Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЕГОР ШИП❤️

Channel

ЕГОР ШИП❤️

@egorkaship_bs

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

32,185subscribers

+1,726 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670497670
TypeChannel
Username@egorkaship_bs
Description🌑 Концерты: +7 926 420 5699 (Мария) 🌑 Реклама: +7 963 648 0790 (Марк) https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6788aabf8e552d6b54c40e9b&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/egorkaship_bs

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,45433,21331,833.56 August 2026 — 30,459 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,459 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,454 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,620 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,621 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,987 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,386 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,543 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,698 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,766 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,878 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,984 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,175 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,213 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,194 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,136 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,053 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,971 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,889 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,833 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,818 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,783 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,768 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,760 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,736 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,671 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,614 subscribers4 September 2026 — 32,567 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,475 subscribers9 September 2026 — 32,348 subscribers12 September 2026 — 32,297 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,267 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,229 subscribers17 September 2026 — 32,185 subscribers32,1856 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,726. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,040–33,627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:5532,185-44
15 Sept 2026, 13:5732,229-38
13 Sept 2026, 20:0132,267-30
12 Sept 2026, 01:0032,297-51
9 Sept 2026, 13:1732,348-127
6 Sept 2026, 07:1532,475-92
4 Sept 2026, 02:1632,567-47
2 Sept 2026, 19:5932,614-57
1 Sept 2026, 15:1232,671-65
31 Aug 2026, 18:1632,736-24
30 Aug 2026, 15:1332,760-8
29 Aug 2026, 17:4332,768-15
28 Aug 2026, 20:3232,783-18
27 Aug 2026, 19:2432,801-17
26 Aug 2026, 20:4632,818-15
25 Aug 2026, 19:5432,833-56
24 Aug 2026, 20:0832,889-82
23 Aug 2026, 08:0632,971-82
21 Aug 2026, 17:3633,053-83
20 Aug 2026, 16:0633,136first reading

Engagement

149 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 32,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 149 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held149 (29 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total334,180
Reactions total15,225
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
656
Videos
423
Links
474

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

73,286 reactions across 140 posts, in 73 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49,91368.1%
❤‍🔥5,1136.98%
💋4,8096.56%
🔥4,2235.76%
💘2,1882.99%
🥰1,6542.26%
🤮6630.905%
🖕6620.903%
👍5390.735%
😱4860.663%
😁4830.659%
😭3930.536%
🤣2480.338%
💔2180.297%
🤯1740.237%
😍1430.195%
👎1420.194%
😐810.111%
💯790.108%
🤡770.105%
53 further kinds9981.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76,299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC≈2,220 views235 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤183💘25😁16💋4🤮3🖕2👍1🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,380 views257 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤211💋22💘12👏5🤮3👍2🖕2

24 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC≈3,090 views304 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Завтра еще один сниппет, пипец красивый 😍😍😍

❤198❤‍🔥57💋33🔥9🤮5🥰2

24 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC≈3,370 views260 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Завтра новый сниппет😍

❤189❤‍🔥40💋26🤮3🔥2

24 Sept 2026, 15:51 UTC≈3,350 views448 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤301❤‍🔥73💋41😍15🕊7🤮6💩3👎2

23 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈5,110 views346 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Накидайте комментов, че вы ленитесь, 32.000 лентяев в группе

❤251🥰37💋25🤮8❤‍🔥7😁6👍3👎3

23 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC≈5,300 views305 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Егор Романтикович его звали

❤235💘43❤‍🔥12🤮5💋4🥰2👍1👎1

23 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC≈5,280 views257 reactionsread 24 September 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdoJUcLAuxs/?stkn=MWl3ZXdzYWM3ZzZmbA==

❤202💘24💋13🤮6❤‍🔥5👍3😡2👎1

23 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈5,480 views310 reactionsread 24 September 2026

30 минут !

❤245💋28🔥19🤮7💅3❤‍🔥2🥰2👍1

22 Sept 2026, 15:54 UTC≈6,600 views566 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Завтра в 14:00

❤397❤‍🔥101🤔25🔥16🤮8💋5💯5🏆4

21 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC≈7,540 views609 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤431🔥78💘38❤‍🔥26🤮9👀6👍6🖕5

21 Sept 2026, 12:20 UTC≈7,460 views393 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Сниппеты готовы к запуску

❤298🔥36❤‍🔥24🤮15👀6💋5👎4🖕2

Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @egorkaship_bs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 743,409
#1
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 225,418
#2
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,355
#3
Derouse
@derouseofficial · 950
#4
Аслан Шукаша👷🏻
@aslanshukasha · 294,343
#5
МОФК || Егор Шип 🖤
@mofcegorship · 157
#6
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 704,353
#7
Молодой Платон
@givemebapestories · 50,760
#8
КЛАВА КОКА
@klavacoca · 253,555
#9
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 286,257
#10
Гаврилина зе бест :3
@Gavril1nna · 141,494
#11
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 190,108
#12
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146
#13
𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐬_📚
@bookdraftss · 243
#14
Милашкина
@milashkina_nekrasova · 251,260
#15
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 253,446
#16
Зум
@zvezdach_zoom · 29,747
#17
КИРИЛЛ СКРИПНИК
@kirskripnik · 2,196
#18
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 846,365
#19
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 502,219
#20
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158
#21
Стив
@iamsteeeeeev · 298
#22
РУЗИЛЬ МИНЕКАЕВ
@real_ruzil · 158,817
#23
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,059,475
#24
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 645,706
#25
Бустер 🍄
@bigpencil · 1,204,470
#26
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,569,936
#27
ВАНЯ ДМИТРИЕНКО
@vaneckavanushka · 166,367
#28
DILARA
@dilalara753 · 272,768
#29
кристюшкина😋
@mskaramelka01 · 292,665
#30
МУЗ-ТВ
@muztv · 112,458
#31
MIKE SOTNIKOV 🃏- Михаил Сотников
@mike_sotnikov · 63,781
#32
Влад Бумага A4
@A4omg · 445,051
#33
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,690
#34
Лениногорск
@leninogorsk_novosti · 11,166
#35
Ваша Аля
@enikeeva_aliya1 · 239,718
#36
daryana
@d_gallavichh · 88,874
#37
Глент 🚀
@vladglenttg · 576,068
#38
КАТЯ ДИМА
@katyashkuro · 161,546
#39
BUDA +
@budaog · 358,953
#40
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 237,557
#41
SASHA_STONE
@sasha_stone13 · 34,706
#42
Милана Хаметова
@MILASHKINATELEGKA · 208,530
#43

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gufee Medalin
@gufeemed · 49,853
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026
MIA BOYKA 🔱
@MIABOYKA3 · 36,433
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q102261214 on Wikidata, read 20 September 2026
LabelEgor Ship
DescriptionRussian singer
YouTubeUCBfJ30FMjlKHVjZf4WcJMxA

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Egor Ship (en.wikipedia.org)
“…People]]" since 18 December 2025.{{Cite web |title=ЕГОР ШИП❤️ |url=https://t.me/egorkaship_bs/4480 |access-date=2026-01-12 |website=Telegram}} ==…”
read 13 September 2026
Шип, Егор (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…(партия)|Новые люди]]» с 18 декабря 2025 года{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/egorkaship_bs/4480|title=ЕГОР ШИП❤️|website=Telegram|access-date=2026-01…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЕГОР ШИП❤️” (@egorkaship_bs), 32,185 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egorkaship_bs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.