Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
31,600 average views per post against 9,838 subscribers — an engagement rate of 320.8%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
19 of 19 published in the window (2 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
599,604
Mature posts only
338.3% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,752–9,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:44
9,838
-10
2 Nov 2026, 07:19
9,848
+5
29 Oct 2026, 20:46
9,843
+3
26 Oct 2026, 20:55
9,840
+60
24 Oct 2026, 04:39
9,780
+1
21 Oct 2026, 12:49
9,779
-2
18 Oct 2026, 07:20
9,781
-8
15 Oct 2026, 05:40
9,789
-2
12 Oct 2026, 13:58
9,791
-17
5 Oct 2026, 21:40
9,808
-28
28 Sept 2026, 10:36
9,836
-42
15 Sept 2026, 15:40
9,878
-5
11 Sept 2026, 12:58
9,883
-13
6 Sept 2026, 17:17
9,896
-1
2 Sept 2026, 09:34
9,897
-10
30 Aug 2026, 00:37
9,907
-12
26 Aug 2026, 22:45
9,919
-26
23 Aug 2026, 12:23
9,945
-16
19 Aug 2026, 12:27
9,961
+13
16 Aug 2026, 08:28
9,948
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
321.1%
avg views ÷ 9,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
31,600
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.027%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
71 (14 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
600,148
Reactions total
161
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,360
Videos
≈211
Links
≈1,230
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
596 reactions across 70 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
256
43.0%
👍
134
22.5%
👌
103
17.3%
❤🔥
52
8.72%
🤝
26
4.36%
🙏
25
4.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 596 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (47.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅ تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۱۳ آبان
🛫چرخش نقدینگی از درآمد ثابت به سهام؛ روز سبز بورس
🕯شاخص کل بورس امروز با رشد ۱.۱ درصدی (۸۸,۰۴۲ واحد) به محدوده ۷,۹۱۲,۶۴۶ واحد رسید. نمادهای فملی، فارس، تابان و فولاد بیشترین تاثیر را بر شاخص کل داشتند.
🕯شاخص کل هموزن با رشد ۰.۶ درصدی (۱۴,۲۳۴ واحد) در محدوده ۲,۲۲۹,۰۶۹ واحد قرار گرفت. شاخص کل فرابورس نیز با افزایش ۲۹۶ واحدی، به محدوده ۶۷,۰۱۵ واحد رسید. نمادهای آریا، فزر، کگهر و شرانل بیشتری…
✅ تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۱۲ آبان
🛫پرواز شاخص همزمان با ورود سنگین پول حقیقی
🕯شاخص کل بورس امروز با رشد ۲.۳ درصدی (۱۷۵,۱۷۹ واحد) به محدوده ۷,۸۲۴,۵۸۵ واحد رسید. نمادهای فملی، فارس، فولاد و تابان بیشترین تاثیر را بر شاخص کل داشتند.
📥شاخص کل هموزن با رشد ۱.۸ درصدی (۳۹,۲۸۳ واحد) در محدوده ۲,۲۱۴,۸۲۹ واحد قرار گرفت. شاخص کل فرابورس نیز با افزایش ۱,۱۶۹ واحدی، به محدوده ۶۶,۷۱۹ واحد رسید. نمادهای آریا، کگهر، فزر و شرانل بیشترین تا…
✅تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۱۰ آبان
📉رکوردشکنی خروج نقدینگی و روز ملتهب بازار سرمایه
🕯 بازار سرمایه امروز فضایی بهشدت سرخپوش و فرساینده را تجربه کرد و با منفی شدن ۷۳ درصد نمادها همراه شد؛ بهطوریکه شاخص کل بورس با افت سنگین ۲.۴ درصدی (۱۸۴,۷۷۶ واحدی) تا سطح ۷,۶۵۴,۴۷۴ واحد عقبنشینی کرد و شاخص هموزن نیز کاهشی ۱.۴ درصدی (۳۰,۸۶۸ واحدی) را در محدوده ۲,۱۶۵,۸۷۲ واحد به ثبت رساند. شاخص فرابورس نیز با افت قابلتوجه ۹۱۶ واحدی به محد…
✅ تحلیل بازار
🗓۹ آبان
📉 عقبنشینی نماگرها و کوچ سنگین نقدینگی به دژهای امن
🕯بازار سرمایه امروز فضایی کاملاً سرخپوش را تجربه کرد و با منفی شدن ۶۵ درصد نمادها همراه شد؛ بهطوریکه شاخص کل بورس با افت ۱.۶ درصدی (۱۲۸,۷۴۵ واحدی) تا سطح ۷,۸۳۸,۸۰۵ واحد عقبنشینی کرد و شاخص هموزن نیز کاهشی ۰.۶ درصدی را ثبت کرد. شاخص فرابورس نیز با افت ۲۵۶ واحدی به محدوده ۶۶,۱۲۷ واحد رسید. فملی، فارس، شپنا و تابان بیشترین اثر منفی را بر …
✅ تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۶ آبان
