Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 934–944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 01:57
937
+2
27 Aug 2026, 10:37
935
-1
20 Aug 2026, 23:36
936
-4
14 Aug 2026, 18:57
940
-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:50
943
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:51
943
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
343 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
128
37.3%
🔥
83
24.2%
🎉
20
5.83%
👎
20
5.83%
💔
16
4.66%
🤡
14
4.08%
❤
10
2.92%
🤣
7
2.04%
👏
6
1.75%
😱
5
1.46%
🙉
5
1.46%
🤔
5
1.46%
🤯
5
1.46%
🤮
3
0.875%
❤🔥
2
0.583%
🍾
2
0.583%
🐳
2
0.583%
🗿
2
0.583%
🤨
2
0.583%
🥱
2
0.583%
4 further kinds
4
1.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2022 to 11 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Записали я Александром(@chromealex) - автором ME.BECS разбор демо игры на фреймворке.
Поговорили про внутреннее устройство и какие фичи уже есть. Алекс рассказал для чего пришлось писать собственный аллокатор для Unity и как работает логика визуального проектирования порядка систем в ECS, где притаилась кодогенерация и причем тут многопоточка.
Получилось очень интересно, как минимум мне самому. Надеюсь, что и вы на…
DOTS development status and next milestones
Unity выкатила официальный пост по состоянию DOTS на ноябрь 2023 года. Они еще раз напомнили, что с версии Unity 2022 LTS DOTS можно использовать в релизе, ну пожалуйста используйте. Собрали список примеров и материалов с которых можно начать погружение, нырнуть с головой, да.
Я приведу их вам прямо тут:
- Entities API Overview
- ECS Samples
- Learn Content
- ECS Network…
Morpeh.Godot
Первая версия демо портирования Morpeh ECS на Godot. Кубики полетели, а значит доказательства получены.
Надо отдать должно авторам с моей стороны не пришлось плясать с бубном, завелось все очень просто.
Что дальше?
- Дальше нужен полноценный демо проект, чтобы проникнуться проблемами инструментария
- Сделать удобный сахар по аналогии с Unity версией
- Дождаться когда Godot 4 добавит поддержку мобил…
#вакансия
Команда SIXHANDS в поисках Unity Developer для проекта на ME.ECS
Что ждёт:
- Работа над многопользовательской игрой в жанре Арена Шутер (WebGL);
- Плотная работа с бэкенд-разработчиком проекта;
- Прототипирование будущих фич;
- Итеративная работа над имплементацией фич.
Требования:
- Опыт работы с архитектурой ME.ECS;
- Опыт разработки игр с многопользовательским режимом реального времени;
- Портфолио из…
Меня зовут Игорь Гулькин, и я Senior Unity Developer. За 5 лет накопилось много опыта, и я хотел бы поделиться с вами новым подходом, с помощью которого можно описывать игровые объекты декларативно внутри и компонентно снаружи.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/735244/
Разработчик Factorio поделился некоторыми подробностями работы внутренних систем, в частности, рассказал про ECS.
Большая часть игры не использует никакого подобия entity component system. ECS отлично подходит, когда нужно применить некоторое преобразование к набору данных независимо от каких-либо других переменных. К примеру, добавить вектор движения к текущей позиции. Но если у вас 5-10 переменных связаны со смено…
👍19🔥7👎4🤔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ecscomrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Внимание! Внимание!
Дуров завёз фичу с темами для чатов. В ECS Chat почти 1000 подписчиков. А значит мы можем сделать маленький телеграм-форум и разобрать его на топики. Будем производить апгрейд и делить на разделы или всё в рамках одной ленты чата?
Да, классная идея. Все обсуждения будут отсортированы на топики, даже появится флудилка.67%
Да ну. Одна лента лучше, всё в одном месте.33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2022 to 11 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ECS Comrade” (@ecscomrade), 937 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecscomrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
