Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PEVCHAYA

Channel

PEVCHAYA

@PEVCHAYAi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,152subscribers

-5,969 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783742598
TypeChannel
Username@PEVCHAYAi
DescriptionИрина Певчая. Экстрасенс и таролог, участница Битва Экстрасенсов. Делаю честные расклады Таро, помогаю понять ситуацию и найти верное направление. 💌 Запись на расклады: @Pevchayacons
Created12 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PEVCHAYAi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@PEVCHAYAi/7181 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC@pevchaya666/16931 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC1.001.7 hours
@PEVCHAYAi/7182 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC@pevchaya666/16961 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC1.0026 minutes
@PEVCHAYAi/7186 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC@pevchaya666/17023 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.008 minutes
@PEVCHAYAi/7188 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC@pevchaya666/17044 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC1.006 minutes
@PEVCHAYAi/7189 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC@pevchaya666/17054 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC1.007 minutes
@PEVCHAYAi/7193 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC@pevchaya666/17065 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@pevchaya66610 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutesthis entry (10–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @PEVCHAYAi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,14634,12131,133.57 August 2026 — 34,121 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,112 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,083 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,057 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,033 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,002 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,973 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,942 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,964 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,935 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,878 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,845 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,828 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,798 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,767 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,732 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,685 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,661 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,628 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,609 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,565 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,543 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,517 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,495 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,461 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,443 subscribers4 September 2026 — 33,427 subscribers6 September 2026 — 33,369 subscribers10 September 2026 — 33,341 subscribers12 September 2026 — 33,295 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,265 subscribers15 September 2026 — 33,221 subscribers17 September 2026 — 33,156 subscribers28 September 2026 — 32,987 subscribers5 October 2026 — 33,011 subscribers9 October 2026 — 33,001 subscribers13 October 2026 — 32,982 subscribers14 October 2026 — 32,957 subscribers15 October 2026 — 32,945 subscribers16 October 2026 — 32,922 subscribers17 October 2026 — 32,904 subscribers18 October 2026 — 32,873 subscribers19 October 2026 — 32,858 subscribers21 October 2026 — 32,843 subscribers22 October 2026 — 32,817 subscribers23 October 2026 — 32,818 subscribers24 October 2026 — 32,792 subscribers25 October 2026 — 32,824 subscribers26 October 2026 — 32,825 subscribers27 October 2026 — 32,818 subscribers28 October 2026 — 28,146 subscribers29 October 2026 — 28,153 subscribers30 October 2026 — 28,154 subscribers31 October 2026 — 28,164 subscribers1 November 2026 — 28,207 subscribers2 November 2026 — 28,187 subscribers4 November 2026 — 28,171 subscribers5 November 2026 — 28,168 subscribers6 November 2026 — 28,152 subscribers28,1527 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -5,969. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,250–35,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:3728,152-16
5 Nov 2026, 05:1528,168-3
4 Nov 2026, 01:4928,171-16
2 Nov 2026, 23:0428,187-20
1 Nov 2026, 23:0128,207+43
31 Oct 2026, 20:2828,164+10
30 Oct 2026, 19:1928,154+1
29 Oct 2026, 17:2828,153+7
28 Oct 2026, 17:1728,146-4,672
27 Oct 2026, 13:4132,818-7
26 Oct 2026, 16:2132,825+1
25 Oct 2026, 17:2832,824+32
24 Oct 2026, 13:5632,792-26
23 Oct 2026, 10:4132,818+1
22 Oct 2026, 12:0432,817-26
21 Oct 2026, 03:1532,843-15
19 Oct 2026, 22:1532,858-15
18 Oct 2026, 23:5532,873-31
17 Oct 2026, 20:2632,904-18
16 Oct 2026, 17:3732,922first reading

Engagement

254 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.15%
avg views ÷ 28,152 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,580
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 254 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held254 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total182,940
Reactions total8,386
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈685
Links
≈412

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

29,988 reactions across 251 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19,74065.8%
❤‍🔥5,21217.4%
🔥2,1347.12%
🥰1,5225.08%
🤣5241.75%
👍4111.37%
👏2440.814%
💔1460.487%
🫡350.117%
👻100.033%
😭100.033%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 251 of the 254 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,988 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 254 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 72 posts held from the last 30 days (1.39%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,170 views127 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ Сегодня могут напомнить о себе люди или события из прошлого. Возможны неожиданные сообщения от старых знакомых, приятные воспоминания, встречи или ситуации, которые заставят ненадолго вернуться мыслями к прежним временам. Также карта может говорить о поддержке, добрых жестах и простом человеческом тепле, которого порой так не хватает. Но не стоит идеализировать прошлое и забывать, почему некоторые исто…

❤89❤‍🔥24🥰9🔥5

5 Nov 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,440 views63 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

