Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Enigmatic Ghost-cluster

Channel

Enigmatic Ghost-cluster

@enigmaticmemes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,238subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001222742641
TypeChannel
Username@enigmaticmemes
Created11 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/enigmaticmemes

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,21110,24110,2266 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,239 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,241 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,228 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,217 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,220 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,212 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,213 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,230 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,228 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,234 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,238 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,232 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,233 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,229 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,223 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,238 subscribers10,2386 August 202617 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,207–10,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:4110,238+15
15 Sept 2026, 14:5910,223-6
14 Sept 2026, 02:4010,229-4
12 Sept 2026, 10:1510,233+1
10 Sept 2026, 03:3810,232-6
6 Sept 2026, 19:1410,238+4
4 Sept 2026, 05:1510,234+6
1 Sept 2026, 21:5410,228-2
31 Aug 2026, 20:4810,230+8
30 Aug 2026, 18:3710,222+1
29 Aug 2026, 21:0510,221+2
28 Aug 2026, 21:2310,219+3
27 Aug 2026, 22:5810,216+3
26 Aug 2026, 22:0610,213+1
25 Aug 2026, 19:0410,212+1
24 Aug 2026, 17:5310,211-9
23 Aug 2026, 02:1510,220+3
21 Aug 2026, 12:2810,217-5
20 Aug 2026, 14:4210,222-2
18 Aug 2026, 10:5310,224first reading

Engagement

451 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.54%
avg views ÷ 10,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
669
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
188
of 451 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 182 of 188 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held451 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total125,828
Reactions total2,923
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 07s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 71 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,988 reactions across 422 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,17319.6%
83213.9%
😭63810.7%
🥰60610.1%
💯4327.21%
🌭3395.66%
🔥2714.53%
💊2203.67%
👀1772.96%
🤯1702.84%
🙏1632.72%
🗿1292.15%
🫡1071.79%
🌚911.52%
821.37%
❤‍🔥731.22%
691.15%
👏590.985%
😍550.919%
🆒470.785%
8 further kinds2554.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 442 of the 451 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 451 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC397 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheBureauOfMemeticWarfareOGPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯13

28 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC397 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @slavtardsVideo

Video, posted without a caption

💯20🔥21🌭1

28 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC425 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @mycusPhoto

Imparate da Reimu. #ReimuHakurei #SanaeKochiya #touhou

🌭6

28 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC415 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @mycusPhoto

sono già uscite le fanart su di lei, nemmeno in tre ore🤣

🌭71💊1

28 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC406 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @mycusPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1

28 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC428 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥰102❤‍🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC450 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @imagesthatgohardVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥17

28 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC452 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @imagesthatgohardPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👀16

28 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC466 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💊7👻4🌭2😭2👏1

28 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC494 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💊146❤‍🔥6🌭4

Showing the 12 most recent of 451 posts we hold for @enigmaticmemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTCAnonymous Poll229 voters

Which one

  1. Red64%
  2. Green36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 451 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

