Channel
@wendystilllike
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003767451088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wendystilllike |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wendystilllike |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 79 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 80 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 81 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 79 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 72 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 71 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352880597851214693 | 24 | 29.3% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5330525967385382075 | 19 | 23.2% | |
| custom 5363827696394599854 | 16 | 19.5% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖤 — everything I do multiply it by TWO i got This & That # This AND That ¿¿ # this Boys SKZ jisung¹ lee know hyunjin¹ jisung² changbin hyunjin² ; seungmin & jeongin lee know & seungmin 🖤 🖤 ENHYPEN sunoo jungwon BOYNEXTDOOR jaehyun¹ jaehyun² ; sungho & leehan 🖤 LNGSHOT louis ohyul & woojin 🖤 ATEEZ mingi 🖤 EXO kai xiumin 🧢 AND2BLE gyuvin & ricky 🖤 🤩 AEN junseo SEVENTEEN jun 🤩…
годы идут, а что-то не меняется ♦️
custom 53305259673853820753custom 53638276963945998543❤2custom 53528805978512146931
Posted without readable text
custom 53305259673853820756custom 53528805978512146936❤5custom 53638276963945998541
венди на фансайне 😅
❤4custom 53305259673853820752custom 53638276963945998542custom 53528805978512146931
✨ Wendy in TikTok
custom 53528805978512146935custom 53638276963945998542❤1custom 53305259673853820751
сынван на сегодняшнем мини-фансайне ✨
❤4custom 53638276963945998542custom 53305259673853820751custom 53528805978512146931
i need that surfin’ boy 🌟
custom 53528805978512146933custom 53638276963945998542❤1custom 53305259673853820751
✨ Red Velvet in TikTok
custom 53528805978512146933❤2custom 53305259673853820752custom 53638276963945998541
best friends 💛💚🩵
custom 53305259673853820752custom 53528805978512146932custom 53638276963945998542❤1
✨ Wendy in Instagram
❤3custom 53528805978512146932custom 53305259673853820751custom 53638276963945998541
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @wendystilllike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wendystilllike named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Only One ✶ Seungwan” (@wendystilllike), 79 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wendystilllike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.