Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ️I HATE THE ANTICHRIST️

Channel

️I HATE THE ANTICHRIST️

@antichirst

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,960subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432950893
TypeChannel
Username@antichirst
Created22 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/antichirst

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,92618,07818,0026 August 2026 — 18,078 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,078 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,071 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,069 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,065 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,060 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,052 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,046 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,042 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,034 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,039 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,037 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,029 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,017 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,013 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,004 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,001 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,994 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,990 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,986 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,979 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,971 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,970 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,978 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,976 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,975 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,971 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,954 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,949 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,943 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,926 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,960 subscribers17,9606 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,903–18,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:4017,960+34
16 Sept 2026, 09:2117,926-17
14 Sept 2026, 11:3617,943-6
12 Sept 2026, 19:4117,949-5
10 Sept 2026, 20:0017,954-17
7 Sept 2026, 18:3917,971-4
4 Sept 2026, 19:5717,975-1
3 Sept 2026, 06:0717,976-2
2 Sept 2026, 00:0517,978+8
31 Aug 2026, 21:5817,970-1
29 Aug 2026, 17:2517,971-8
28 Aug 2026, 17:2317,979-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:3217,986-4
26 Aug 2026, 23:0517,990-4
26 Aug 2026, 00:2917,994-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:3418,001-3
23 Aug 2026, 20:1618,004-9
20 Aug 2026, 22:3818,013-4
19 Aug 2026, 23:3418,017-12
19 Aug 2026, 00:3418,029first reading

Engagement

220 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 17,960 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 220 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held220 (2 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total129,698
Reactions total4,654
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47m 29s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,514 reactions across 213 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3,80626.2%
🤣1,59611.0%
9506.55%
🍌9056.24%
🥰7875.42%
💯7735.33%
😭5994.13%
5373.70%
🔥4413.04%
3222.22%
🤮3132.16%
🤯2841.96%
🫡2651.83%
🤡2041.41%
💩1691.16%
👍1681.16%
❤‍🔥1390.958%
🗿1380.951%
😢1370.944%
😎1360.937%
48 further kinds1,84512.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 220 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,974 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 220 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antichirst. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 220 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC269 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣13😭12🥴1😁1

3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC999 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯39😁19🤣6🍌1

2 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,100 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @gentoomemesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥346🤣5😱5🍌3😁3

2 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC≈1,540 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🎉246😁5

2 Sept 2026, 00:33 UTC≈1,320 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @romu_repoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁46🌚92💊2🍌1

1 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,880 views62 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯37🤷‍♂11😁7🔥41🍌1💩1

1 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC≈1,840 views105 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @WorkingMenMemesPhoto

Troon chemicals good? 💊

💯85😁143🤔2🍌1

1 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC≈1,980 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤮34🏆20😁14🐳5😭4🍌1

1 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC≈2,010 views113 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🫡7029😈5🍌3😁3👏1💅1🥰1

31 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC≈2,560 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

4522🤗9🤯4🍌2🔥1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,950 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @gentoomemesPhoto

• dude drops $2000 on a DJI robot vacuum like a lunatic • refuses to use the normal app like a peasant • Sammy Azdoufal fires up Claude to crack the API so he can drive it with an xbox controller • Claude delivers the goods • pulls an auth token from their servers, connects successfully • except the system thinks he controls 7000 vacuums • checks again • yep, seven thousand • DJI built authentication with zero device

🤣58🗿7😁43🍌1👻1

Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @antichirst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

