Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 45 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,500–17,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:16
17,525
-8
17 Sept 2026, 05:42
17,533
+2
15 Sept 2026, 07:39
17,531
-5
13 Sept 2026, 19:56
17,536
-9
12 Sept 2026, 04:16
17,545
-6
9 Sept 2026, 20:38
17,551
-7
6 Sept 2026, 10:36
17,558
-7
4 Sept 2026, 01:38
17,565
+4
2 Sept 2026, 15:43
17,561
+3
1 Sept 2026, 14:54
17,558
+6
31 Aug 2026, 16:25
17,552
-7
30 Aug 2026, 14:04
17,559
-4
29 Aug 2026, 12:16
17,563
-9
28 Aug 2026, 14:34
17,572
-3
27 Aug 2026, 13:14
17,575
-4
26 Aug 2026, 13:04
17,579
-2
25 Aug 2026, 16:23
17,581
-4
24 Aug 2026, 19:39
17,585
-7
23 Aug 2026, 04:22
17,592
-12
21 Aug 2026, 13:58
17,604
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
51.2%
avg views ÷ 17,525 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,980
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
35 (15 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
62,840
Reactions total
1,130
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,446 reactions across 34 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,030
45.7%
👎
645
14.5%
🤣
612
13.8%
😢
357
8.03%
❤
332
7.47%
🔥
266
5.98%
😁
108
2.43%
💔
49
1.10%
🤬
16
0.36%
🤔
12
0.27%
👏
11
0.247%
😱
4
0.09%
🥰
3
0.067%
🎉
1
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بورس و بهشتی که منتظر ماست!
هنگی سامانه تاثیر خاصی در روند معاملات نداشت اگر چه بی تاثیر نبود ولی باعث این شرایط هم نبود.
طبیعی است بازار رشد کرده و عده ای دنبال سیو سود هستند و شهریور ماه هم در مجموع ماه تسویه اعتبارات و شناسایی سود و ... هست.
از اصلاح شاخص نترسید که لازمهی ادامه روند است. بدون اصلاح میانه، خریدار تازه نفس وارد بازار نخواهد شد. این را گفتم تا دیدگاه من برای عزیزان روشن شود. یک شاخهی اصلاحی از باز…
با صحبتهای دیشب پزشکیان مبنی بر نبود دلار و احتمال بالا رفتن بیشتر قیمت دلار، خروج نقدینگی سنگینی از درآمدهای ثابت و بخشی هم بورس داره اتفاق میوفته.( تا این لحظه ۲.۵همت از درامد ثابت و ۵۰۰ میلیارد تومان از بورس خارج شده)
مقصد این نقدینگی به نظر من با این وضعیت سیاسی، دلار و طلا خواهد بود.
@emacoabbasi
نتیجه خبرهای فیک آکسیوس در این چند ماه نوسانگیری ترامپ و دوستانش در بازارهای مالی بود و امروز هم شدیدترین تحریمها علیه ایران اعمال شد.
به نظر من مهمتر از این خبر, واکنش احتمالی ایران در برابر این ماجراست. اگر اقتصاد ما به سمت صادرات و واردات صفر میل کند بعید است ایران هم دست روی دست بگذارد و تماشاچی باشد! به نظرم به زودی ایران هم واکنش نشان خواهد داد و این واکنش صرفا یک بیانیه و یا مصاحبه نخواهد بود!
@emacoabbasi
#اهرم روزانه
در محدوده ساپلای زون شاهد یک 3D (مربوط به تایم فریم های کوچک تر) هستیم که به نظر کپس آن پرایس در حال تشکیل است و انتظار میرود بعد از کمی رنج زنی ، ریجکت از این ساپلای زون انجام شود.
همچنین ضعف در ساختار کندل ها مشهود است.
به صورت کلاسیک نیز یک کنج صعودی ( به معنای ریزشی) در محدوده ساپلای زون شکل گرفته است.
