Channel
@karentteam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
90,021subscribers
+2,697 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633125859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @karentteam |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/karentteam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 90,021 | +62 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 89,959 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 89,939 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 89,954 | +28 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 89,926 | +63 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 89,863 | +71 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 89,792 | +122 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 89,670 | +380 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 89,290 | +187 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 89,103 | +89 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 89,014 | +138 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 88,876 | +1,149 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 87,727 | +451 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 87,276 | -48 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 87,324 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 87,324 | first reading |
201 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 201 (6 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 637,300 |
| Reactions total | 8,078 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,078 reactions across 201 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,233 | 77.2% | |
| 👍 | 507 | 6.28% | |
| 💔 | 353 | 4.37% | |
| 👀 | 317 | 3.92% | |
| 😍 | 316 | 3.91% | |
| 🔥 | 211 | 2.61% | |
| 👏 | 94 | 1.16% | |
| 🏆 | 30 | 0.371% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 0.111% | |
| 😘 | 8 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 201 of the 201 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,078reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 201 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این اگهی و ذکر «داشتن سابقه کاری» صرفا بخاطر اینه که میخوایم از تجربه کسی که بیشتر از ما تو این فضا کارکرده استفاده کنیم و از ایدههای جدیدش و ایدههایی که برای کارفرمایان سابقش اجرا کرده کمک بگیریم تا روند رشدمون سریعتر بشه پس اصلااااا فکر نکنید که اگه سابقه کاری نباشه نمیتونید کار پیدا کنید💕
❤48💔3
دور از جونتون اصلا اینطور نیست پشتیبانهای من خانم فریبا، اوا، مهسا، ریحانه و خانم هدیه هیچکدوووووم سابقه کار پشتیبانی نداشتن❌ فقط بخاطر سطح خوب نمونهکاراشون بود که خودمون درخواست همکاری دادیم ادمین تلگرام من خانم نازنین تا قبل ادمینی کارنتیم اصلا هیچکجاااا کار نکرده بودن همه این بچهها اولین بارشون بود که تو اون حوزه کار میکردن و برای من «سابقه کاری» اصلااااا مهم نبود ❗️شخصیت ❗️مسئولیتپذیری ❗️تعهد و وجدان …
❤53👏9
ای کسایی که دوست داشتید با مجموعه ما کار کنید، ما نیاز به یه ادمین حرفهای برای روبیکا و بله داریم ولی اول اگهی رو تو کانال هنرجوهای خودم گذاشتم چون دوست دارم کل تیم از هنرجوهای خودم باشن😆
❤29💔5
😳😳واقعا؟ چقدرررر بی شخصیت!!!
❤41💔34
کاش کارفرمای منم حقوق منو بده 🙂 متاسفانه همیشه ۵ ام به بعد حقوق منو میزنه
💔51❤4
طلا داره میره بالا ترسیدم دارم سریع حقوق بچههارو میزنم شاید بخوان امروز طلا بخرن مملکت نیست که🙂
❤36💔11
زندگی همیشه بهت یه فرصت میده که اسمش«امروزه» سلامممم امروز قشنگ🥹🤍
❤53
دو تا چیزی که خیلییییییییییی به اندازه موهای سرم ازم سوال میشد این بود که چجوری خودت انقدر خوب کمپین میذاری چجوری استوریاتو انقدر قشنگ طراحی میکنی خب من همه اینارو تو دوره نقطه قراره اپدیت بدم فقط خوشبحال هرکسی که اونموقع بهم اعتماد کرد😚 چون اصلاااا قصد ندارم حالا حالاها ثبتنامشو برای کسی باز کنم
❤69😍9👀5💔3
اموزش طراحی و دیزاین استوری😚😚 هم با ابزارای اینستاگرام هم با هوشمصنوعی هم با استیکر و پک ابزارخودمون اینا همه آپدیتای دوره نقطهاس✌🏻👍
❤56😍8🏆3
وای تازه یچیز دیگهام هست
❤15
یعنی فقط صبر کنید ببینین چه بچههایی وارد مارکت بکنم از دوره ۲۱ میلیونی کمپیننویس معروف کشور گرفته تا کسی که هیچی از کمپین حالیش نبود اموزش دیدم سکوت میکنم فقط صبر کنید اماده بشه… بزودی میبینیم که بچهها کمپینای چند صدمیلیونی رو برای کارفرما تارگت میزنن>>> اون روز نزدیکه✌🏻
❤47😍12🏆3🔥3
من دارم برای دوره نقطه کمپیننویسی رو اموزش میدم😭 سختترین کار ممکن واقعا اشکم دراومده هم برای فروشگاهیا کمپین قراره برم هم اموزشی هم خدماتی برای انواع شخصیتها و نوع رفتارشون بر اساس تست شخصیتشناسی DISC هم کمپین نوشتم😭
❤35😍3🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 201 posts we hold for @karentteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@karentteam edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تو جزو کدوم دستهای؟👇🏻
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
دوره رایگان ادیت با کپکاتو دیدی؟🫢
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 201 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“طراحی با موبایل | ادیت | کارن تیم” (@karentteam), 90,021 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karentteam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.