ТОВАРИЩАМ ВСЕМ ПРИВЕТ У МЕНЯ ТУТ в канале МАКС ДО 500 подписчиков чутка не хватает https://max.ru/channel_id632400158305_biz ПРИГЛАШАЮ, кстати там в закрепе для вас много подарков для сетевика Жду вас ❤️❤️❤️
❤1

Channel
@duxigreenway1
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,198subscribers
-174 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001978981529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @duxigreenway1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/duxigreenway1 |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @duxigreenway1/550 · this entry10 May 2026, 11:24 UTC | @Storis_v_dele25/299110 May 2026, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @duxigreenway1/560 · this entry24 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC | @Storis_v_dele25/299824 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Storis_v_dele25 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Storis_v_dele25 (9–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 January 2026 to 2 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @duxigreenway1 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 16,198 | -12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 16,210 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 16,218 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 16,225 | -19 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 16,244 | -17 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 16,261 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 16,276 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:45 | 16,281 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 16,286 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:48 | 16,288 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 16,291 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 16,295 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 16,302 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 16,308 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 16,310 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 16,312 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 16,319 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 16,320 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 16,323 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 16,327 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
301 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 119 | 39.5% | |
| ❤ | 104 | 34.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 13.0% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 10.3% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.332% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.332% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ТОВАРИЩАМ ВСЕМ ПРИВЕТ У МЕНЯ ТУТ в канале МАКС ДО 500 подписчиков чутка не хватает https://max.ru/channel_id632400158305_biz ПРИГЛАШАЮ, кстати там в закрепе для вас много подарков для сетевика Жду вас ❤️❤️❤️
❤1
‼️ Если вы сетевик, который устал бегать за людьми, писать десятки сообщений без ответа и каждый месяц начинать всё заново ➡️ вы попали по адресу. Здесь я показываю, как строить современный сетевой бизнес через личный бренд, вирусный контент, автоматизацию и входящий поток клиентов и партнеров. Чтобы люди сами приходили к вам, а не вы уговаривали каждого присоединиться 💯 Этот канал для вас, если: ❤️Надоело получа…
❤3
Если честно… ❤️ Я уже не представляю, как можно строить большой бизнес только на холодных сообщениях. Это слишком дорого. Не деньгами. Энергией. Временем. Эмоциями. Да, переписки останутся частью бизнеса. ⛔️ Но сегодня они должны начинаться не с вашего сообщения: «Здравствуйте, можно вам рассказать про бизнес?» ✔️ А с сообщения человека: «Здравствуйте. Я посмотрела ваши ролики. Можно узнать подробнее?» Именно т…
🤩1
Сколько еще ты будешь ждать, что продажи "когда-нибудь пойдут"? Давай честно. Сколько месяцев ты уже говоришь себе: ⏺ летом все отдыхают... ⏺ сейчас люди не покупают... ⏺ рынок переполнен... ⏺ в моей компании тяжело... ⏺ нужно еще поучиться... А в это время кто-то закрывает квалификации. Кто-то растит команды. Кто-то получает десятки новых клиентов. И знаешь, что самое интересное? ❌ У большинства проблема вообщ…
❤3🔥1
Можно продолжать ждать. Ждать, пока площадка станет популярной. Ждать, пока конкуренты все протестируют. Ждать, пока кто-нибудь расскажет готовую схему. ▶️ И снова догонять рынок. ▶️ А можно начать сейчас. 🔥 Именно для этого мы запускаем полностью обновленный «Запуск новичка». За 5 дней ты получишь: ❤️ упаковку канала в MAX; ❤️ систему привлечения клиентов и партнеров; ❤️ контент, который приводит людей в диалог…
😘1
"MAX не взлетит..." Эту фразу я слышу практически каждый день. Так же говорили когда-то про Telegram. Потом про VK. Потом про короткие видео. И знаешь, что происходит дальше? Пока одни спорят ❤️ другие занимают рынок. Мы не ждали, пока кто-то скажет: «Теперь точно можно». Мы начали тестировать. Разбирались. Ошибались. Переделывали. ❤️И сегодня через обычные эфиры и часы здоровья в MAX к нам приходят сотни люде…
❤1🤗1
ДУХИ Greenway pinned a photo
Если у вас нет продаж - проблема не в продукте❌ Жестко? Да. Но это правда. Потому что хороший продукт сегодня есть практически в каждой компании. А вот людей, которые умеют выстраивать доверие... Единицы. За последние месяцы я разобрала сотни диалогов своих партнеров. И знаете, что увидела? Люди начинают продавать... На втором сообщении. Хотя продавать еще нечего. Человек еще даже не рассказал свою историю. 💌…
❤1
ДУХИ Greenway pinned a photo
Друзья, начинаю усиливать свой канал в MAX 🔥 Потому что, давайте честно: мы уже устали от этих танцев с VPN, прокси, "не грузит", "не открывается", "опять всё зависло". ❗️Мне нужна площадка, где можно спокойно вести блог, давать пользу, общаться с вами и не думать каждый раз: зайдёт человек или его опять куда-то не пустит. Поэтому заявляю, что активно начинаю развивать канал в MAX. Не думайте, что телеграм я брос…
Скажу честно... После нашей поездки и общения с лидерами я ещё раз убедилась в одной мысли: люди с результатом отличаются не талантами, они отличаются решениями. Кто-то ищет виноватых: ✖Наставника. ✖Компания не та. ✖Маркетинг не тот. ✖Время не то. ✖Страна не та. А кто-то задаёт себе вопрос: «Что я могу изменить уже сегодня?» Римма прошла этот путь сама: От работы по найму 👉 через несколько лет в другой сетевой к…
❤5
ДУХИ Greenway pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @duxigreenway1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДУХИ Greenway” (@duxigreenway1), 16,198 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duxigreenway1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.