Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRO Трудовой кодекс | Наталья Егоренкова

Channel

PRO Трудовой кодекс | Наталья Егоренкова

@document_TK

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,125subscribers

-285 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001256153224
TypeChannel
Username@document_TK
DescriptionТОP HRD/филиалы Сбер, Газпромнефть, Роскосмос, юр.обр./к.э.н. 🎯 Услуги: https://myhrexpert.ru/ 🔥https://t.me/myhrexpert 🎯 Реклама: @Natalia_myhrexpert Мои каналы: -https://t.me/dom_dacha_01 -https://t.me/VC_rabota -https://t.me/tut_rabota_hr
Created12 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/document_TK

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,1258,4108,267.57 August 2026 — 8,410 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,404 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,386 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,375 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,360 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,350 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,338 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,326 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,320 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,310 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,291 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,281 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,263 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,236 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,214 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,197 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,190 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,176 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,167 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,163 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,151 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,141 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,130 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,125 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,082–8,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 23:298,125-5
1 Nov 2026, 04:498,130-11
29 Oct 2026, 06:478,141-10
26 Oct 2026, 09:558,151-12
23 Oct 2026, 14:348,163-4
20 Oct 2026, 17:008,167-9
18 Oct 2026, 00:458,176-14
15 Oct 2026, 03:088,190-7
11 Oct 2026, 18:388,197-17
5 Oct 2026, 15:368,214-22
27 Sept 2026, 13:198,236-27
18 Sept 2026, 10:598,263-18
13 Sept 2026, 18:188,281-10
9 Sept 2026, 20:398,291-19
4 Sept 2026, 22:198,310-10
1 Sept 2026, 11:498,320-6
29 Aug 2026, 22:248,326-12
26 Aug 2026, 15:048,338-12
23 Aug 2026, 04:488,350-10
20 Aug 2026, 00:528,360first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.30%
avg views ÷ 8,125 subscribers
Avg views / post
349
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held25 (11 March 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total349
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
96
Videos
12
Links
580

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 25 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6549.6%
❤4030.5%
🔥129.16%
👎86.11%
👌21.53%
😁21.53%
🤝21.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

16 Oct 2026, 04:25 UTC349 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚖️ СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА Обязан ли работодатель выплачивать выходное пособие при увольнении по собственному желанию? Статья 178 ТК РФ предусматривает обязательные случаи выплаты выходного пособия, однако стороны могут договориться о пособии и при увольнении по собственному желанию или по соглашению сторон. Например, указать это в условиях трудового договора. Если работодатель отказывается платить выходное пособие, уст…

👍5❤1

28 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC737 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Определение Четвертого кассационного суда общей юрисдикции от 02.03.2023 по делу N 88-2412/2023 "Несогласование кандидатуры нового начальника юридического отдела с О., не привлечение работников учреждения, о нарушениях которыми трудовой дисциплины в своих служебных записках сообщал работодателю истец, не указывает на дискриминацию истца применительно к требованиям статьи 3 Трудового кодекса Российской Федерации, так …

👍1

24 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC786 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Допускается запрос в устной беседе при свидетелях с последующим составлением акта об отказе дачи объяснений Определение 7 КСОЮ от 11.10.2022 № 88-15432/2022 УИД 89RS0001-01-2022-000483-57

👍3

19 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC949 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

ЕЖЕДНЕВНЫЕ ОТЧЕТЫ Определение Шестого кассационного суда общей юрисдикции от 08.08.2024 по делу N 88-19317/2024 (УИД 03RS0001-01-2022-003920-44) "Отказывая в удовлетворении исковых требований в части дискриминации со стороны ответчика, суд первой инстанции исходил из того, что распоряжения, обязывающее истца представлять ежедневные отчеты о проделанной работе и планах на следующий день не свидетельствуют о дискрими…

