Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zick | Editing Hub

Channel

Zick | Editing Hub

@editinghublab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,555subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002098629958
TypeChannel
Username@editinghublab
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/editinghublab

Growth

6,5436,5556,54918 August 2026 — 6,555 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,553 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,543 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,549 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,555 subscribers18 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,541–6,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 02:476,555+6
25 Aug 2026, 02:296,549+6
21 Aug 2026, 21:486,543-10
19 Aug 2026, 01:256,553-2
18 Aug 2026, 03:156,555first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10331.6%
🔥8024.5%
🗿3410.4%
🤩164.91%
🏆123.68%
🥰103.07%
👍92.76%
🤝92.76%
👏82.45%
72.15%
💯72.15%
🫡72.15%
❤‍🔥61.84%
🤯61.84%
🎄41.23%
😍41.23%
💋30.92%
🍓10.307%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,090 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🔔 | F.U.T.U RESULTS Those who have been selected will receive their results in their personal chat later today. Thank you very much for participating!

9🔥5👏4

14 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,470 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📣 | Futu Announcements The results of the forms for joining the F.U.T.U project will be given in the next few days; you can still register. I am very sorry for the delay; along with the reactivation of this project, the main YouTube channel will also be reactivated.

🤩7🏆2👍2

25 May 2026, 13:16 UTC≈3,290 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026

👽| Public Group The group already allows the use of stickers, and there are no restrictions on conversation topics – just stick to the rules. If necessary, a dedicated chat will be set up to discuss editing on Zick | Hub

🗿121🍓1

25 May 2026, 13:11 UTC≈2,960 views9 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📣 | Results Results will be announced from day 1 onwards, within 2 to 3 weeks depending on the number of applications received. Registration is free; no charges or payments are required at any stage. Please note that having a PayPal account is an advantage when it comes to receiving your payments.

🔥62🤩1

23 May 2026, 04:41 UTC≈2,860 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⁣📢 Attention editors! 📢 We are excited to announce the re-launch of the F.U.T.U. PROJECT (From You, To You), an incredible opportunity for talented editors in our community to collaborate directly with Zick and be part of something big. 🌟 What is the F.U.T.U. PROJECT? The F.U.T.U. PROJECT is a Zick initiative that seeks the collaboration of experienced editors for the creation and distribution of high-quality prese

🤝8🎄4🤩4🔥1

5 Mar 2026, 01:44 UTC≈4,740 views18 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 | Tutorial video requests are now active Submit your application and remember to add an example, either a video or a link. Send here: https://t.me/zickhub/34

💯74🏆4🗿3

2 Mar 2026, 17:34 UTC≈4,780 views15 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📹 | montagem alquimia trend tutorial ; alight motion 📱 Watch the video here: https://youtu.be/vchmPhdig6Q 👽 Zick | Editing Hub | 🛒 | 🏢 @ZickHub

👍6🔥4🥰4🗿1

22 Feb 2026, 17:02 UTC≈6,300 views23 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🆕 | Ultimate Text Pack | Free & Premium | Alight Motion 📱 The best text package I have made so far. ℹ️ Product information: 🆓 Free Version (18 presets), including: - Text Glow Settings (+4) - Flux Texture - Basic Animations (8) - Aesthetic/Glitch Text Animation (5) 🔝 PREMIUM (+70 presets), including: - Spacial Text's (14) - Text Effects (15) - Animated Compositions (10) - Popular Paragraph Text

9🗿9🔥3🤩2

22 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,470 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📹 | Free Popular Text Pack (xml + alight link) | 2026 | Alight Motion 📱 Watch the video (and links) here: https://youtu.be/D3YpYVBzISU?si=8rtHx0bl2_z0cal8 👽 Zick | Editing Hub | 🛒 | 🏢 @ZickHub

82🤩2🥰2👍1🤝1

9 Feb 2026, 17:02 UTC≈4,450 views16 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

He killed his dog. | John Wick 2 Movie: John Wick Song: Tiki Tiki Watch this video in higher quality 📹 TikTok | 📱 YouTube Short 🏢 @ZickHub | 🛒 | 💻 Fiverr

11🔥3🤯2

18 Jan 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,310 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

🤩 | Next Free Presets

  1. Text's36%
  2. Color Corrections (CC)36%
  3. Effects22%
  4. Anything else (comment below)6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1383

27 Dec 2025, 17:08 UTC≈6,430 views39 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

📸 | Flash Cutout Transition | Project | Alight Motion📱 🎮 This project contains: - Flash Cutout Animation - Zoom + Shake (Pre-Drop) - Hard Shake + Zoom ⚙️ Characteristics: - Project - Editable - Easy to use - Just copy and link 🎮 Presets: https://zickfx.com/b/cutout - Alight Link: https://alight.link/jzKip8wbT8xummCH8 👽 Zick | Editing Hub | 🛒 | 🏢 @ZickHub

🔥178🫡7❤‍🔥4🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @editinghublab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jan 2026, 16:00 UTCFinal Results175 voters

🤩 | Next Free Presets

  1. Text's36%
  2. Color Corrections (CC)36%
  3. Effects22%
  4. Anything else (comment below)6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Oct 2025, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll350 voters

Do you want this tutorial, but for After Effects? 🖥

  1. Yes!70%
  2. No30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2025 to 22 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 419,096 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HOBO Edits
@hobo_edits · 47,464
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 26 August 2026
haηcɣsquad🎗️
@hancybox · 68,266
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 20 August 2026
Shahfaiz_Editz
@shahfaiz_editz · 58,914
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 22 August 2026
S TECHZ
@stechzyt · 85,898
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zick | Editing Hub” (@editinghublab), 6,555 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editinghublab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.