Channel
@virt_vp
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30,845subscribers
-584 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001769922620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @virt_vp |
| Description | owner: @svetk_mang Менеджер: @tremilan_w ОСТАЛЬНЫЕ МОШЕННИКИ! Писать по поводу вопросов и рекламы. Design by: @ktxp0rt Сетка: наш чат: @virt_poiskv навигация: @lilar_l прайс рекламы: @lilar_p СМОТРИ ЗАКРЕП! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/virt_vp |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
54.3 average views per post against 30,845 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.176%. Across the 25,081 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.68% and 23.1%, with a median of 11.7%.
| Window | 30 days (29 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 446 of 465 published in the window (446 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 24,216 |
| Mature posts only | 0.297% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 30,845 measured 28 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 25,081 channels · p10 2.87% · p25 5.68% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.1% · p90 41.3% |
| Position in cohort | 0.467th percentile · 1/67 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.094% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 98.9%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 28 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 30,845 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 30,872 | -25 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 30,897 | -57 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 30,954 | -27 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 30,981 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 30,978 | -29 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 31,007 | -44 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 31,051 | -48 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 31,099 | -61 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 31,160 | -34 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 31,194 | -45 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 31,239 | -37 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 31,276 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 31,290 | -34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 31,324 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 31,343 | -49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 31,392 | -37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 31,429 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 31,429 | first reading |
465 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 446 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 465 (6 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,216 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 465 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 465 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥹На этой прекрасной ноте администрация уходит спать и вернется в 10:00 👋 💫 Ночью вы можете выкладывать свои анкеты в нашем чате: @virt_poiskv Или также в боте: @llilaranket_bot 👉 Навигация по нашему паблику @lilar_l 🌤Голосуйте за нас!🌤 И не забывайте у нас открыт набор в админы!!Всех ждем!! https://t.me/boost/virt_vp https://t.me/boost/virt_vp https://t.me/boost/virt_vp
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Красивых и активных к нам в кф Без иниц и анкет
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
😈Ахуенных к нам в чат без нормы по бтс/бп. Влд красивый чгшка. Нотвирт — мимо.
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
«SILENZIO» — там, где интерактивы раскрываются, как мрачные лепестки орхидеи. Мы приглашаем вас в канал, где тишина между словами говорит громче криков. 🤍Здесь вас встретит тёплая, почти камерная аудитория и неизменно доброжелательные админы. В нашем кругу проходят игры, дарящие живое общение: шиппы, свидания,ассоциации и множество других занятий для души. 💎Будем искренне рады видеть вас среди своих — чтобы вы могли …
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Мы приглашаем вас в нашу новую конференцию, где нету анкет, инициалов и особых правил. Мы недавно открылись, но это не делает нас хуже, админы и участники будут рады всем Мы поддержим любой диалог, любая тема, любая шутка и любой разговор. Мы принимаем людей всех возрастов, наций, персов. Вопросы ` тгк
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Доброе утро господа Прекрасный минхо недавно открыл свой блог и хочет им поделиться с другими людьми. Мы сможем поболтать, пофлиртовать и просто спокойно поговорить. Просто найдите там в закрепе мой анон) Single switch Gay В моей необычной жизни не хватает одного маленького белого света,с которым я смог бы проводить долгое время. Может это твой шанс завоевать клубничное сердце? В общем.. вас ждёт много чего интер…
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Заберём в конференцию 16+ с небольшой нормой и хорошими участниками!) Ждем и рады всех и всем @bellcia Связь: @HTM1Nj
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
ㅤ ㅤㅤ sticks w girls for cutest 😊 хочешь найти качественные стикеры? тебе сюда! максимально быстро выполним любой твой запрос ведётся набор в админы, если у вас есть желание попробовать себя в этой сфере, то вся информация на канале. буду не против оп и вп 0+! связь : @yursiij
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
🖤 Привлекательных куколок в чат по бтс. 🖤 Нотвирт, молчуны, уроды — мимо. poupées attrayantes.
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Знакомств. @G3WST Реклама, кф и т.д. - мимо.
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Ищем админов в ахуенный чат. Если вы не собираетесь работать — мимо. Связь.
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
❤️ вайбовые треки для меломанов с 🧩/ 🧩 ➡️ качественные подборки треков несколько раз в неделю. ➡️ редкие треки, которых не встретишь в TikTok-трендах и чартах Spotify. ➡️ свободный и обаятельный владелец. ➡️ вайбовая атмосфера. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Отвечаю, если подпишешься, все омеги твои. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩
Signed Т̵р̷ͥэ͉ͣм͚и̱͑л̭ͨь̡̧̖я̸ͫн̨̢̟
Showing the 12 most recent of 465 posts we hold for @virt_vp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@virt_vp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 857,259 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@virt_vp named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ищу сп / друзейᶫᶦᶫᵃʳ” (@virt_vp), 30,845 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virt_vp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.