⭐ Антропология международных отношений, постамериканский мир, внутренняя политика и глобальная стратегия США⭐
Автор: Максим Сучков - международник, американист, директор @imi_mgimo
Заявление в РКН №8062440847
https://t.me/boost/postamerica
Created
15 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 92 days, net +229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,184–10,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 08:05
10,468
+8
5 Nov 2026, 07:07
10,460
+9
3 Nov 2026, 08:56
10,451
+3
2 Nov 2026, 09:26
10,448
-2
1 Nov 2026, 08:19
10,450
+7
31 Oct 2026, 05:28
10,443
+8
30 Oct 2026, 06:56
10,435
+4
29 Oct 2026, 08:46
10,431
-3
28 Oct 2026, 07:09
10,434
+5
27 Oct 2026, 04:01
10,429
+1
26 Oct 2026, 04:50
10,428
-3
25 Oct 2026, 05:58
10,431
-1
24 Oct 2026, 08:26
10,432
+1
23 Oct 2026, 10:08
10,431
-3
22 Oct 2026, 10:50
10,434
-3
21 Oct 2026, 07:38
10,437
-2
20 Oct 2026, 06:10
10,439
-3
19 Oct 2026, 07:09
10,442
-4
18 Oct 2026, 08:46
10,446
+3
17 Oct 2026, 06:28
10,443
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.1%
avg views ÷ 10,468 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,180
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.847%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
34 (16 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
49,460
Reactions total
419
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
668
Videos
27
Links
680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,005 reactions across 34 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
713
35.6%
🔥
548
27.3%
👍
343
17.1%
💯
79
3.94%
👏
76
3.79%
🤔
73
3.64%
❤🔥
61
3.04%
👎
54
2.69%
🤨
13
0.648%
🤬
13
0.648%
🙈
8
0.399%
🗿
7
0.349%
🤩
5
0.249%
🎉
4
0.2%
😢
3
0.15%
🤯
2
0.1%
🏆
1
0.05%
😎
1
0.05%
😱
1
0.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,005 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Несколько визуализаций о специфике прошедших в США выборов и показавшиеся мне интересными комментариев и наблюдений некоторых коллег:
⭐️ О том, почему главным архитектором победы демократов стал сам Дональд Трамп:
https://t.me/cityuponthehill/460
https://t.me/MinchenkoTrump/1511
⭐️ О том, почему рядовому американскому труженику от этой победы демократов по итогу лучше жить не станет:
https://t.me/valentinbogdanov/…
Что означает поражение республиканцев на промежуточных выборах в Конгресс?
Итог "мидтермов" на табло: республиканцы деклассированы, демократы ликуют.
Справедливости ради, никто не ждал, что республиканцы выступят хорошо. Интрига сводилась к тому, сколько именно мест "слоны" уступят "ослам" в Палате представителей, удержат ли большинство в Сенате и сохранят ли преимущество по губернаторскому корпусу. Везде получилос…
Разведка и борьба с терроризмом в эпоху ИИ или почему кадры [по-прежнему] решают все?
Терроризм и разведка - две темы, традиционно вызывающие интерес органов госбезопасности широкой публики.
В новом выпуске подкаста @imi_mgimo «Внешняя политика» поговорили с экспертом в обеих этих областях Григорием Зерщиковым (из недружественной Голландии). Не Америкой единой же. Хотя и тут снова без нее не обошлось.
Выяснили:
⭐️…
Почему в США на самом высоком уровне заговорили о "цивилизационном подходе"?
Конец недели - лучшее время для размышлений о великом - о цивилизациях. Ведь выборы пройдут, а намерение США менять мир под себя останется.:
⭐️Почему вдруг высшее руководство США заговорило о международных отношениях (и собственном месте в них) с позиций цивилизационного подхода? Три года назад , когда это сделала Россия (в своей концепции…
Трамп уступит демократам Конгресс: нам-то что?
В преддверии промежуточных выборов в США много стенаний о том, что республиканцы потеряют одну, а то и обе палаты Конгресса.
Поразмышлял на страницах @kommersant чего и кому в действительности стоит опасаться при таком исходе.
В сухом остатке:
..большой катастрофы в случае поражения на выборах, как некоторые ожидают, с республиканцами, скорее всего, не случится.
Даж…
Американские "миры", "Большой Запад" и пагубное влияние Британии на американскую стратегию: обстоятельный разговор о политике США
Центр Стимсона - возможно,
самый яркий сейчас представитель части экспертной среды в Вашингтоне, именующей себя сторонниками сдержанного курса ("restrainers"). На небосклоне американских мозготанков они появились давно, в 1989 году, но прямо сейчас там сошлись воедино три компонента, не…
Как писать "политические" тексты?
У коллег @russiancouncil вышел подкаст, где дорогие друзья Юлия Мельникова и @revelation_3_16 обсуждают по-настоящему важный вопрос: как создавать тексты по международной политической тематике.
Полезно послушать тем, кто уже работает в этой сфере, или только планирует связать с нею свое профессиональное будущее. Будем честны: ничего, кроме говорения и писания, гуманитарии не умеют…
Сегодня свой день рождения отмечают коллеги из @CCEIShse!
Вот уже два десятилетия они оказывают заметное влияние на исследовательскую повестку нашего небольшого профессионального сообщества и на мышление лиц, принимающих решения.
Сегодня ведущие сотрудники ЦКЕМИ - это интеллектуальный драйвер @svop_ru и @valdaiclub, интересные авторы @ru_global и
@profilejournal, преподаватели @hse_official, профессионалы, за разви…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @postamerica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Россия в глобальной политике @ru_global · 54,959 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Алексей Наумов. Внешпол @vneshpol · 21,205 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Глебсмит @glebsmith77 · 28,320 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
One Big Union @one_big_union · 19,997 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
Ватфор | Автострадный think tank @vatfor · 31,873 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
Китай. 80-е и не только @china80s · 19,736 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пост-Америка️” (@postamerica), 10,468 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postamerica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.