan so‘zim, qilmagan ishim qolmadi.
Fosh qilish, soxta ekanini tushuntirishga bir necha yildan beri rosa urindim va imkoniyatim darajasida qo‘limdan kelganini qildim.
Oxirgi vaqtlarda shu haqida ko‘p o‘yladim va o‘zim uchun qaror qildim - endi qaytib bu haqida o‘ylamayman.
Oxirgi marta bir misol bilan tushuntirish beraman. Keyin bu mavzuga q…
30 daqiqada Ozish siri
Yaqinda ofisdan uyga taksi chaqirdim. Haydovchi meni tanidi va "Sizni kuzatib turaman, yaxshi bo‘ldi o‘zingizni ko‘rib qolganim. Ozish uchun nima qilay, 30 daqiqalik yöl ekan..." deb qoldi.
Bu vaqtda hamma narsani so‘rab, o‘rganib olsa bo‘ladi, muhimi, nima yeyish yoki yemaslikni bilib olishga ko‘p vaqt kerak emas-ku... (deb balki ichida o‘ylagandir).
Bilmadim, balki menga shunday tuyulgandi…
Audioda:
— soxta videoni qanday tanib olish mumkin;
— nega ozdiruvchi choy va BADlar ishlamaydi;
— haydovchilik guvohnomasining ozishga nima aloqasi bor;
— yil oxirigacha qolgan ikki oyda nima qilish kerak.
2 million soʻmingiz choʻntagingizda qolsin desangiz, oxirigacha eshiting.
Formula ilovasi: https://onelink.to/4bj86b
@formula_ilovasi
Ozishdagi odatlar nima degani?
Oddiy qoida: ozmoqçisiz va buning uchun nimadir qilişingiz kerakligini bildingiz.
Öşa qilmoqçi bölganingizni agar kamida 1 yildan keyin ham davom ettira olsangiz, demak u katta ehtimol Odat.
Agar davom ettira olmasangiz, demak u Diyeta.
Misol uçun, kimdir oziş uçun nonni çeklaş kerakligini aytdi. Şu paytda öylab köring, 1 yildan keyin ham şunday yaşay olasizmi yoki davom ettira olas…
Vazn bu raqam
Tarozi raqam körsatadi,
Santimetr lentasi raqam körsatadi,
Pedometr raqam körsatadi,
Analiz javoblari raqam körsatadi,
Uxlash-tiklanish foizlari, kaloriyalar - hammasi raqamlar...
Raqamlar kerak, ular yaxshi, ayniqsa möljal olish uchun juda qulay.
Lekin salomatlik borasida raqamshunosga aylanish yaxshi emas va buni sababi bor.
Hayotiy misol:
Bir kishidan nega kayfiyatingiz yöq, deb sörasam, aytadi …
Ovqat haqida gapirganda koʻp soʻzni ruscha aytib yuboramiz: «гречка», «перекус», «изжога».
Shu so‘zlarni ishlatishga odatlanib qolganmiz. Holbuki ularning oʻzbekchasi bor: marjumak, tamaddi, jigʻildon qaynashi.
Rasmga shunday 19 ta soʻzni yigʻdim. Nechtasining oʻzbekchasini bilardingiz?
Milliy tilni yoʻqotmak millatning ruhini yoʻqotmakdur.
Abdulla Avloniy
Bugun hech boʻlmasa bitta soʻzni oʻzbekcha aytib koʻring.…
Formula ilovasini yuklab oldingiz-u, qandaydir muammoga duch keldingizmi?
Yoki hali «Bu menga toʻgʻri keladimi?» deb oʻylab yuribsizmi?
Ikkala savolga ham javob endi bitta joyda. Formulaning oʻz kanalini ochdik — @formula_ilovasi
U yerda:
— Formula nima uchun yaratilgani va ichida nima borligini birma-bir ochib boramiz;
— ilovadan qanday foydalanishni koʻrsatamiz va «dars ochilmayapti», «qadamlar hisoblanmayapti»,…
Bugun ko‘pchilikka dam olish kuni
Yakshanba kuni bemalol, uyda, pista va bijillaq suvlar bilan taqdimotni hotirjam ko‘raman deb o‘ylagandirsiz.
Hozir kanalga kirib, havolasini qayerdan topaman, deb turgandirsiz.
Taqdimot videosi Youtube’da. Videoni ko‘rish uchun pastdagi havolani bosing:
👉https://youtu.be/WRh6W_HPEs4
@doctorferuz
Bir kechada 931 kishi ilovani yuklab oldi. 135 kishi to‘lov qilib, ilovadan foydalanishni boshladi...🔥
Ilova hozircha UZB raqami bilan ishlagani uchun, ko‘pchilik chet eldan kirolmaganini bildirib yozishyapti. Buni ham ustida ishlayapmiz, tez orada chet eldan ham kirish imkoniyati bo‘ladi.
So‘raganlar uchun: PayMe yoki Click bo‘lmasa karta kiritish orqali to‘lov qilsa ham bo‘ladi.
Ilovada qandaydir muammoga duch k…
Taqdimotda qatnashdingizmi?
Yangi loyihamiz ma’qulmi?
Narxichi? — bu kunni biz ham sizlardek kutganmiz...
Ko‘pchiligingiz so‘ragan edingiz, biz qildik, buni uddaladik.
O‘ylayman-ki, endi har kim foydalana oladi.
Taqdimot videosini yaqinlaringizga ulashing va yoqtirma (like) ham bosing — shunda ko‘proq odamlarga ushbu yangilik yetib boradi.
Bizga ishonganingiz, izohlar qoldirganingiz, ulashganingiz, yoqtirmalar b…
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @doctorferuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@doctorferuz edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Taomlanish ilmi @taomlanish_ilmi · 20,473 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
OZISH UCHUN RAQSLAR @ozish_uchun_mashq_raqs · 54,169 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 23 August 2026
STOP SEMIZLIK @Stop_Semizlik_official · 28,436 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doctor Feruz” (@doctorferuz), 34,920 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doctorferuz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
