Channel
@e_xiu_o1990
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
147subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002468658930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e_xiu_o1990 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e_xiu_o1990 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 147 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 148 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 147 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 145 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 141 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 141 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5312166232030468072 | 40 | 37.7% | |
| custom 5309983770168811901 | 22 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5310217991915331452 | 13 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5309942967979500367 | 12 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5312140947557995982 | 10 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5307864951132546148 | 9 | 8.49% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤 — everything I do multiply it by TWO i got This & That # This AND That ¿¿ # this Boys SKZ jisung¹ lee know hyunjin¹ jisung² changbin hyunjin² ; seungmin & jeongin lee know & seungmin 🖤 🖤 ENHYPEN sunoo jungwon BOYNEXTDOOR jaehyun¹ jaehyun² ; sungho & leehan 🖤 LNGSHOT louis ohyul & woojin 🖤 ATEEZ mingi 🖤 EXO kai xiumin 🧢 AND2BLE gyuvin & ricky 🖤 🤩 AEN junseo SEVENTEEN jun 🤩…
тока вы не сглазьте счастье мина!
custom 530998377016881190111custom 53121409475579959821
смотрите ещё один минсок 🥺
custom 53099837701688119013
Posted without readable text
custom 53099837701688119014
у них один гардероб или один стилист, или одна мода для мужчин 35+, чтобы выглядеть молодо ?
custom 53121409475579959824custom 53099429679795003671
не опять, а снова 😝
custom 53099429679795003673
минсоки снова в футболе!! 🤍
custom 53121662320304680729custom 53099429679795003673custom 53121409475579959823
˚₊‧꒰ა 🌙 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚ STARLIGHT THERAPY ˚₊‧꒰ა ✨ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚ Starlight Therapy - это маленькое место, где можно остановиться на минутку, выдохнуть и поделиться частичкой своей жизни с теми, кто разделяет твои интересы. 🤍 До конца воскресенья я открываю рубрику для ваших историй, мыслей, новостей и всего, чем хочется поделиться. Расскажите, как проходит ваша жизнь сейчас, что вас радует или беспокоит, о чём вы думаете в последн…
знаете, я ОЧЕНЬ СИЛЬНО скучаю по лайвам минсока в инсте 😭 (про совместные лайвы с мемберами вообще молчу)
custom 53121662320304680725custom 53099837701688119014
▫️8 . 08.▫️shoomy bubble !! 😄 — погода просто супер?! [ 📷 ] — сегодня облака выглядят прямо аппетитно — интересно, какой у них вкус? — кто-нибудь подскажет~ — правильный ответ: облака нельзя съесть — ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ — всех подловил ㅋ ㅋㅋ — (я) победитель — а я пошёл встретиться с другом! ▫️
custom 531216623203046807210custom 53121409475579959822custom 53099429679795003671
ура минсок пришёл!!
custom 53099429679795003674
когда выходило это шоу, мой канал был в прайме.. киммин верни мой прайм 🌟
custom 53121662320304680726
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @e_xiu_o1990. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@e_xiu_o1990 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“౿｡° xiumin ˢʰᵒᵒᵐʸ`” (@e_xiu_o1990), 147 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_xiu_o1990.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.