Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net +464. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115,233–116,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 11:06
116,323
+48
7 Nov 2026, 07:47
116,275
+167
6 Nov 2026, 09:56
116,108
+120
5 Nov 2026, 06:40
115,988
+24
4 Nov 2026, 08:38
115,964
+95
3 Nov 2026, 10:16
115,869
+47
2 Nov 2026, 12:36
115,822
+37
1 Nov 2026, 13:05
115,785
+11
31 Oct 2026, 09:56
115,774
-35
30 Oct 2026, 11:59
115,809
-32
29 Oct 2026, 15:19
115,841
-8
28 Oct 2026, 17:29
115,849
-50
27 Oct 2026, 14:16
115,899
-26
26 Oct 2026, 17:39
115,925
-41
25 Oct 2026, 16:41
115,966
-17
24 Oct 2026, 17:50
115,983
+18
23 Oct 2026, 14:20
115,965
-26
22 Oct 2026, 16:07
115,991
-48
21 Oct 2026, 11:20
116,039
-19
20 Oct 2026, 12:26
116,058
first reading
Engagement
1,544 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 116,323 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,500
476 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
476
of 1,544 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
1,544 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
13,573,150
Reactions total
185,127
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 17:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈39,000
Videos
≈11,500
Links
≈26,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 59m
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 349 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
378,409 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
108,187
28.6%
😢
85,893
22.7%
🙏
52,278
13.8%
❤
42,467
11.2%
😁
33,427
8.83%
👍
14,618
3.86%
🤯
10,719
2.83%
😱
10,265
2.71%
🔥
8,308
2.20%
👏
4,249
1.12%
🤔
4,025
1.06%
😈
2,592
0.685%
🫡
1,051
0.278%
🍓
330
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378,409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
101
across the posts below
Posts paid on
60
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ekrd_glavniy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 366 of 476 posts held from the last 30 days (76.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴Двоє загиблих і семеро поранених: майже 40 атак на Дніпропетровщину
Протягом дня росіяни били по шести районах області дронами, артилерією та авіабомбою.
У Дніпрі та на Нікопольщині загинули по одній людині. У Павлограді 42-річного чоловіка госпіталізували у важкому стані.
Пошкоджені житлові будинки, автомобілі, склади та інфраструктура.
🪖Тих, хто виїжджає з окупації, чи повертається з-за кордону, зараз можна законно одразу мобілізовувати, — нардеп Козир
Каже, що цей момент активно використовує російське ІПСО!
😏Тому нардеп пропонує зробити їм 90 дней відстрочки, а вже потім мобілізувати
Давайте зробимо 90 днів відстрочки тим, хто повертається з окупації чи з-за кордону. Ми їх зустрічаємо і даємо повістку, і через 90 днів ви повинні з'явитись в ТЦК…
💡В Днепре опять масштабный блэкаут, заявил мэр города Борис Филатов
В городе полностью остановился электротранспорт, поскольку все тяговые подстанции обесточены. На маршруты выводят дополнительные автобусы. Метро не ходит и пригодно только в качестве укрытия.
На левом берегу водоснабжение запускают от генераторов, на правом энергетики работают над восстановлением электроснабжения. Работу канализации удалось стабили…
🧾Почти миллиард за воду: сколько криворожане должны водоканалу и почему это бьёт по всем
Мы узнали одну цифру, и первая мысль после неё: как, бляха, наш водоканал вообще ещё работает?
998 611 000 гривен. Столько криворожане задолжали «Кривбасводоканалу» за воду на 1 октября 2026 года.
До миллиарда не хватало меньше 1,4 миллиона. Свежую цифру на 1 ноября водоканал пока не называл, но куда всё идёт, вы и сами понимае…
💡После новых ударов РФ по энергетике в шести областях Украины произошли отключения света,- заявляет Минэнерго
❗️Самая сложная ситуация - в Днепропетровской области, где повреждено большое количество важных энергообъектов. Там действуют экстренные аварийные отключения.
