Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Duffy’s Calls

Channel

Duffy’s Calls

@duffyscalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,817subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633133118
TypeChannel
Username@duffyscalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/duffyscalls

Growth

2,8172,8662,841.57 August 2026 — 2,866 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,859 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,858 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,852 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,844 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,838 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,832 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,829 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,819 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,817 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,810–2,873 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 02:172,817-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:232,819-10
28 Aug 2026, 12:082,829-3
25 Aug 2026, 19:332,832-6
23 Aug 2026, 01:472,838-6
19 Aug 2026, 21:252,844-8
16 Aug 2026, 19:432,852-6
12 Aug 2026, 22:252,858-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:102,859-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:212,866no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:022,866first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3186.1%
🔥38.33%
🌚25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC697 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ETH 5000$ this year

2🌚2

Signed 0xDuffy

1 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC653 viewsread 7 August 2026

Bought this 30k mc https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x0a16d673af2f1967c37cfb9dca411d4db8b9b18e

Signed 0xDuffy

19 Jun 2026, 23:18 UTC654 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Good memories one of my best launches, might have something coming and we will aim higher!

3

Signed 0xDuffy

12 May 2026, 20:41 UTC772 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

30k mc gambled here $ASSLOPICA https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x0d7baea09a723df55acd001163ea0d9f4d848c06

1

Signed 0xDuffy

12 May 2026, 18:06 UTC676 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Most likely huge launch, so wait for a entry

2

Signed DuffySr

12 May 2026, 12:29 UTC656 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$TAIKI Inu - The Face Of Shib Before Doge, before SHIB… there was $TAIKI. In 2008, a single photo captured the soul of the Shiba Inu. That image became the Shiba breed mascott. FAIR LAUNCH ON ETH TODAY 6-7PM UTC. $TAIKI will be 100% community-controlled. Zero bundles. Zero taxes. SOCIALS: Tg: https://t.me/TAIKI_InuEth X: https://x.com/taiki_inueth Web: https://www.taiki-inu.xyz

3

Signed DuffySr

11 May 2026, 12:23 UTC589 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gambled here 80k mc $GOBLINMODE on sol. https://t.me/goblinmodesolportal https://dexscreener.com/solana/2ujnsa3b3cagd5hyg67ivblnmqavroujeyg1tcgyxqs9

2

Signed 0xDuffy

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duffyscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Duffy’s Calls” (@duffyscalls), 2,817 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duffyscalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.