Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DANKEST

Channel

DANKEST

@ORGINALDANKEZT1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,253subscribers

-863 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001741006424
TypeChannel
Username@ORGINALDANKEZT1
DescriptionРКН - https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6736c542ac39970d5f6e96cc Твой любимый https://t.me/MishaChaykaadmin - админ https://t.me/Lornetys - за разбаном сюда
Created24 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ORGINALDANKEZT1

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

35,25336,11635,684.56 August 20267 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -863. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,124–36,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 23:4835,253-4
6 Nov 2026, 23:2035,257-12
5 Nov 2026, 23:5635,269-16
5 Nov 2026, 01:4935,285-11
4 Nov 2026, 01:3935,296-9
3 Nov 2026, 01:1935,305-6
1 Nov 2026, 23:0835,311-6
1 Nov 2026, 01:5635,317-9
31 Oct 2026, 04:3935,326-6
30 Oct 2026, 04:3035,332-5
29 Oct 2026, 04:5735,337-10
28 Oct 2026, 03:5835,347-10
27 Oct 2026, 00:5635,357-10
25 Oct 2026, 23:1635,367-14
24 Oct 2026, 20:1735,381-19
23 Oct 2026, 19:4535,400-5
22 Oct 2026, 21:1835,405-9
21 Oct 2026, 17:4635,414-12
20 Oct 2026, 10:2035,426-13
19 Oct 2026, 08:4635,439first reading

Engagement

1,316 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 35,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,820
457 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
457
of 1,316 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held1,316 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total2,203,020
Reactions total84,026
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈31,900
Videos
≈35,400
Links
≈1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 25m
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 750 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

178,987 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546998050605972138546,43825.9%
❤33,04318.5%
🤣29,42116.4%
😁18,70310.4%
custom 546738980755657900516,3989.16%
custom 546962932376379667015,9478.91%
😭9,6025.36%
😢6,3213.53%
👍2,2641.26%
😘8500.475%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178,987 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 457 posts held from the last 30 days (2.84%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,090 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

В Японии коты «обвиняют» хозяев в землетрясениях После сильных землетрясений в японском Твиттере и TikTok появляется волна роликов с котами в «режиме прокурора». Питомцы забираются повыше, нахохливаются и смотрят на хозяина с таким укором, будто это он устроил тряску. В народе это уже называют «теорией вины хозяина» (飼い主責任論) — якобы коты считают, что землетрясение случилось из-за того, что хозяин вовремя не насыпал …

custom 546998050605972138564😁17❤5

8 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC≈2,910 views116 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Сибиряки курили траву ещё 2800 лет назад В Туве, на юге Сибири, учёные исследовали огромный скифский курган Туннуг-1, датируемый VIII веком до нашей эры. Внутри обнаружили более 1400 семян конопли. А в образцах волос захороненных людей нашли следы каннабинола — продукта распада ТГК, главного психоактивного вещества конопли. Это самое древнее прямое свидетельство употребления каннабиса ради опьяняющего эффекта. Учён…

custom 546962932376379667081custom 546738980755657900528❤7

8 Nov 2026, 14:08 UTC≈3,060 views114 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ястреб, ставший вирусным из-за того, что располнел до такой степени, что не мог летать, после того как съел слишком много кур, снова летает после потери веса Краснолопастный ястреб сбросил около 130 граммов всего за полтора месяца благодаря диете и упражнениям, но всё ещё слишком тучен, чтобы его выпустили в дикую природу

custom 546998050605972138581🤣20❤13

8 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC≈3,640 views151 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Официальный аккаунт ВМС США выложил это для вербовки людей 🙄

custom 546962932376379667095🤣47❤7😁2

8 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈3,980 views256 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Чемпион F1 Ландо Норрис прикрывает глаза рукой от дождя... вот бы существовал какой-нибудь вид одежды, который можно надеть на голову для такого случая 🙄

custom 5469629323763796670171🤣64❤16😁5

8 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC≈3,720 views148 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Ммм бананья Из-за того что чёрный, один всё же украл в конце 😳

custom 5469980506059721385117❤22🤣9

8 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC≈4,060 views162 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

И не надо было бы тогда карликов в жерло вулкана кидать

❤79😁52🤣31

8 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈3,860 views139 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Столько блеска и надежды было в его глазах…🥺

😁89🤣34custom 54696293237637966707❤4😢2😭2custom 54673898075565790051

8 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC≈4,040 views216 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Когда я вижу, что женщина делает руки вот так, я знаю, что сейчас увижу и услышу самый тупой ебанистический бред в своей жизни 🙄