В ночь на 8 ноября и утром российские войска атаковали ряд энергообъектов. Новые обесточивания зафиксированы в Днепропетровской, Житомирской, Ровенск…
🚀Автогаз взлетит до 67 грн/литр уже в течение двух недель
И при таких условиях АЗС не будет смысла его закупать, он может вообще пропасть с продажи,- эксперт по энергетическому рынку, директор консалтинговой группы «А-95
🙄Да… ебать его в рот, как говорил классик
Подписаться 👍 Instagram🟥
👇Прислать новость
@EKRD_info
💡 Дніпропетровщина: ворог знову масовано атакує енергетику
Через нічну атаку пошкоджені важливі енергообʼєкти області.
Без світла залишилися понад 600 тисяч мешканців області в Павлоградському, Самарівському, Камʼянському, Дніпровському районах та в самому місті Дніпрі.
Енергетики області вже працюють, щоб повернути електроенергію. Роботи ускладнюються повторними атаками.
Першочергова задача - заживити критичну …
🔴 Понад 10 разів ворог атакував чотири райони безпілотниками
У Дніпровському та Кам’янському районах пошкоджена інфраструктура.
На Нікопольщині противник цілив по райцентру та Покровській громаді. Понівечений багатоквартирний будинок.
У Дубовиківській громаді Синельниківського району пошкоджена приватна оселя. Сталася пожежа.
Сухая Балка, что у вас там происходит? 😲
Подписаться 👍 Instagram🟥
👇Прислать новость
@EKRD_info
🙏160🤯67❤25😁18👏5👍4😱4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,544 posts we hold for @ekrd_glavniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ekrd_glavniy edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ekrd_glavniy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 September 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ekrd_glavniy named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@olegart_concert named in 1 post, 21 October 2026 – 21 October 2026
@purr_catcafe named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НА ЧАСІ: Кривий Ріг @nachasi_news · 21,911 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
КРИВИЙ РІГ / БЛОГ @krivoy_rog_blog · 23,627 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
1KR.UA | Перший Криворізький | Новини Кривий Ріг @news_1kr · 25,828 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
Кривий Ріг⚡️Новини @kr_insider · 27,104 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
Олександр Вілкул @vilkul · 41,919 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
РУДАНА. НОВИНИ. КРИВИЙ РІГ @rudanatv · 57,919 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Перший Міський. Кривий Ріг @onekrua1 · 76,584 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
ТИПОВИЙ КРИВИЙ РІГ @typical_KR · 105,023 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
Труха⚡️Кривий Ріг @truexakrivojrog · 160,345 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
СВОЇ | Кривий Ріг @svoiKR · 276,255 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
Типове Криворіжжя | Новини @tp_krr · 21,109 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
🇺🇦Оборона Кривбасу @pvoukraine7 · 34,017 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 September 2026
‼️СИРЕНА‼️Кривий Ріг ОФІЦІЙНИЙ @sirena_kryvyi_rih · 132,929 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
HKR @hyevuy_k_r · 153,704 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Дніпропетровський Купол @alerts_dniproo · 38,997 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Дніпро Радар | Тривога @dnipro_alertsx · 53,707 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 11 September 2026
Новини⚡️Центральної України @center_insider · 29,703 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
🇺🇦 TERNY_KR | Тернівський район | Кривий Ріг @terny_kr · 31,628 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
1⃣ Майстерня_КR @IMS_KR_TM · 135,498 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 September 2026
ПЕРШИЙ ОФІЦІЙНИЙ @pershiy_ukr · 60,271 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 September 2026
Дніпровський пише @dnipro_pishet · 52,317 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Виплати ЗСУ ТРО ССО НГУ СБС @vyplaty_zsu · 42,911 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
Тривога України | Радар @kiev_nebo · 541,994 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Дніпро Alerts 🚀 🚨 @dnipro_alerts · 811,078 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Это Кривой Рог, ДЕТКА😈” (@ekrd_glavniy), 116,323 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekrd_glavniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.