Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فایل‌های گرافیکی | آموزش ادیت با موبایل🪻

Channel

فایل‌های گرافیکی | آموزش ادیت با موبایل🪻

@editor_afroogh

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,465subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001899712114
TypeChannel
Username@editor_afroogh
CreatedBetween 1 December 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/editor_afroogh

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4353,4653,45017 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,437 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,447 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,457 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,461 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,460 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,463 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,459 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,465 subscribers17 August 202614 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 27 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,431–3,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 00:573,465+6
9 Sept 2026, 21:403,459-4
4 Sept 2026, 19:413,463+3
29 Aug 2026, 21:273,460-1
27 Aug 2026, 04:023,461+4
24 Aug 2026, 11:533,457+10
20 Aug 2026, 23:473,447+10
17 Aug 2026, 22:323,437+2
17 Aug 2026, 16:463,435first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10680.9%
🔥1713.0%
👍32.29%
😍32.29%
👎21.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026
File

#برنامه آپدیت افتر موشن

1

16 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC306 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

پست جدیدم فونت هایی ک باهم ست میشن https://www.instagram.com/p/DcGY9HbDB8I/?igsh=YXd0NnV3MjRueWFy شب فونت هارو اپلود میکنم ک نت بهتری هست. ممنونم🪻 فونت های دیگخ هم تو کانالم هست فقط کافیه #فونت سرچ کنی تا پیداشون کنی

3🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC379 views88 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

اموزش اینکه چجوری اینجوری اسکرین شات هاتون ساده نزارید و خوشگل بزارید رو بزارم یا بلدید؟ - بزارم ری اکشن❤️( باید به ۷۵ تا برسه میزارم) - نزارم ری اکشن👎🏻

87👎1

15 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC425 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026

پست جدید از دست ندید اپدیت دوره https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcD7w5Zsfg5/?igsh=MW43Zjc1b2M1ZWV2MQ==

🔥61

14 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC456 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

دوست دارین چی براتون برارم؟ آموزشی پکی چیزی

3👍2

13 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC557 viewsread 17 August 2026
Poll

ببینم برا پرامپت بعدی کدوم بیشتر طرفدار داره؟😉

  1. ذخترااا57%
  2. پسرااا44%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC514 viewsread 17 August 2026

Create an ultra-realistic editorial fashion portrait based on the reference image. FACE REPLACEMENT — HIGHEST PRIORITY: Replace only the male subject’s face with the face from the newly uploaded reference photo. Preserve the uploaded face with maximum identity fidelity: exact facial structure, face shape, forehead, cheekbones, jawline, chin, eyes, eyelids, eyebrows, nose shape and width, lips, mouth proportions, ear

13 Aug 2026, 21:28 UTC528 viewsread 17 August 2026

The result must look like an authentic, professionally photographed Sony α7 IV portrait, as if the person in the uploaded face reference was naturally photographed in the exact scene, pose, clothing, lighting and composition of the target image.

13 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC393 viewsread 17 August 2026

Use the uploaded face image as the exact identity reference and replace only the face of the person in the reference photo. Preserve the face 100% exactly—same facial structure, eyes, nose, lips, jawline, proportions, skin texture, natural asymmetry, age, and all distinctive features. Do not beautify, reshape, stylize, or alter the identity in any way. Recreate the reference photo exactly: young man sitting at a tab

13 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC358 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

پرامپت دوم واسه پسراا #پرامپت - پرامپت در پیام بعدی

13 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC377 viewsread 17 August 2026

2/3 - یکبار به ارامی کلیک کنیذ کپی میشه Preserve: * exact eye spacing * exact eye shape * exact eyebrow structure * exact nose geometry * exact lips and mouth proportions * exact jawline * exact cheek structure * exact chin * exact facial hair distribution * exact skin tone * exact natural facial asymmetry * exact apparent age * exact ethnic/facial characteristics of the reference person Do not make the person mo

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @editor_afroogh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

ببینم برا پرامپت بعدی کدوم بیشتر طرفدار داره؟😉

  1. ذخترااا57%
  2. پسرااا44%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حاجی لوو|Hajilow
@khodehajilow2 · 61,547
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 September 2026
نیلوفر عابدینی | طراحی با موبایل| تولید محتوا | ادیت
@niloufar_abedini · 26,518
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
طراحی با موبایل | ادیت | کارن‌ تیم
@karentteam · 89,901
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فایل‌های گرافیکی | آموزش ادیت با موبایل🪻” (@editor_afroogh), 3,465 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editor_afroogh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.