Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aryan Paganism, Traditions and Art (APTA)

Channel

Aryan Paganism, Traditions and Art (APTA)

@Aryanpaganism

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,488subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685658993
TypeChannel
Username@Aryanpaganism
Created5 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aryanpaganism

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,4888,5378,512.56 August 2026 — 8,498 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,498 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,500 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,523 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,537 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,536 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,528 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,524 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,522 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,525 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,528 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,512 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,502 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,493 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,488 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,481–8,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:188,488-5
14 Sept 2026, 07:008,493-9
10 Sept 2026, 11:598,502-10
5 Sept 2026, 13:208,512-16
1 Sept 2026, 11:058,528+3
29 Aug 2026, 19:178,525+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:128,522-2
23 Aug 2026, 04:038,524-4
19 Aug 2026, 21:568,528-8
16 Aug 2026, 16:068,536-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:548,537+14
9 Aug 2026, 11:328,523+23
6 Aug 2026, 19:248,500+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:308,498no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:228,498first reading

Engagement

99 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.65%
avg views ÷ 8,488 subscribers
Avg views / post
480
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 99 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held99 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total10,554
Reactions total312
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
1m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,526 reactions across 94 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50933.4%
👍39025.6%
35223.1%
🔥27518.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,639 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC433 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

We stand at a crossroads. Choose wisely.

19👍2

28 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC230 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pagan_RevivalismPhoto

In a recent unsurprising turn of events, most likely a rage response to the Sedianism v Platonism debate, the Platonists have come back with their "gotcha." Hee he, the Gods you worship are just rapists and thieves. This is a very similar style argument you see from judeo-christians, reinforcing the historical proto-christian & christian-collaborator allegations. When Mark explained the legends of Odin, Rind & Vali

🔥51

27 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC330 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

…our Christian life is so diluted by such a vast amount of paganism, even inside the church itself, that one gets the impression these gracious forces drip in meager dewdrops… Pavel Florensky Orthodox theologian, priest, philosopher, mathematician, physicist, electrical engineer, inventor, polymath, neomartyr and saint

7

26 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC459 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Latvian Goddess Mara Ansis Cīrulis

141

26 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC439 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Latvian blue cows are also called sea cows because it is believed that the breed originated from one of the cows in the herd of the sea goddess Mara.

17

26 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC405 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

In a Pagan society such cows would be valued not just for their beauty, but because they are local and unique, just like ancestral traditions. Meanwhile, in platonic-abrahamic, universalist worldview they are just a local variation and therefore easily replaceable with any other cow out there.

👍18

26 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC715 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

The Latvian blue cow (aka sea cow or moon cow) is a unique local species from Latvia. They are smaller than regular cows and have a silvery-blue coat. Such cows are not suitable for mass-production of milk, so their numbers have decreased as less and less people keep them at their farms. Now this beautiful animal is on the verge of extinction. Art by Sindija Mactama

👍1744

26 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC469 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Florensky correctly points out the difference between Pagan morals of the original Amleth who takes revenge with the straightforward brutality of a man who knows his duties to, in the priest’s words, the cult of the clan. Meanwhile, Hamlet wavers as while already a christian, he is not enough of one to simply forgive and forget. He is indeed compelled by the spirit of the past, but is a man of the present and as a re

11🔥4

26 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC459 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

"Remember me, Hamlet. You must take revenge!" This is what one voice says again and again. It’s the spirit of the past talking to the present, it is the dead rising from their graves to get the descendant back to the cult of the clan. "Let go, do not kill, do not seek revenge. Forgive, and follow Me…" This is what the second voice says, the voice of a new consciousness… Yes, Hamlet did not accomplish his task and co

🔥113

25 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC474 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Shakespeare preserved (in a relatively unchanged state) the setting in which Amleth was meant to be and the demands placed upon him by the pagan, clan-based consciousness, but he ennobled and modernized Amleth, transforming him into Hamlet. The primary objective, revenge, remained the same, as did the relationships between the characters. However, the nascent Christian conscience that Shakespeare instills in his prot

14👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @Aryanpaganism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Aryanpaganism edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTCAnonymous Poll119 voters

Can you bench press your own weight?

  1. Yes69%
  2. No31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTCAnonymous Poll93 voters

What’s next?

  1. More monsters31%
  2. Hamlet analysis from Pagan perspective69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Want me to translate more from Florensky? It’s 4 tomes with plenty of material.

  1. Yes88%
  2. No12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,703
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aryan Paganism, Traditions and Art (APTA)” (@Aryanpaganism), 8,488 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aryanpaganism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.