Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elena Cherevata

Channel

Elena Cherevata

@elenacherevata

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,448subscribers

-2,187 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747598001
TypeChannel
Username@elenacherevata
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/elenacherevata

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

33,44835,63534,541.57 August 2026 — 35,635 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,630 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,575 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,537 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,495 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,455 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,401 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,341 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,292 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,265 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,234 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,213 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,195 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,157 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,122 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,107 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,065 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,038 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,003 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,955 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34,932 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,901 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34,882 subscribers3 September 2026 — 34,835 subscribers4 September 2026 — 34,794 subscribers7 September 2026 — 34,686 subscribers10 September 2026 — 34,586 subscribers12 September 2026 — 34,538 subscribers14 September 2026 — 34,493 subscribers16 September 2026 — 34,428 subscribers18 September 2026 — 34,357 subscribers2 October 2026 — 34,053 subscribers7 October 2026 — 34,202 subscribers11 October 2026 — 34,125 subscribers14 October 2026 — 34,052 subscribers15 October 2026 — 34,024 subscribers16 October 2026 — 34,010 subscribers17 October 2026 — 33,990 subscribers18 October 2026 — 33,971 subscribers19 October 2026 — 33,952 subscribers20 October 2026 — 33,937 subscribers21 October 2026 — 33,910 subscribers22 October 2026 — 33,878 subscribers23 October 2026 — 33,851 subscribers24 October 2026 — 33,830 subscribers25 October 2026 — 33,796 subscribers26 October 2026 — 33,753 subscribers27 October 2026 — 33,735 subscribers28 October 2026 — 33,727 subscribers29 October 2026 — 33,685 subscribers30 October 2026 — 33,642 subscribers31 October 2026 — 33,625 subscribers1 November 2026 — 33,603 subscribers2 November 2026 — 33,557 subscribers3 November 2026 — 33,539 subscribers4 November 2026 — 33,522 subscribers5 November 2026 — 33,477 subscribers6 November 2026 — 33,454 subscribers6 November 2026 — 33,448 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -2,187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,120–35,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 22:1733,448-6
6 Nov 2026, 00:2533,454-23
5 Nov 2026, 02:0033,477-45
4 Nov 2026, 04:3933,522-17
3 Nov 2026, 06:5633,539-18
2 Nov 2026, 10:0033,557-46
1 Nov 2026, 07:4533,603-22
31 Oct 2026, 09:4433,625-17
30 Oct 2026, 12:5533,642-43
29 Oct 2026, 10:4933,685-42
28 Oct 2026, 11:0633,727-8
27 Oct 2026, 13:0633,735-18
26 Oct 2026, 14:0133,753-43
25 Oct 2026, 14:0433,796-34
24 Oct 2026, 12:3433,830-21
23 Oct 2026, 15:0033,851-27
22 Oct 2026, 14:5733,878-32
21 Oct 2026, 09:2733,910-27
20 Oct 2026, 07:5033,937-15
19 Oct 2026, 04:5733,952first reading

Engagement

218 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.53%
avg views ÷ 33,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,520
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 218 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held218 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total161,140
Reactions total13,960
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 29s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

52,199 reactions across 218 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤34,86466.8%
❤‍🔥9,32917.9%
👍1,9423.72%
🔥1,6993.25%
💘1,4092.70%
🥰1,0912.09%
😍1,0632.04%
😁2590.496%
🍓2070.397%
🤩1870.358%
🎉1490.285%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 218 of the 218 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 218 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elenacherevata. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 218 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (1.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 12:52 UTC≈7,130 views191 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Вчера мы были на фотосессии ✨ Получились действительно невероятные кадры. Уже не терпится поделиться ими с вами. А пока ловите немного бэкстейджа со съёмки !

❤131❤‍🔥28🥰17🔥10👍2💘2🎉1

5 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,640 views223 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Тайная жизнь домашних животных 😂

❤169❤‍🔥33🥰12😁5😍3👍1

4 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,260 views248 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @CherevatyiVladVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥150❤64🥰14🔥10💘4😍4👍2

4 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,130 views178 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Как проходят ваши 12 недель? 🤩Путь стал действительно сложнее, чем в первые недели. И, честно, мне тоже хотелось всё бросить. Но, кажется, именно сейчас самое время напомнить себе, зачем мы вообще начали. В начале всегда много вдохновения, новых идей и энергии. А потом приходит обычная жизнь: дела, усталость, сомнения, нехватка времени. И именно в такие моменты проверяется не наша мотивация, а наше желание что-то из…

❤141❤‍🔥26🥰8🔥2😍1

4 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,900 views222 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤172❤‍🔥30🥰11💘6😍2👍1

3 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,150 views213 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Окружение меняет нас сильнее, чем мы думаем. Мы незаметно перенимаем привычки, взгляды и отношение к жизни тех, кто рядом. Одни люди помогают нам поверить в себя, мечтать смелее и выходить за привычные рамки, другие — наоборот, заставляют сомневаться в собственных силах. Поэтому мне кажется, очень важно выбирать окружение, рядом с которым хочется расти, развиваться и открывать в себе новые стороны. Согласны? Замеча…

❤‍🔥127❤59👍18🥰6😍2💘1

2 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC≈2,220 views201 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

погуляли всей семьей по оранжерее 🪻 Я бы с удовольствием создала такую оранжерею у себя дома — представьте, как здорово каждый день просыпаться среди этой красоты, пить утренний кофе и чувствовать себя словно в маленьком ботаническом саду. Настоящее место силы и вдохновения!