🤝2❤1

7 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,020 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Определение Первого кассационного суда общей юрисдикции от 27.11.2023 по делу N 88-36279/2023 "Судами первой и апелляционной инстанций установлено, что П.Д.В. не является отцом, воспитывающим ребенка без матери, мать ребенка не ограничена и не лишена родительских прав, она осуществляет за ним уход, в связи с чем суды пришли к обоснованному выводу, что не предоставление истцу времени для кормления ребенка в данном слу…

❤2

21 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,220 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Определение Первого кассационного суда общей юрисдикции от 11.04.2023 по делу N 88-9100/2023, 2-3263/2022 Доводы кассационной жалобы истца о наличии дискриминации в действиях работодателя являются несостоятельными, поскольку признаки дискриминации, перечисленные в статье 3 Трудового кодекса Российской Федерации, в действиях ответчика в ходе рассмотрения дела не установлены, установление различий в размерах заработно…

❤3

10 Jul 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,070 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚖️ СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА Травма, которая была получена по пути на работу или в командировке Согласно части 3 статьи 227 ТК РФ несчастным случаем на производстве признается инцидент, в ходе которого сотрудник получает травму по пути на работу или во время обратного пути, а также во время командировки. Если травма была получена на территории работодателя, но в нерабочее время, то признание ее производственной будет спор…

❤5👍2😁2

6 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC983 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚖️ СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА Выговор без согласования профсоюза законен, если работник скрыл, что в нём состоит Закон не обязывает работодателя учитывать мнение профсоюза, если к работнику применяют замечание или выговор. Но если работник — сам член профсоюза, то запросить мнение всё же придётся. Тут нюанс: сотрудник может не сообщить, что он состоит в профсоюзе. Что тогда, разобрался 3-й КСОЮ. 25 марта 2024 года в одной …

👌2❤1👍1

1 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC834 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚖ СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА Работницу уволили за необоснованные требования, а она отсудила за это почти миллион Работодатель нашёл повод, чтобы избавиться от сотрудницы и в кратчайшие сроки выписал ей 2 дисциплинарных взыскания с последующим увольнением. Женщина через суд добилась восстановления и взыскала с компании 920 тысяч рублей компенсации. Работница трудилась на удалёнке и в ноябре 2023 года ей прилетело уведомлени…

👍8🔥6❤2

30 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC667 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Госорган переехал, должностные обязанности не меняли – суд не нашел оснований для сокращения Место работы ряда госслужащих перевели в другой населенный пункт. Поскольку они не согласились с новшествами, их уволили из-за изменений существенных условий контракта. Служащие обратились в суд, полагая, что их должности сократили. 6-й КСОЮ с их мнением не согласился. Для оптимизации спорные должности перевели в населенны…

❤1👍1

29 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC758 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Взносы на травматизм: суды поддержали переквалификацию договоров ГПХ в трудовые СФР посчитал, что отношения между организацией и физлицами трудовые, а не гражданско-правовые, и включил выплаты в базу по страховым взносам на травматизм. Две инстанции согласились с проверяющими. Они учли, в частности, такие факты: ✔️договоры подряда однотипные; ✔️предмет договора – оказание услуг по учету грузов специалистом со спецп…

❤2

17 Jun 2026, 15:51 UTC970 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚖СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА Установить дифференцированные оклады работникам можно 2 КСОЮ согласился с выводами суда о том, что со стороны работодателя каким-либо образом были нарушены права работника - установление дифференцированных должностных окладов работникам не является дискриминацией в сфере трудовых отношений применительно к положениям ст. 3 ТК РФ, так как направлено на соблюдение прав работников на своевременную и…

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @document_TK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Роструд
@rostrud_official · 26,144
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Кадровику
@kadroviku · 44,914
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
Полезное для Кадровика
@trud_krut · 23,342
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Рабочие лайфхаки: секреты и советы
@lifehackoftheday · 25,861
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRO Трудовой кодекс | Наталья Егоренкова” (@document_TK), 8,125 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/document_TK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.