↗️کامبک طوفانی نماگرها و استراحت در سنگر دفاعی
📈 بازار سرمایه امروز در حالی جانی دوباره گرفت و با سبزی ۶۸ درصدی نمادهای بازار همراه شد که شاخص کل بورس با رشد ۰.۵ درصدی (۳۹,۹۲۳ واحدی) تا سطح ۷,۹۶۷,۲۵۴ واحد پیشروی کرد؛ شاخص هموزن نیز افزایش ۰.۳ درصدی را ثبت کرد و شاخص فرابورس با ۳۹۱ واحد رشد به محدوده ۶۶,۳۸۳ واحد رسید. فملی، شپنا، شبندر و فولاد بیشترین اثر را بر شاخص کل داشتند و آریا، فزر و …
✔️ تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۵ آبان
💸فرار دستهجمعی نقدینگی از سنگر سهام و درآمد ثابت
📈 بازار سرمایه امروز در حالی با افت همهجانبه نماگرها و ریزش ۷۱ درصدی نمادهای منفی همراه شد که شاخص کل بورس با کاهش ۱.۸ درصدی (۱۴۲,۸۶۷ واحدی) تا سطح ۷,۹۲۶,۹۲۱ واحد عقبنشینی کرد؛ شاخص هموزن نیز افت ۱.۲ درصدی را ثبت کرد و شاخص فرابورس با ریزش ۹۴۷ واحدی به محدوده ۶۵,۹۹۲ واحد رسید. فملی، فارس، شپنا و تابان بیشترین اثر منفی را بر شاخص کل داشتند…
✔️تحلیل بازار
🗓 ۴ آبان
💡اقبال به بزرگان در روز واگرایی شاخصها
📈 بازار سرمایه امروز با رشد شاخص کل و افت نماگرهای هموزن و فرابورس همراه شد. شاخص کل بورس با افزایش ۰.۷ درصدی، معادل ۵۴ هزار و ۲۴۲ واحد، به محدوده ۸ میلیون و ۶۹ هزار و ۷۸۹ واحد رسید؛ در مقابل، شاخص هموزن ۰.۲ درصد افت کرد و با کاهش ۳ هزار و ۹۴۸ واحدی در سطح ۲ میلیون و ۲۲۹ هزار و ۵۸۷ واحد ایستاد. شاخص کل فرابورس نیز با افت ۱۷۵ واحدی به ۶۶ هزار و ۹۳۹ وا…
🚀پذیرهنویسی صندوق نقره «ماه» با موفقیت تکمیل شد!
از استقبال شما برای پیوستن به مسیر سرمایهگذاری در نقره سپاسگزاریم. 🚀
🎉با مشارکت بیش از ۱۲ هزار سرمایهگذاری حقیقی و تخصیص بیش از ۷۰٪ واحدهای پذیرهنویسی شده به سرمایهگذاران حقیقی
«ماه» با استقبال سرمایهگذاران مسیر خود را در بازار سرمایه آغاز کرد...
🌺از اعتماد و همراهی شما برای ورود به مسیر سرمایهگذاری در ماه سپاسگزاریم
«ماه» آغاز یک مسیر تازه برای سرمایهگ…
🚀مرحله دوم پذیرهنویسی صندوق نقره «ماه» آغاز شد!
🔹 برای خرید واحدهای صندوق نقره ماه ، نماد «ماه» را در سامانه معاملاتی خود جستوجو کنید و سفارش خریدتان را ثبت کنید.
ماه، نقره در مسیر سرمایهگذاری شما 🚀
سامانه معاملاتی بیدار
بیدار اپ
🟣گروه مالی اقتصاد بیدار🟣
💎همراه در سرمایهگذاری
📱@eghtesadebidar
📣🔹تمدید پذیرهنویسی صندوق نقره ماه
🪙با توجه به استقبال سرمایه گذاران در مرحله اول و تکمیل سقف پذیره نویسی در چند دقیقه، با مجوز سازمان بورس افزایش سقف دوباره پذیره نویسی امروز دوشنبه 4 آبان ماه انجام خواهد شد.
⏰ ساعت پذیرهنویسی : 11:45 الی 18
(از طریق سامانه معاملاتی تمام کارگزاریها)
🎯ثبت درخواست شرکت در پذیرهنویسی صندوق ماه از طریق بیدار اپ از همین الان امکان پذیر میباشد.👇👇
(ورود بدون فیلتر شکن)
https://eb…
🚀ماه حتی فرصت نداد چشم به هم بزنیم! 🌕🔥
✔️پذیرهنویسی صندوق نقره «ماه» در کمتر از چند ثانیه به پایان رسید!
👌یک شروع فراتر از انتظار، با استقبال چشمگیری که نشون داد برای فرصتهای تازه سرمایهگذاری، آمادهایم.
این تازه شروع داستان «ماه»ه... 🚀✨
#صندوق_نقره_ماه #اقتصاد_بیدار
❤7🤝5❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @eghtesadebidar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@eghtesadebidar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 76 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال رسمی آموزش مفید @mofidsecuritiesofficial · 78,763 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
گروه مالی فارابی @farabinvest · 51,270 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
آگهی استخدام تهران @estekhdam_tehran · 33,549 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
سفرنگار @SafarNegar · 34,438 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
بیدار بورس @bidarbourse · 27,412 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
استخدام های استان تهران @eestekhdam_tehran · 65,209 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کارگزاری بیدار” (@eghtesadebidar), 9,838 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eghtesadebidar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.