Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 40 days, net -723. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,607–10,559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 09:22
9,717
-89
12 Sept 2026, 10:01
9,806
-56
8 Sept 2026, 16:56
9,862
-102
3 Sept 2026, 20:59
9,964
-41
2 Sept 2026, 12:53
10,005
-14
1 Sept 2026, 09:54
10,019
-29
31 Aug 2026, 11:58
10,048
-34
30 Aug 2026, 10:39
10,082
-22
29 Aug 2026, 14:03
10,104
-20
28 Aug 2026, 10:56
10,124
-36
27 Aug 2026, 13:04
10,160
-33
26 Aug 2026, 14:53
10,193
-33
25 Aug 2026, 13:42
10,226
-31
24 Aug 2026, 13:36
10,257
-72
22 Aug 2026, 19:55
10,329
-46
21 Aug 2026, 09:07
10,375
+7
20 Aug 2026, 11:04
10,368
+2
19 Aug 2026, 13:22
10,366
-3
18 Aug 2026, 10:23
10,369
+11
17 Aug 2026, 10:42
10,358
first reading
Engagement
634 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.288%
avg views ÷ 9,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
216 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
216
of 634 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 216 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
634 (7 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
6,043
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 54 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💋
32
39.5%
🍓
23
28.4%
custom 5904308670140784595
12
14.8%
⚡
10
12.3%
😱
4
4.94%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 634 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 634 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 634 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @edmvestige. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 634 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
➴ Канал @AC1LLET открывает набор в стажёры. Вас ждёт наш приятный коллектив, готовый составить вам компанию, помочь и обучить новому, а также развивающийся канал с множеством интересных моментов для вас и ваших дальнейших воспоминаний.
ㅤ
ㅤ ADMINISTRATION RECRUITMENT
➴ Возрастные ограничения отсутствуют, документы мы не требуем.
➶ Неконфликтность и умение находить конструктивные решения в различных ситуациях.
➴ неде…
ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENT
Desaud раскрывает свои объятия, и ждет именно тебя, наша луна.
⬜⬜Норма администрации:
3 свадьбы в неделю, 10 анкет исд в день
Для подачи заявки отправьте анкету, что находится в комментариях данного поста. Отправлять её нужно в бот @VMNLKbot, как и все вопросы можете задавать туда.
⬜prophétie: Bisexual Wedding
from DE-SAUD
la sainteté — @KES1EW
descendant du soleil— ...➖kamikaze — 2
avertissement: если доступ ваш к святыне напрямую ограничен, оставьте «+» в комментарии.
ㅤ ᴀ ᴊᴏɪɴᴛ ᴏꜰ ACELLET DE MARIAGE
➴ WELCOME TO ASSOCIATIONSㅤ
Запах из детства
—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ— ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—
➴ Ассоциации. Ваша задача оставить «+» под постом и ждать. Администратор подберёт вам подходящую ассоциацию и выставит на канал. Лишнего под набором не писать.
—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ— ㅤ—ㅤ—ㅤ—
обратная сторона рынка засыпала, но не еë тёмное сердце. вот и заканчивается трудовой день у тех, кто привык собирать свою жатву под покровом тайны. на углу, где свет фонаря выхватывает лишь часть мрачного фасада, неспешно разошлись фигуры,их дело не терпит рассвета, их сделки заключены в тени, а рассчёт — в лунном свете.
но даже в этой убаюкивающей тишине, где-то там, в неприметных закоулках, продолжают тлеть угли с…
⬜prophétie: Bisexual Wedding
from DE-SAUD
la sainteté — @s2nt1z
descendant du soleil— уни➖kamikaze — 2
avertissement: если доступ ваш к святыне напрямую ограничен, оставьте «+» в комментарии.
Signed Dawn.
Showing the 12 most recent of 634 posts we hold for @edmvestige. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@edmvestige edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 634 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@edmvestige named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@hherogame named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 21 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@lvbake named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@laura_hoddenkard named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴇɴᴠᴇʀꜱ ᴅᴜ ᴍᴀʀᴄʜᴀɴᴅᴇ” (@edmvestige), 9,717 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edmvestige.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
