Channel
@dragonchaservoice
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
193subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002500412239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dragonchaservoice |
| Created | Between 1 January 2025 and 30 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dragonchaservoice |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 193 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 194 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 196 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 187 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 185 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 185 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 7 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There's plenty of legends about werewolves, of wolfmen, individuals with the power to connect with nature on a primal level, those rituals, religious in nature, are a connection we have with nature and a threat to the "well dressed, sharply educated man of modern society", he who refuses to dance around the fire like his ancestors do and, instead, prefers to sit down at some pub and drink beer until he loses reason. …
But what is a werewolf, really? He is the embodiment of primitive strength that mankind was conditioned to suppress and deem it evil. He's the bridge between man and beast, civilization and nature, in its rawest form. The wolf hunts, eats, protects himself and protects those around him, and so the men were supposed to, but christianity has forced men into a state of meekness, to behave and silence these violent thoug…
The essay above is, to say the least, really interesting. And if I may be so bold, I'll make additions of my own. So... Dracula is, interestingly enough, a nobleman, an European aristocrat that represents the past that refuses to die. There is, however, the other side of the coin on this conversation. Werewolves. Lycanthropes, Wolfmen. The werewolf is, in many aspects, a entity of death and savagery, that strips the …
But doesn’t Dracula’s fear of the crucifix contradict such interpretation? Isn’t christianity an element of the old, traditional world? Many less history-savvy readers do see it as such. But we know that christianity is fundamentally progressivist. This sect of judaism has been used to separate Europeans from their past for generations. Abrahamic linear time is a dead giveaway shared by all Axial Age (anti-)religions…
What less versed readers miss is the fact that back in Stoker’s days London was the most modernized, industrial, progressive city in the world. A perfect representation of the new age contrasted sharply by Dracula’s original ancient dwelling. Dracula is not only a foreigner in a spacial, but also temporary sense. His arrival brings doom to the city of the future because the count is an intimidating, hyper-masculine a…
While the count’s background is not elaborated on in the original novel, we do know a few things for sure. Dracula is a member of European aristocracy, specifically Eastern European. Even his original description (rarely preserved in movies) matches that of a typical 16th-17th c. nobleman from those parts. He lives in a decrepit castle being a living (or rather undead) relic of the past. The count is also inspired by…
Is Dracula a progressivist nightmare? Bram Stoker’s Dracula has been one of the most read and adapted books for more than a century and one can find numerous interpretations of the novel. Of course titular Dracula is the most iconic, intriguing and discussed characters of all. Is he an embodiment of a plague? A gay, jew or just a seductive foreigner? Maybe all of the above? By far the rarest and most peculiar is a t…
Surtr Rising by Jakub Jagoda
Picture of a happy family
😁1
When serpents speak ill of our symbols because they are afraid they are 'racist ', smite them completely out of your life. These people allow the opinions and perceptions of others to dictate their views. We don't need to debate about who used them and why it was wrong. The truth is, the only people that shouldn't be using our symbols are these Wokatru cowards. Uphold our heritage and traditions without apology or …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
If you were wondering I didn’t add metal to the pic above to preserve the symmetry. It’s obviously a White genre both in sound and esthetics.
⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dragonchaservoice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dragonchaser's Voice” (@dragonchaservoice), 193 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dragonchaservoice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.