placeholder
@cumtown · 8,484
3 posts
esoteric vibrations theory 🌻✝️
@esotericvibes · 9,410
3 posts
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,826
2 posts
🦫BEAVER_ϟCALPER69🦫
@beaverkiller · 188
2 posts
severe shitposting society
@lemonposts · 440
2 posts
random reposts
@randomreposts · 54
2 posts
badGoy productions
@Badgoyproductions · 2
1 post
Digital Monkey Business
@Digital_Monkey_Business · 265
1 post
Dustin Levitt
@DustinLevitt · 52
1 post
Cobson's Crunchy Cheese Factory
@JSLLC · 7,032
1 post
обзоRRщики 3000♿️
@OBZORRWIKIXDXDDXD · 23
1 post
Blofeld’s Undersea Lair (You Only Live Twice)
@UnderwaterLair · 9,367
1 post
🅥🅔🅔🅑🅞🅑 Channel - billions must pumpkin react
@Veebbob · 690
1 post
Alternative Timeline
@alternativetimeline · 72
1 post
Schizophrenic live
@autism1488 · 9
1 post
4chan biz
@biz4chan · 10
1 post
Cicero’s forum
@cicerosforum · 7
1 post
Cicerus' Channel
@ciceruschannel1 · 333
1 post
cope and sneed
@copeandsneed · 5
1 post
Dolboeb-driven Development
@dddevelopment · 732
1 post
Dirlebanger
@dirlebanger · 2,859
1 post
Need clussy.
@honkfonk · 24
1 post
Houghton Soldaten SA
@houghtonsoldatensa · 33
1 post
🧟‍♂Spooky Steamed Memeballs: goblin mode 😈
@memes_mf · 16,199
1 post
i have internet instead of personality (Morbius strip edition)
@memezone69 · 6,632
1 post
Nick Mainländer
@nickmainlander · 162
1 post
Nigliosthetics
@niglio00 · 276
1 post
Non cents behave your
@noncentsbehaveyour · 380
1 post
NonnoPostaggio
@nonnopostaggio · 21
1 post
The Federal Reserve 2.0
@pastaniggersucksballs · 63
1 post
Bagby's Corner
@pensivepelican · 690
1 post
Προοπτική Βάτραχου
@prooptiki · 239
1 post
усрусія
@usrusiya · 10,118
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Cobson's Crunchy Cheese Factory
@JSLLC · 7,032
6 posts
Deranged Posting
@derangedposting · 6,107
5 posts
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,826
4 posts
Wulfgar's Onion Fields 3: Cadian Cortisol Cacaphony Callcenter
@wulfgarsonionfields · 3,486
4 posts
Old Menes
@ancientmenes · 560
3 posts
The Porkchop Express
@theprkchpexprs · 2,402
3 posts
/g/'s Tech Memes
@gentoomemes · 28,158
2 posts
𝐊𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐠 🐈⚡️
@kittenposting · 7,232
2 posts
[🍎] romu's pankository
@romu_neko · 2,925
2 posts
4chan webm dump
@webms_4chan · 14,645
2 posts
Cerberus
@CerberusShitPosting · 234
1 post
Punished Clossington
@Chossingston · 4,382
1 post
CRISPR/GNUGUN Coopernetties
@GNUGUN · 8,122
1 post
the Memewaffen IV
@HBMW88 · 8,159
1 post
Roast Beef Unleashed
@RoastBeefUnleashed · 2,372
1 post
Shadowman311's Manic Musings
@ShadowmansManicMusings · 4,996
1 post
Special News Unit 🎗
@SpecialNewsUnit · 1,347
1 post
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 105,801
1 post
The Park
@TheTownPark · 2,655
1 post
Blofeld’s Undersea Lair (You Only Live Twice)
@UnderwaterLair · 9,367
1 post
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 322,872
1 post
DoomPosting
@doomposting · 7,901
1 post
Enigmatic Ghost-cluster
@enigmaticmemes · 10,238
1 post
Scopae Legiones 🗡🏛
@heilfrauisabitch · 814
1 post
Internet puke
@internetpuke · 17,381
1 post
Jeet Street Eats
@jeetstreet · 257
1 post
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 404,186
1 post
[💎] romu's hypergemmytory
@romu_repo · 6,957
1 post
S̸̈ͅC̵̺͒H̷̰̤͚̀I̵ ͔Z̵̬̼͗O̴̝̺̐͋͌P̴̹̹̙̾̒̑Ǒ̶͚͐̎S̵̭͕̔͗T̸͙̔͘͜Į̸̂N̴̰̈́͘G̴̫̩̜͑̍͝
@schizopost1ng · 3,002
1 post
/slashbiz/ The officially licensed original /slashbiz/ community. WWIII brintpocalypse zionazi psyop RIP Harry Yeh edition
@slashbiz_mirror · 79
1 post
USA Kino
@usakino · 6,093
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“️I HATE THE ANTICHRIST️” (@antichirst), 17,960 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antichirst.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.