placeholder
@cumtown · 8,484
11 posts
So far, so good
@the_high_council_of_frens · 12,752
4 posts
pussyposting
@amcikposting · 224
3 posts
Shit posting from the front lines
@ShitpostsFromTheFront · 8,071
2 posts
Unlimited Autism Works
@UnlimitedAutismWorks · 62
2 posts
ADC/DAC
@adcdac · 26
2 posts
esoteric vibrations theory 🌻✝️
@esotericvibes · 9,410
2 posts
Gondola Maxxing
@gondolamaxxing · 18
2 posts
Nick’s dump
@nicksdump · 1
2 posts
Pancreas' diabetic glucose reserve
@pancstuff · 12
2 posts
Пил.png🇺🇦
@rudenko2880 · 159
2 posts
Ass and Authentic
@Ass_and_Authentic · 20
1 post
Sunflower Society ヒマワリ会
@Himawarikai · 3,475
1 post
Internet Placeholder Machine
@ISM3003 · 5,016
1 post
Lean Sigma Six for the Developmentally Disabled
@LeanSigmaSixforRetards · 1,855
1 post
The National Justice Party 🎉
@NationalJusticeParty · 6,233
1 post
Unpopular Opinion
@TheUnpopularOpinion · 103
1 post
️I HATE THE ANTICHRIST️
@antichirst · 17,960
1 post
🐎Avian Witches Knight⛩🐎
@avian_doomer · 61
1 post
CHIM Town
@elderscrollz · 1,194
1 post
Esoteric Motivation
@esotericmotivation · 233
1 post
flor de granada
@estailuminada · 31
1 post
Greenpills and Schizoposts (GATE kids welcome)
@greenpills_schizoposts · 914
1 post
Nick Mainländer
@nickmainlander · 162
1 post
Nigliosthetics
@niglio00 · 276
1 post
мой любимый чебурнет🏳️‍🌈💖💕
@nu11chan · 39
1 post
nuthouse 🇺🇦
@nuuuthouse · 529
1 post
you are now officially breathing
@painNagony · 53
1 post
Mild Mannered
@wolfcrier · 1,324
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Touhou.bin🍉🧀
@TouhouBin · 3,074
23 posts
Deranged Posting
@derangedposting · 6,107
18 posts
Wulfgar's Onion Fields 3: Cadian Cortisol Cacaphony Callcenter
@wulfgarsonionfields · 3,486
15 posts
🍦Sfaccimm's Haunted Domain🍥
@Sfaccimmscoalmine · 809
10 posts
The Park
@TheTownPark · 2,655
10 posts
Lean Sigma Six for the Developmentally Disabled
@LeanSigmaSixforRetards · 1,855
9 posts
The Porkchop Express
@theprkchpexprs · 2,402
9 posts
MYCUS Group 🇮🇹🏆🇸🇲
@mycus · 1,220
5 posts
Blofeld’s Undersea Lair (You Only Live Twice)
@UnderwaterLair · 9,367
4 posts
placeholder
@cumtown · 8,484
4 posts
So far, so good
@the_high_council_of_frens · 12,752
4 posts
/dev/stdout
@devstdout · 5,179
3 posts
Pics that go hard
@imagesthatgohard · 5,919
3 posts
Lauritz Channel For ICBM Enthusiasts
@larryslongboat · 1,023
3 posts
/v/ do Brasil
@vdobrasil · 6,422
3 posts
DJT | 日本スレッド
@DailyJapaneseThread · 4,392
2 posts
Blockchain & GenAI are Stupid
@NonsenseFundingTwerps · 3,405
2 posts
/BMW/ - The Bureau of Memetic Warfare
@TheBureauOfMemeticWarfareOG · 6,425
2 posts
aiwen's gemerald extraction facility
@aiwenxd · 2,855
2 posts
The Alchemist's Shack
@alchemistsshack · 1,551
2 posts
Pipkin Pippa of Phase-Connect [/vt/ fan archive] 🔌🐇 Pipipipipipipi
@cutestrabbit · 1,046
2 posts
The Aureus Press
@theAureusPress · 8,166
2 posts
Umamusume shitpost channel
@umamumuse · 501
2 posts
Punished Clossington
@Chossingston · 4,382
1 post
Sunflower Society ヒマワリ会
@Himawarikai · 3,475
1 post
Internet Placeholder Machine
@ISM3003 · 5,016
1 post
Institute for Male Supremacy
@InstituteforMaleSupremacy · 5,564
1 post
Libtard Owners Anonymous
@LOALLC · 4,498
1 post
Pills for Thrills
@PollsForTrolls · 2,294
1 post
Shit posting from the front lines
@ShitpostsFromTheFront · 8,071
1 post
Nwabudike’s stash
@kissmacock · 315
1 post
mapgleos ✙ #УкрТґ
@mapgleos · 2,554
1 post
🏛🏺🍇The Pibacle at Delphi🍇🏺🏛
@neupibalsland · 1,582
1 post
Primal Literature
@primalstudy · 380
1 post
RAM RANCH & BIG SNEED INC.
@ram_ranch · 7,277
1 post
[🍎] romu's pankository
@romu_neko · 2,925
1 post
Free Open Source Posthumanism
@shitposthumanism · 11,969
1 post
Shitposting is a human right
@shitpostinghumanright · 219
1 post
Slavtards
@slavtards · 4,914
1 post
Texalian Gaming Epic Moments
@texaliangamingepicmoments · 1,292
1 post
REAL vi improved(not a jeet)
@theneovim · 3,122
1 post
TouhouShitpost.exe
@touhourandom · 4,323
1 post
1 trillion beers™
@trillionbeers · 1,552
1 post
USA Kino
@usakino · 6,093
1 post
🍂Enigmatic Anime🍂 A Way to Fall☔️
@weebposting · 4,081
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes · 28,158
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 10 September 2026
i don't know how to be funny anymore
@everyone · 77,973
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 September 2026
Hacker News
@hackernewslive · 28,227
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Enigmatic Ghost-cluster” (@enigmaticmemes), 10,238 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enigmaticmemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.