❌ТЕСТ: НЕ ИСТОЩАЕШЬ ЛИ ТЫ СЕБЯ САМОСТОЯТЕЛЬНО? Иногда мы ищем причины своей усталости где угодно: в людях, обстоятельствах, чужом влиянии и даже энергетических воздействиях. Но порой главный источник истощения - наши собственные привычки. Давай проверим, сколько из этих утверждений про тебя. 🔴За каждое совпадение поставь себе 1 балл. 1. Ты часто соглашаешься помочь, даже когда у самой совершенно нет сил. 2. После…

❤52❤‍🔥8👏2🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 05:06 UTC≈1,700 views163 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ Сегодня в центре внимания могут оказаться общение, встречи и приятные события. Возможны хорошие новости, приглашения, неожиданные поводы собраться с близкими или восстановить контакт с людьми, по которым вы соскучились. Не отказывайтесь от приятных встреч и не замыкайтесь в себе. Позвольте себе немного отдыха, лёгкости и общения без необходимости решать чьи-то проблемы. 🤩Вопрос дня 🤩 Вы больше любите …

❤96❤‍🔥39🔥22🥰6

4 Nov 2026, 04:35 UTC≈1,890 views125 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ Могут напомнить о себе ситуации из прошлого, незавершённые дела или люди, с которыми, казалось бы, уже всё было решено. Возможны новости, важные разговоры и моменты, когда придётся наконец посмотреть правде в глаза. То, что долго откладывалось или оставалось без ответа, может снова выйти на первый план. Не стоит цепляться за старое только потому, что оно привычно. Иногда нужно признать, что определённы…

❤89❤‍🔥24👍10💔1🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC≈1,910 views53 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🕯Почему перед любой магической работой необходима диагностика? Есть одна вещь, которую я считаю принципиально важной в практике: прежде чем что-либо делать, нужно разобраться, с чем именно вы имеете дело. Именно для этого существует диагностика. Нельзя просто выслушать человека, узнать о его проблемах в отношениях, неудачах или постоянных конфликтах и тут же назначить ему чистку, защиту или возврат негатива. Это н…

❤39🔥6👍4❤‍🔥2🥰2

3 Nov 2026, 04:17 UTC≈1,980 views171 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ День может принести приятные эмоции, душевное тепло или повод немного выдохнуть. Возможны хорошие новости, неожиданная симпатия, искренний разговор или встреча, после которой останется приятное послевкусие. Иногда даже небольшое событие способно вернуть ощущение, что впереди ещё много хорошего. Не закрывайтесь от новых впечатлений и не отмахивайтесь от проявлений заботы. Позвольте себе принимать вниман…

❤‍🔥94❤57🔥15🥰3👏2

2 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,020 views75 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🕯Что такое энергетическая защита и почему она не должна превращаться в постоянную оборону? В эзотерике энергетическую защиту часто воспринимают как своеобразный щит от чужого негатива, зависти, недобрых намерений и нежелательного воздействия. Но есть один момент, о котором говорят гораздо реже: защита не должна становиться состоянием, в котором человек живёт постоянно. Её задача - не отгородить вас от всего окружаю…

🔥38❤24❤‍🔥8🥰5

2 Nov 2026, 04:40 UTC≈2,240 views139 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ День, когда лучший способ что-то решить - ничего не решать. Если тормозит - значит, так надо. Если непонятно - посиди в этом. Сейчас не время для активных действий. Самое полезное, что можно сделать - посмотреть на ситуацию под другим углом. То, что кажется тупиком, на самом деле просто пауза. И да, иногда, чтобы что-то пришло, нужно сначала отпустить. 🤩Вопрос дня 🤩 Что бы вы хотели, чтобы случилось п…

❤101❤‍🔥25🔥11🥰2

1 Nov 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,520 views140 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ Сегодняшний день обещает быть спокойным и приятным. Появляется ощущение опоры и стабильности - как будто всё наконец встало на свои места. Может прийти хорошая новость, удачно завершиться какое-то дело или просто наступит внутреннее спокойствие. Возможно, захочется собрать близких, отметить что-то или просто порадоваться тому, что есть. Сегодня не нужно искать проблемы на пустом месте и накручивать себ…

❤‍🔥70❤52🔥12🥰6

31 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈2,450 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Кстати, кто смотрел реванш сегодня? За кого голосуете? И почему?

❤70❤‍🔥15🥰6

31 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,940 views85 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

САМЫЙ ОПАСНЫЙ КОСТЮМ НА ХЭЛЛОУИН 👻 На Руси существовал образ, который было страшно не только увидеть, но и примерить на себя. Назывался он умрун - и это был настоящий костюм покойника. Ряженого облачали в белую ткань, лицо покрывали мукой или прятали под тонкой материей. Для большей убедительности делали страшные зубы из картофеля или репы. Иногда умрун передвигался на ходулях, а иногда его изображали лежащим на ск…

❤44❤‍🔥25👍9🔥7

31 Oct 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,720 views127 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️ Сегодня день, когда можно ничего не планировать. Главное - сделать первый шаг, даже если не знаешь, куда он приведёт. Не бойтесь выглядеть глупо или наивно. Иногда лучший план - это его отсутствие. Разрешите себе быть спонтанными. Сказать «да» туда, куда обычно отказалась бы. Пойти гулять без маршрута. Начать что-то новое без гарантий. 🤩Вопрос дня 🤩 Что вы давно хотели попробовать, но не решались? 🌟🌟

❤94❤‍🔥17🔥15🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 254 posts we hold for @PEVCHAYAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @PEVCHAYAi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
27 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Poll183 voters

Хотите браслеты из натурального камня в наличие? Или оставлять только ожерелья?

