Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DOU | QA

Channel

DOU | QA

@dou_qa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,553subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658444532
TypeChannel
Username@dou_qa
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dou_qa

Growth

12,55312,63512,5946 August 2026 — 12,635 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,632 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,626 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,622 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,618 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,622 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,619 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,614 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,618 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,615 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,614 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,609 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,601 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,603 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,604 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,598 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,595 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,584 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,575 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,573 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,569 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,570 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,553 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 33 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,541–12,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 10:1612,553-17
5 Sept 2026, 08:1712,570+1
3 Sept 2026, 09:0312,569-4
1 Sept 2026, 23:0512,573-2
31 Aug 2026, 20:2812,575-8
30 Aug 2026, 23:4312,583-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:0412,584-8
29 Aug 2026, 00:2512,592-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:2212,595-3
27 Aug 2026, 01:5912,598-6
26 Aug 2026, 00:1212,604+1
25 Aug 2026, 03:0212,603+2
23 Aug 2026, 16:1412,601-8
20 Aug 2026, 17:0312,609-5
19 Aug 2026, 17:2212,614-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:2312,615-3
17 Aug 2026, 15:5512,618+4
16 Aug 2026, 07:1212,614-5
12 Aug 2026, 11:4712,619-3
11 Aug 2026, 12:4512,622first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 12,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,650
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.913%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held54 (20 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total105,750
Reactions total966
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,892 reactions across 54 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡36219.1%
32817.3%
😁29115.4%
👍22411.8%
🤣20610.9%
🤮1105.81%
😭985.18%
😢753.96%
🫡482.54%
🔥382.01%
🤯261.37%
👀160.846%
🤪120.634%
🐳100.529%
🙏100.529%
🥴100.529%
🕊80.423%
🥰60.317%
👎50.264%
💊20.106%
4 further kinds70.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,892 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,170 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«Зарплата приблизно така ж, як в ІТ». 5 історій QA-фахівців, які перейшли в оборонку https://dou.ua/goto/ogFw Ми поговорили з п’ятьма QA-фахівцями про їхню роботу, професійний шлях і відмінності між тестуванням оборонних та цивільних продуктів. А ще — про зарплати, вакансії та навички, які потрібні тестувальникам у defence tech.

👍21😁11🤡7💊2

1 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,810 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Manual QA (Junior) в Gameloft Львів, віддалено 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/927d Middle Manual QA в Readeat, $1200–1500 віддалено 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/5N4E QA Engineer в Frontline Robotics Київ 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/hI1t Middle Manual QA в Hurma System віддалено 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/uveN Senior QA Automation Engineer, ASIC Simulation в NVIDIA Київ, віддалено 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/Btni

🤮2👍1

1 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,460 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Щороку ми досліджуємо, що для айтівців справді важливо при виборі роботодавця. Цього року вже понад 3000 людей долучилися до опитування. Якщо ваша думка ще не врахована — запрошуємо пройти анкету 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/CmbB

🤮2🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,620 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Чому від джуна-QA сьогодні вимагають SQL, Postman та знання XSS? Це інфляція вимог чи сувора необхідність? Ігор Потапенко розбирає, як за 12 років змінився ринок, навіщо на співбесідах питають про HTTP-коди та які 6 навичок насправді потрібні для старту в мануальному тестуванні. 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/fYRh

🤪12👍7🤮6😁5🤡2

30 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,810 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Якщо пишете автотести на Java, JUnit Pioneer можна прибрати частину рутини навколо них. У своїй статті Сергій Моренець показує, як простіше працювати з environment variables і системними властивостями, передавати тестові дані з JSON, робити Cartesian-тести, retry тощо. 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/Ib6Y

4🤡4👍1

29 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,360 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @qa_advicePhoto

В День памʼяті захисників України я згадую Гену Міщевського, друга, найдійного партнера, батька і захисника. Друже ми памʼятаємо тебе і твій вклад в розвиток спільноти тестувальників і захисту нашої країни. Не всі тут знають, але ми з Геною робили подкаст про тестування де перший випуск вийшов майже 3 роки тому... https://www.youtube.com/@qa-balachky Також у нього є мега популярна стаття на DOU про фундаментальну

🫡37🙏10🕊8

29 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈3,180 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

AI може за хвилини написати тисячі рядків автотестів, а потім виявляється, що вони перевіряють не те 🙂 QA Engineer Євген Шаповал показує на власному кейсі, як AI згенерував 2700 рядків тестів, а подальша перевірка знайшла false positives та сумнівні concurrency-тести. 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/cKel

🤡12😁102

28 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,040 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

AI розірвав зв’язок між Story Points та часом виконання. Анна Куркотова ділиться баченням, чому старі підходи до оцінки в QA вже не такі дієві в командах з AI. У статті: зсув фокусу від створення до верифікації та нова модель естимації з трьох осей: Complexity, Effective Human Load та Flow Time. 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/695v

😁11🤮102👍2

27 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,000 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Щочетверга — новий квіз для QA та ще один привід перевірити, що лишилося в голові після років роботи (ну або чому ви навчились). У другому випуску Head of QA Аня Куркотова принесла п’ять питань на тему баз даних. А наприкінці є бонус 🙃 Погнали: https://dou.ua/goto/6OeQ

👍18🤮83

27 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,430 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @qa_advicePhoto

2 тижні тому ми зібрались чоловічою компанією для обговорення поточного стану справ з AI, що де працює, що не працює і що робити далі. Але мене не покидало відчуття що наші погляди занадто схожі, бекграунд +- один і той самий... Тож стало цікаво, а що з AI у прекрасної половини нашої професії. Як у них все це відбувається? Що відверто бісить і що з цим робити далі... Тож я запросив до себе на стрім Інну Осінну - QA

22🤮4

26 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,380 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Якщо пишете автотести на Java, є кілька способів зробити їх коротшими та чистішими. У своїй статті Сергій Моренець розбирає JUnit Pioneer та його можливості для Automation QA. Автор показує, як спростити роботу з environment variables і системними властивостями, передавати тестові дані з JSON, створювати Cartesian-тести тощо. 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/IuIT

👍10🥴3

25 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,140 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Висока зарплата чи справді цікавий продукт? 💰🍕 Якщо доведеться обирати, що буде для вас важливішим? Поділіться своєю думкою в опитуванні 👉 https://dou.ua/goto/CmbB

🤡16

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @dou_qa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,610 voters approx.

Що означає HTTP статус-код 204?

  1. A) Сервер не знайшов ресурс5%
  2. B) Запит виконано успішно, тіло відповіді порожнє84%
  3. C) Сервер перенаправляє на іншу URL7%
  4. D) Запит потребує авторизації4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,210 voters approx.

Який механізм найкраще мав би запобігти такій ситуації?

  1. A) Rate limiting17%
  2. B) Idempotency key61%
  3. C) Caching7%
  4. D) Retry з exponential backoff16%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Junior дайджест dou.ua
@junior_dou_ua · 50,135
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
DOU
@doucommunity · 42,154
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
EPAM Campus UA
@epamuniprogua · 31,705
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DOU | QA” (@dou_qa), 12,553 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dou_qa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.