Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ELIT PAPKE WORLDWIDE

Channel

ELIT PAPKE WORLDWIDE

@elitpapkee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,896subscribers

+407 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534359212
TypeChannel
Username@elitpapkee
DescriptionELIT PAPKE Культовое сообщество ВК из самого сердца десятых. Наши проекты @UzbekTechnologyVPNbot KYR/DAG TECH Маркетплейсы ozon.ru/seller/kyrgyz-tehnolodzhi Cотрудничество - В.П., рекл, предложка @PoLQvin VK.COM/ELITPAPKE Est. in 2016. Russia
Created7 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/elitpapkee

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,46614,99614,7316 August 2026 — 14,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,487 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,484 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,483 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,487 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,486 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,491 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,496 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,492 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,502 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,505 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,495 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,488 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,489 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,482 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,487 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,466 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,468 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,473 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,486 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,483 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,510 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,529 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,547 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,544 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,551 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,563 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,609 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,629 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,698 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,730 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,775 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,794 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,881 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,976 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,996 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,990 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,983 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,979 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,984 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,979 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,978 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,975 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,969 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,962 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,959 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,958 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,896 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,890 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,887 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,878 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,870 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,882 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,903 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,900 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,895 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,896 subscribers14,8966 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net +407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,387–15,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 04:0614,896+1
5 Nov 2026, 03:5114,895-5
4 Nov 2026, 03:5814,900-3
3 Nov 2026, 00:3614,903+21
31 Oct 2026, 01:1714,882+12
29 Oct 2026, 23:1514,870-8
29 Oct 2026, 00:3114,878-9
27 Oct 2026, 22:4614,887-3
26 Oct 2026, 21:0614,890-6
25 Oct 2026, 22:3014,896-62
23 Oct 2026, 20:0614,958-1
22 Oct 2026, 21:0614,959-3
21 Oct 2026, 14:3614,962-7
20 Oct 2026, 14:0814,969-6
19 Oct 2026, 16:1714,975-3
18 Oct 2026, 14:4614,978-1
17 Oct 2026, 14:4014,979-5
16 Oct 2026, 13:4814,984+5
15 Oct 2026, 11:5014,979-4
14 Oct 2026, 15:1914,983first reading

Engagement

138 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 14,896 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 138 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held138 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total117,750
Reactions total2,209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,600
Videos
≈2,950
Links
≈3,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 47s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,579 reactions across 131 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,25819.5%
custom 52786893800247307932,15218.6%
❤1,69414.6%
😁1,0859.37%
💯6725.80%
🔥4974.29%
👍4613.98%
🤪4223.64%
😢4053.50%
🥰2852.46%
❤‍🔥2672.31%
🙏1761.52%
⚡1701.47%
😍1601.38%
😱1481.28%
😈1271.10%
💋1080.933%
🗿960.829%
😎830.717%
🤓640.553%
14 further kinds2492.15%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 131 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elitpapkee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (21.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,420 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

elit papke. subscribe

custom 527868938002473079339😁16😢4❤2

6 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,960 views68 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

ELIT PAPKE. KON4ATb

🥰40custom 527868938002473079315😁8🗿4❤1

5 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTCviews —

ELIT PAPKE WORLDWIDE pinned «Какие приколы хотели бы видеть в нашем магазе на озон? ССЫЛКА НА НАШ АКТУАЛЬНЫЙ МАГАЗ, ОСТАВЛЯЙТЕ ОТЗЫВЫ, БУДЕМ ОТВЕЧАТЬ НА ВСЁ https://www.ozon.ru/seller/kyrgyz-tehnolodzhi»

5 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC≈2,290 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣19🙏4❤2🍓1

5 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC≈2,320 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣30👻5🙏3❤1

5 Nov 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,300 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤17custom 527868938002473079317🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC≈2,270 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Какие приколы хотели бы видеть в нашем магазе на озон? ССЫЛКА НА НАШ АКТУАЛЬНЫЙ МАГАЗ, ОСТАВЛЯЙТЕ ОТЗЫВЫ, БУДЕМ ОТВЕЧАТЬ НА ВСЁ https://www.ozon.ru/seller/kyrgyz-tehnolodzhi

custom 527868938002473079313

5 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,390 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

АСЗАХАХАХахахсукаа, гемини ай ай самое лучшее что есть из нейронок Так же пополнили запасы обложек. Готовим еще новые приколы в стиле Элит папке. Будут хохмовые резиновые брелки и новые значки. Ну и через месяц пополним запасы ковриков https://www.ozon.ru/seller/kyrgyz-tehnolodzhi

😁35👍3⚡2

5 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈2,390 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

@UzbekTechnologyVPNbot

🤣33custom 52786893800247307938❤3👍1🙏1

5 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC≈2,960 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

висянга. матанга

😁43❤5🌚1👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @elitpapkee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @elitpapkee as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
37 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Подсосов Мэда Тред
@podsos_club · 35,630
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
CatNews
@cat0news · 19,478
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 October 2026
Тарковское Метадвижение
@metadvij · 41,748
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
Андерграунд - развлекательный телеграм канал
@underground_youtube · 21,963
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
WebM⚡️2.0
@webmland · 37,208
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Абу
@abuwtf · 275,416
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Д///ИХАД
@tvjihad · 123,213
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ELIT PAPKE WORLDWIDE” (@elitpapkee), 14,896 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elitpapkee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.