Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Save pic

Channel

Save pic

@s4vepic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,112subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240006394
TypeChannel
Username@s4vepic
Created18 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/s4vepic

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,10618,15118,128.56 August 2026 — 18,151 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,148 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,138 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,130 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,126 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,122 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,119 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,118 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,120 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,112 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,106 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,121 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,118 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,127 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,123 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,136 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,142 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,140 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,135 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,142 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,144 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,136 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,139 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,129 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,131 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,133 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,137 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,138 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,141 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,117 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,131 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,139 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,146 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,141 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,142 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,137 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,133 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,131 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,128 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,130 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,126 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,120 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,116 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,118 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,120 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,112 subscribers18,1126 August 202627 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 82 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,099–18,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 01:5618,112-8
26 Oct 2026, 02:2818,120+2
25 Oct 2026, 01:5518,118+2
24 Oct 2026, 01:4018,116-4
23 Oct 2026, 04:5618,120-6
22 Oct 2026, 07:5818,126-4
20 Oct 2026, 22:3618,130+2
19 Oct 2026, 21:5518,128-3
18 Oct 2026, 19:3018,131-2
17 Oct 2026, 22:2718,133-4
17 Oct 2026, 00:1518,137-5
15 Oct 2026, 20:4018,142+1
14 Oct 2026, 22:1918,141-5
13 Oct 2026, 13:4418,146+7
9 Oct 2026, 11:1518,139+8
5 Oct 2026, 03:3618,131+14
28 Sept 2026, 07:0018,117-24
17 Sept 2026, 20:5518,141+3
15 Sept 2026, 19:0218,138+1
14 Sept 2026, 04:1718,137first reading

Engagement

685 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 685 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 44s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,447 reactions across 642 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,38034.8%
custom 54673898075565790051,55810.1%
🔥1,0806.99%
❤‍🔥8945.79%
😭8885.75%
custom 54589242380375905156854.43%
😁5053.27%
custom 54317544767865678344442.87%
🆒3892.52%
🌚3452.23%
custom 52582162802420336683402.20%
custom 53482618157908698893202.07%
⚡3192.07%
👍2651.72%
🎉2641.71%
💯2561.66%
💅1701.10%
🥰1621.05%
💋1370.887%
🐳1350.874%
20 further kinds9115.90%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 660 of the 685 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,837 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 685 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 685 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s4vepic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 685 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.04%
14 of 685 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
14
posts carrying an erid · 14 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
963
over 14 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,290
over 671 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFFxkYbB119 August 202619 August 2026
2W5zFFy4gbT120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFG3NaxZ120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFG9MEAd127 August 202627 August 2026
2W5zFGaEYmw11 September 20261 September 2026
2W5zFGdMFQM121 August 202621 August 2026
2W5zFGmBNQh121 August 202621 August 2026
2W5zFH1iTNq125 August 202625 August 2026
2W5zFHKQbiy129 August 202629 August 2026
2W5zFHT7fPX124 August 202624 August 2026
2W5zFJ1A8zM123 August 202623 August 2026
2W5zFJ7SF61126 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 2 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 685 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC516 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤17custom 54589242380375905158

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC808 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥18

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 06:14 UTC979 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥17🎉3🤩3

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC≈1,100 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥20🫡8custom 54317544767865678342😭1

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 04:08 UTC≈1,190 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🆒15🎉10custom 54317544767865678345

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 03:08 UTC≈1,250 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😎16❤2

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,290 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 543175447678656783429💯7❤1custom 54589242380375905151

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 01:06 UTC≈1,320 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭21❤3😈3

Signed Eugene

3 Sept 2026, 00:06 UTC≈1,390 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤29🎅1

Signed Eugene

2 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC≈1,400 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🕊23❤5🔥2

Signed Eugene

2 Sept 2026, 22:45 UTC≈1,380 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤25

Signed Eugene

Showing the 12 most recent of 685 posts we hold for @s4vepic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ultimate rand/shit
@UltRandShitt · 22,682
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 September 2026
DANKEST
@ORGINALDANKEZT1 · 35,357
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Save pic” (@s4vepic), 18,112 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s4vepic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.