😁122🤣68custom 546962932376379667016❤8custom 54673898075565790052

8 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC≈4,110 views158 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Шанс, что книга будет вас сексуально домогаться, очень низок, но никогда не равен нулю 🙂 Страница с посвящением из книги Destruction's Desire Мелоди Джоанн: "Посвящается всем любителям мрачного романтического фэнтези. Это мы теперь вместо терапии читаем? Прекрасно. Тогда "раздвигайте" пошире страницы этой книги и переворачивайте страницу" "Вот так, моя хорошая, грязная книжная шлюшка"

custom 5469629323763796670115🤣39❤4

8 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈4,340 views166 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Когда кто-то хочет со мной взаимодействовать, а я с утра ещё ничего не ел😡

❤95custom 546998050605972138567🤣4

8 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC≈4,650 views187 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Никто: Тип который купил себе недавно аэрогриль:

custom 5467389807556579005150❤23😁12custom 54696293237637966702

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,316 posts we hold for @ORGINALDANKEZT1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ORGINALDANKEZT1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
18 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

DANKEST LITE ☭
@DANKESTLITE · 7,054
#1
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,677
#2
КБ
@cbpub · 667,968
#3
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,603
#4
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 211,281
#5
Абу
@abuwtf · 275,000
#6
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,119,575
#7
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 322,611
#8
МемБлог 🫪
@memeblogteam · 26,150
#9
4ch
@why4ch · 1,022,264
#10
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,528,817
#11
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,024,915
#12
Rozetked
@rozetked · 648,103
#13
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,541,494
#14
НМШ
@nmshhub · 670,931
#15
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,781
#16
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 967,574
#17
MDK
@mudak · 524,500
#18
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 205,848
#19
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,757
#20
ZED
@ZEDTimeToWakeUp · 20,101
#21
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,113,582
#22
Лепра
@Lepragram · 340,868
#23
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 267,921
#24
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 710,783
#25
DailyBlog
@thedailyblogteam · 33,241
#26
Mash
@mash · 3,142,084
#27
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,837
#28
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 183,086
#29
КБ. Игры
@cb_games · 382,046
#30
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 365,150
#31
WebM⚡️2.0
@webmland · 37,187
#32
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 114,696
#33
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,671
#34
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,013,503
#35
ВНБ/Вселенная Неполживых баек☭
@vnbsource · 4,536
#36
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 322,903
#37
ТОПОР - Горячие новости
@topor · 1,291,772
#38
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,779
#39
Зио
@zio402 · 43,553
#40
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,886,664
#41
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 478,412
#42
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 357,421
#43
NN
@naebnet · 2,178,437
#44
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 923,335
#45
Карельский бальзам | Новости
@KB_Announcments · 47,363
#46
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 490,491
#47
Мятежник Джек
@rebel_jack_review · 21,357
#48
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,266,111
#49
nerds
@nerds · 411,141
#50
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 658,722
#51
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 487,840
#52
Деградат нация
@degradat1 · 13,448
#53
MovieBlog 🎥
@themovieblogteam · 33,870
#54
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,139
#55
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 429,401
#56
Белорусский силовик
@belarusian_silovik · 450,006
#57
Каргач 🇷🇺⚡️Ꙃ
@karga4 · 22,216
#58
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,800,644
#59
IXBT Games | Короче
@ixbtgames · 68,089
#60
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 905,820
#61
Журнал ЖОЖ
@journal_joj · 9,232
#62
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 276,046
#63
ProstMem 💢
@prostmem_sb · 12,566
#64
.джастпик 🍁
@justp1c_tg · 12,144
#65
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,689,376
#66
Save pic
@s4vepic · 18,113
#67
Каргас
@kargacc · 97,558
#68
Лентач
@oldlentach · 262,628
#69
AnimeBlog
@animeblogteam · 7,954
#70
Мои любимые юморески
@myfavoritejumoreski · 79,330
#71
WebM⚡️Original
@webmOriginal · 16,132
#72
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,606
#73
RuGG. Скандалы, игры, повесточка
@ggscg_tg · 13,629
#74
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 751,300
#75
hypewave
@hypewave · 55,404
#77
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,945
#78
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 525,601
#79

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МемБлог 🫪
@memeblogteam · 26,150
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
a.WebM
@awebm · 20,276
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 28 September 2026
DailyBlog
@thedailyblogteam · 33,241
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Мятежник Джек
@rebel_jack_review · 21,357
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Тарковское Метадвижение
@metadvij · 41,811
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
WebM⚡️2.0
@webmland · 37,187
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DANKEST” (@ORGINALDANKEZT1), 35,253 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ORGINALDANKEZT1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.