  1. За браслеты80%
  2. Хватит ожерелий8%
  3. Хочу еще свечей!37%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 254 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Александр Саков | Officially
@alexandr_sakov · 18,656
#1
ОЛЕГ ШЕПС || ЕДИНСТВЕННЫЙ НАСТОЯЩИЙ
@olegshepsoriginal · 121,328
#2
В комнате с сильнейшими🪄
@diegSheeev · 1,654
#3
𝑩𝒚𝒕𝒗𝒂𝒂𝒆♡
@bytvaae · 1,540
#4
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,116
#5
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,760
#6
DARSI 🪄🧚‍♀️
@dsimakowa · 10,406
#7
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,392,471
#8
Саманта Адам
@samanta_adam · 10,867
#9
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,492
#10
Elena Cherevata
@elenacherevata · 33,448
#11
ARTYOM CHERNYSHOV
@artyemofficial · 1,882
#12
Илья Ларионов
@larionovshow · 15,861
#13
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,106,024
#14
Битва экстрасенсов - Дилаурентис
@dilawrentisss · 44,324
#15
secret garden 2
@mantra366oi · 2,589
#16
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,779
#17
Женевьева Шулик ⛦
@black13_moon · 2,286
#18
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 843,809
#19
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 732,691
#20
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 606,183
#21
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,385
#22
vrlona
@vrrlona · 1,281
#23
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,594
#24
Разумный Спойлер
@razuummm · 1,474
#25
Экстра Битва🔮
@extrabitva_official · 6,472
#26
битва колдунов - ЭКСТРАСЕНСЫ РЕВАНШ 3.🪐
@bitvakoldynov668 · 17,484
#27
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,917
#28
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 731,088
#29
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,917
#30
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 179,258
#31
Exile
@exilemusic13 · 1,439,594
#32
Маша и Роберт (Герберы)
@thegerberslive · 623,439
#33
ПАРАДЕЕВИЧ
@paradeevich · 1,045,706
#34
матвиксф💋💋
@matvxf_j · 1,359
#35
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,884
#36
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,094,121
#37
KOSTI
@kosti · 552,170
#38
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,693,345
#39
нᴀᴩᴇɜᴏᴋ ᴏᴛ 𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨♡
@narezokotsherro · 1,451
#40
🫂𝐞𝐥𝐤𝐬𝐬_𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐩𝐬𝐬🫂
@elkkinnss · 514 (as read 4 September 2026)
#41
bitva.sluhi 🪬| Битва экстрасенсов| Битва Сильнейших | Битва Слухи
@bitvasluhi · 1,173
#42
КК
@petrovtel · 542,485
#43
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 230,262
#44
𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘃𝗲𝗲𝘃𝘅𝘃𝗶𝗯𝗲
@matveevxvibe · 1,985
#45
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 234,326
#46
Битва экстрасенсов.FAN
@bitvapsychics24 · 416
#47
Вилка / KITANA
@violetta_kitana23 · 112,580
#48
Андрей Кокошка
@mister_kokoshka2 · 454,903
#49
ИРИНА ИГНАТЕНКО
@irinaaaign · 3,170
#50
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 143,573
#51
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,742
#52
tenderlybae💔
@plsbetenderly · 218,771
#53
ХАЗЯЕВА В МОМЕНТЕ
@xazayeva · 372,821
#54
цыганский табор
@bitvacigan · 5,581
#55
𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢
@bestremi · 1,392
#56
подвал олега
@podval565 · 19,002
#57
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,765
#58
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 296,159
#59

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Череватый Влад || Official
@CherevatyiVlad · 239,742
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,917
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 September 2026
Elena Cherevata
@elenacherevata · 33,448
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 3 September 2026
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,116
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 September 2026
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,884
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,594
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 September 2026
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,742
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 August 2026
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,760
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
Виктория Райдос
@viktoriaraidosru · 48,006
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
Соня Егорова
@egorovasonya · 22,080
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 September 2026
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,492
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
Надежда Шевченко
@mnogolikmagic · 28,571
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,779
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
Битва экстрасенсов - Дилаурентис
@dilawrentisss · 44,324
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 28 August 2026
подвал олега
@podval565 · 19,002
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 October 2026
xolidayboy
@xoxoliday · 56,874
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Шоу Воли
@volyashow · 54,939
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 296,159
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
Akmal’
@akmaltgshkaaaa · 77,549
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Женя Искандарова
@jena_isk · 27,258
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PEVCHAYA” (@PEVCHAYAi), 28,152 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PEVCHAYAi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.