این تحلیل میتواند اشتباه باشد و صرفا بررسی بازار است. هیچ توصیه ای به خرید و فروش ندارد.
@emac…
ترامپ از آغاز جنگ گسترده اقتصادی گفته! و از طرفی همتی هم فروش نفت رو تقریبا صفر اعلام کرده!
همین دوعامل بر اقتصاد ما فشار وارد میکنه. در اوایل دهه ۹۰ با افزایش تحریمها استارت رشد دلار زده شد. دلار اگر یک بار دیگه خیز برداره قطعا مقاومت روانی ۲۰۰ هزار تومان رو خواهد شکست.
این فشار اقتصادی قطعا شرکتهای صادراتی رو تحت تاثیر قرار خواهد داد. پاییز سختی پیش روی اقتصاد کشور قرار داره.
@emacoabbbasi
وزارت خارجه امارات:
🔻تا اطلاع ثانوی تمام تجارت،مبادلات تجاری و تراکنشهای مالی با ایران متوقف شد/انتخاب
به نظر من توقف مبادلات مالی و تجاری امارات با ایران، اگر ادامهدار باشد، میتواند روی بازار ارز اثر جدی بگذارد.
واقعیت این است که بخش مهمی از نقلوانتقالات ارزی ایران از مسیر امارات و حواله درهم انجام میشود و درهم هم همیشه یکی از نرخهای مهم برای جهتدهی به دلار تهران بوده.
اگر این مسیر محدود شود، هزینه جابهج…
تحلیل #اهرم - روزانه
با توجه به واگرایی ها که تاییدیه تحلیل هستند، میتواند یک اصلاح در پیش داشته باشد تا ساختار اصلاحی تکمیل شود.
دقت کنید با توجه به موقعیت قیمت و امواج، چارت تک سناریو نیست اما با علائمی که روی چارت داریم، احتمال اصلاح روی این نماد وجود دارد. کادر قرمز رنگ مقاومت مهمی برای نماد است.
لطفا مبنای معاملات قرار ندهید.
@emacoabbasi
👍47👎31❤14🤣11😱2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @emacoabbasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در حال پول بک به حمایت شکسته شده و مرز روانی ۵ میلیون هست.44%
اصلاحش تموم شده و از نقطه ارزندگی مطلق برگشت صعودی زده سقف ۵۳۵۰ رو رد میکنه25%
اصلاح قیمتیش تموم شده ولی اصلاح زمانی باقی مونده32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@emacoabbasi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@emacoabbbasi named in 6 posts, 21 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تحلیل سهم @tahlilsahm66 · 28,475 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور @vahidkeshmirypour · 25,879 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Capital DNA @Capital_DNA · 27,300 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
روانشناسی بورس(بازارهای مالی ) @ravanbors · 39,771 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
آموزش بازار سرمایه بصورت فیلم وصوت ومتن @amozeshbors98 · 56,764 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
سلطان بورس @soltanboure · 25,850 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
مهدی میرزایی (انستیتو امواج الیوت) @mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,362 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
اقتصاد امروز « بازار سرمایه » @Eghtesad_Emroz · 36,123 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
فاند پلاس @fundplus1 · 28,028 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
سالار صفائی @salarsafaie · 46,017 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
فردین سلطانی (محافظ) @boursivared · 1,959 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
POSITIVE WAVE @waveplus · 28,609 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز- @shakhesesabz · 32,256 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
️️مثبت سبز @Mosbat_sabz · 33,978 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
محسن حسنلو @MohsenHasanlu · 26,865 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
سیگنال رایگان (آفاق) @SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,460 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
کدال تحلیل @codal_tahlil · 55,655 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
اندیشه @andiiishe · 33,516 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
پرویز خالقی @permanet5160 · 63,531 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
سینا رهبرشهلان @sinarahbarshahlan · 25,861 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
هوشمند @HOSHMANDchannell · 26,165 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محسن عباسی” (@emacoabbasi), 17,525 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emacoabbasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.