❤156❤‍🔥25🔥8😍5👍3🥰3💘1

1 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,580 views233 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @CherevatyiVladVideo

Мини-влог с поездки ! 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣

❤164❤‍🔥31👍16🔥11🥰6💘2😍2😁1

1 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,730 views289 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @CherevatyiVladPhoto

Друзья, вы уже знаете, что мы с Леной отправились в небольшое путешествие по Золотому кольцу! 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ За время поездки мы увидели много красивых и атмосферных мест, получили огромное количество впечатлений и, конечно, сняли для вас много интересного контента. Хотите увидеть, как прошло наше путешествие ?

❤211🔥33❤‍🔥27🥰6😍6👍3💘3

31 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC≈2,330 views205 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ну и, конечно, не могли обойти стороной местные храмы ⛪️ В Плёсе они особенно очаровательные: небольшие, уютные, с красивыми куполами и своей особенной атмосферой. Кажется, будто каждый из них — часть старой русской истории.

❤162❤‍🔥26😍15🥰2

31 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,380 views198 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В Плёсе особенно чувствуется русский колорит 👩‍🦰 Старинные деревянные домики, резные наличники, уютные улочки, купола церквей, неспешная жизнь и невероятные волжские пейзажи.

❤156🔥20❤‍🔥16🥰2😍2💘1🤩1

31 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,860 views176 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Здесь мы заглянули в музейный центр «Дом-музей Левитана» — место, связанное с художником Исааком Левитаном, который очень любил Плёс и находил здесь вдохновение для своих работ 🖼 Именно здесь он написал множество известных пейзажей, передав в них красоту русской природы, Волги и тихой провинциальной жизни. Такие места помогают не просто познакомиться с историей, но и почувствовать атмосферу времени, в котором жил …

❤136❤‍🔥21😍11🍓6🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 218 posts we hold for @elenacherevata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTCAnonymous Poll261 voters

Определили цели?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет15%
  3. Не хочу14%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTCAnonymous Poll224 voters

Было?

  1. Дааа86%
  2. Нет21%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Череватый Влад || Official
@CherevatyiVlad · 239,742
#1
PEVCHAYA
@PEVCHAYAi · 28,152
#2
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,492
#3
ARTYOM CHERNYSHOV
@artyemofficial · 1,882
#4
Саманта Адам
@samanta_adam · 10,867
#5
secret garden 2
@mantra366oi · 2,589
#6
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,884
#7
vrlona
@vrrlona · 1,281
#8
𝑩𝒚𝒕𝒗𝒂𝒂𝒆♡
@bytvaae · 1,540
#9
ИРИНА ИГНАТЕНКО
@irinaaaign · 3,170
#10
матвиксф💋💋
@matvxf_j · 1,359
#11
нᴀᴩᴇɜᴏᴋ ᴏᴛ 𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨♡
@narezokotsherro · 1,451
#12
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 843,809
#13
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 179,258
#14
Надежда Шевченко
@mnogolikmagic · 28,571
#15
𝒰𝓃𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝑜𝒻 𝒦&𝐿&𝐵 🔮
@bitvakerrofan · 2,850
#16
bitva.sluhi 🪬| Битва экстрасенсов| Битва Сильнейших | Битва Слухи
@bitvasluhi · 1,173
#17
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,917
#18
enina24
@ane4ka24 · 103,582
#19
димаксвл
@dimaxwl2 · 1,117
#20
Патриция Адам | ПРОСНИСЬ
@magia_vokrug · 2,160
#21
ʍиᴩ 𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙤♡
@psychics_meow1 · 307
#22
ОЛЕГ ШЕПС || ЕДИНСТВЕННЫЙ НАСТОЯЩИЙ
@olegshepsoriginal · 121,328
#23
подвал олега
@podval565 · 19,002
#24
Илья Ларионов
@larionovshow · 15,861
#25
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,760
#26
DARSI 🪄🧚‍♀️
@dsimakowa · 10,406
#27
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,779
#28
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,594
#29
Женевьева Шулик ⛦
@black13_moon · 2,286
#30
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,917
#31
Битва экстрасенсов - Дилаурентис
@dilawrentisss · 44,324
#32
Разумный Спойлер
@razuummm · 1,474
#33
Экстра Битва🔮
@extrabitva_official · 6,472
#34
битва колдунов - ЭКСТРАСЕНСЫ РЕВАНШ 3.🪐
@bitvakoldynov668 · 17,484
#35
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,106,024
#36
В комнате с сильнейшими🪄
@diegSheeev · 1,654
#37
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 732,691
#38
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,385
#39
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 296,159
#40
Экстра-Сплетни
@ExtranewsBS · 1,211
#41
БАБСКАЯ КУРИЛКА
@kurilkabyma · 167
#42
🫂𝐞𝐥𝐤𝐬𝐬_𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐩𝐬𝐬🫂
@elkkinnss · 514 (as read 3 September 2026)
#43
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 606,183
#44
𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢
@bestremi · 1,392
#45
𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘃𝗲𝗲𝘃𝘅𝘃𝗶𝗯𝗲
@matveevxvibe · 1,985
#46
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,654
#47
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,116
#48
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,742
#49
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,573
#50
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 230,262
#51
GEN Production
@genproductionru · 9,180
#52
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 234,326
#53

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Череватый Влад || Official
@CherevatyiVlad · 239,742
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
PEVCHAYA
@PEVCHAYAi · 28,152
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,884
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
Надежда Шевченко
@mnogolikmagic · 28,571
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,492
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,917
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 September 2026
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,742
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 August 2026
подвал олега
@podval565 · 19,002
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 October 2026
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,594
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 September 2026
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,116
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 September 2026
Виктория Райдос
@viktoriaraidosru · 48,006
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,760
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,779
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
Елена Голунова
@golunovachannel · 32,335
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 296,159
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elena Cherevata” (@elenacherevata), 33,448 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenacherevata.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.