Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭЛИНА УРТАЕВА

Channel

ЭЛИНА УРТАЕВА

@elina_urtaeva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

383subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435336307
TypeChannel
Username@elina_urtaeva
Created27 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elina_urtaeva

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

375384379.521 August 2026 — 375 subscribers21 August 2026 — 375 subscribers29 August 2026 — 376 subscribers7 September 2026 — 384 subscribers15 September 2026 — 383 subscribers38321 August 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 374–385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:15383-1
7 Sept 2026, 03:18384+8
29 Aug 2026, 10:27376+1
21 Aug 2026, 10:46375no change
21 Aug 2026, 03:45375first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1593.8%
🔥16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC70 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Путин отказался от встречи с Кани и Мосбиржа полетелааааа….🫠🫠🫠

20 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC78 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

А тем временем в Москве с бензином полный провал🫠🫠🫠 дикие пробки

18 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Всем физкульт)🚀 Если хотите классный пилатес, очень рекомендую студию Flex&Form на Брюсов переулоке)

3

17 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Кани не выдержал и решил , что «Седую ночь» надо все-таки исполнить в Санкт-Петербурге) Ждем🚀🚀🚀

4

9 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC122 views5 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Все физкульт!!! Бодрящее утро было в лужниках)🤪

5

2 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC153 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Что происходит в футбольном мире?

1 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC133 viewsread 21 August 2026

ужассссс. нет слов https://t.me/bbbreaking/234791

29 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC≈96,200 viewsread 21 August 2026

Новость за день поменялась. оооо как… https://t.me/bankrollo/64138

27 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC145 viewsread 21 August 2026
Photo

ЕС вывел из-под санкций российский соболиный мех Вывода соболиного меха из-под санкций добивались Италия и Греция. Эти две страны являются основными покупателями российских соболиных шкур в ЕС. Еврокомиссия пояснила, что исключение необходимо, поскольку Россия «доминирует в мировой торговле соболями, оставляя европейским производителям мало альтернативных поставщиков». Теперь только пушистые соболи без санкций)🫠

20 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC136 views4 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Чем запомнился Чемпионат мира по футболу!!! Самое интересное

3🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @elina_urtaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Agineer Ai News
@agineer_ai · 72,042
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭЛИНА УРТАЕВА” (@elina_urtaeva), 383 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elina_urtaeva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.