Новая большая статья члена президиума Совета Андрея Ильницкого. https://www.business-gazeta.ru/amp/715167

Channel
Совет по внешней и оборонной политике
@svop_ru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,712subscribers
+70 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001121740069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svop_ru |
| Description | Создан в 1992 г. Задача организации: содействие выработке и реализации стратегических концепций развития России, ее внешней и оборонной политики. Комментарии членов СВОП. Сайт: https://svop.ru/ |
| Created | 17 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svop_ru |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:20 | 6,712 | +9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 6,703 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 6,700 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 6,704 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 6,701 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 6,696 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 6,702 | -1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 6,703 | +16 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 6,687 | +8 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 6,679 | +7 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 6,672 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 6,667 | +12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 6,655 | +21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 6,634 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 6,631 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 6,632 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 6,631 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 6,639 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 6,641 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 6,644 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.69%
- avg views ÷ 6,712 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 315
- 35 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 35
- of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,025 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,430
- Videos
- ≈97
- Links
- ≈4,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 18s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (2.86%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Член Совета Георгий Бовт об итогах и последствиях промежуточных выборов в Конгресс США для Трампа и его сторонников https://www.bfm.ru/news/622811
Председатель Президиума СВОП Фёдор Лукьянов о внутренних обстоятельствах трансформаций в США и их влиянии на мировое устройство и жизнь отдельных стран и народов https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/vybor-lukyanov/
Член СВОП Дмитрий Суслов с предположениями, чем обернется для Трампа поражение на выборах в Конгресс https://expert.ru/mnenie/chem-obernetsya-dlya-trampa-porazhenie-na-vyborakh-v-kongress
Член Совета Андрей Кортунов об атмосфере выборов в Вашингтоне и последствиях их итогов для Трампа https://iz.ru/2196514/andrei-kortunov/stolitca-protiv-prezidenta
Член СВОП Максим Сучков размышляет о том, что означает поражение республиканцев на промежуточных выборах в Конгресс https://profile.ru/columnist/izbienie-slonov-1920150/
Член Совета Сергей Лавров на пленарном заседании высокого уровня четвёртой Минской международной конференции по евразийской безопасности: Инициатива создания архитектуры евразийской безопасности призвана содействовать поиску решений сохраняющихся проблем и стабилизировать военно-политическую обстановку в интересах всех государств и всех объединений нашего континента https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/2159555/
Почетный председатель Президиума СВОП Сергей Караганов: Мы должны понять наконец, кто мы есть, какими нам хочется быть. Мы – не восточноевропейская окраина, а великая самостоятельная евразийская держава https://profile.ru/politics/sergej-karaganov-my-severnaya-civilizaciya-a-sibir-nashe-budushhee-1919277/
Член СВОП Андрей Шитов о противоречиях в итогах промежуточных выборов и неопределённости дальнейшего политического курса США https://dzen.ru/a/ausT6nzGLW7qLYI4
Член Совета Иван Тимофеев выступил с лекцией об особенностях российского цивилизационного подхода https://vkvideo.ru/video-46560358_456239413
Член СВОП Алексей Куприянов о том, как сугубо исторический спор [об исторической родине ариев] стал в Индии политическим https://profile.ru/abroad/arijskie-stradaniya-kak-sugubo-istoricheskij-spor-stal-v-indii-politicheskim-1919669/
3 ноября состоялся Лекторий СВОП на тему: «Мир на троих… Есть ли о чём поговорить главам России, США и Китая?». 👆О Лектории делится впечатлениями Андрей Александрович Исэров, заместитель декана факультета мировой экономики и мировой политики НИУ «Высшая школа экономики».
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @svop_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@ru_global · 54,9594 posts«Международные отношения: европейские и азиатские исследования» НИУ ВШЭ
@hse_ir_european_asian_studies · 2152 postsТемы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 76,7701 post"Середина земли"
@mediaterra · 91 postОВЧИНСКИЙ
@ovchinsky · 4331 postСергей Изотов
@postizotov · 3,4671 postAST
@titoval · 11 postТруба от качелей
@trubaotkacheley · 2,6081 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kramnikcat · 38,9685 postsПолитбюро 2.0
@politburo2 · 39,8794 postsЕвгений Минченко. Персонально по делу
@enminchenko · 23,4613 postsThinkTank | Центр исследований
@ThinkTankCenter · 2233 postsКитай. 80-е и не только
@china80s · 19,7362 postsЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,3342 postsЛИАД ИМИ МГИМО
@liad_mgimo · 3232 postsМинченко. World
@mcrepostworld · 6,6592 postsВалентин Богданов
@valentinbogdanov · 40,8332 postsВ Дубае всё спокойно
@arab_countries · 1,9091 postФакультет МО | МГИМО
@facultetMO · 7,9101 postХугаев о политике и технологиях
@HugaevZ · 6271 postIG Energy
@IGenergy · 12,7261 postМеждународники
@mezhdunarodniki · 9951 postИранизатор
@middleastguide · 1,6571 postNazar Outlook
@nazarlook · 2071 postПолитика с нуля
@politics_from_zero · 2091 postReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,013,6431 postРоссия в глобальной политике
@ru_global · 54,9591 postruspromo
@ruspromo · 791 postScience Diplomacy Club MEPhI
@sdclub_mephi · 2311 postСтояние на Рублёвке
@TheStandOnRublevka · 2631 postСАМОВЕРСИТЕТ
@universelfity · 3,8581 postМышьяк И Старые Кружева
@vmitskev · 2,3271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@mcrepostworld · 6,6593 postsПост-Америка️
@postamerica · 10,4682 postsАндрей Сушенцов о международном положении
@asushentsov · 5,4271 postTBordachev
@Bord73 · 2,5051 postEvening Prophet
@eveningprophet · 19,0831 postФакультет МО | МГИМО
@facultetMO · 7,9101 postМинэнерго России
@minenergo_official · 16,7331 postРБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 914,5361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ru_global · 54,959
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
@china80s · 19,736
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 September 2026
@vatfor · 31,994
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Совет по внешней и оборонной политике” (@svop_ru), 6,712 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svop_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.