Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
10,800 average views per post against 14,032 subscribers — an engagement rate of 76.6%. Across the 7,148 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.96% and 14.1%, with a median of 7.04%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (20 August 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (0 exact, 20 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
215,060
Mature posts only
86.2% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 19 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 43 days, net +7,026. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,938–15,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:58
14,032
+441
17 Sept 2026, 03:38
13,591
+349
15 Sept 2026, 00:58
13,242
+134
13 Sept 2026, 08:19
13,108
+238
11 Sept 2026, 14:01
12,870
+458
8 Sept 2026, 20:39
12,412
+303
5 Sept 2026, 14:00
12,109
+144
3 Sept 2026, 16:16
11,965
+137
2 Sept 2026, 08:12
11,828
+81
1 Sept 2026, 10:13
11,747
+167
31 Aug 2026, 08:38
11,580
+180
30 Aug 2026, 11:12
11,400
+211
29 Aug 2026, 14:26
11,189
+192
28 Aug 2026, 14:34
10,997
+272
27 Aug 2026, 11:04
10,725
+447
26 Aug 2026, 10:37
10,278
+84
25 Aug 2026, 09:22
10,194
+82
24 Aug 2026, 11:25
10,112
+1,220
20 Aug 2026, 15:27
8,892
+134
17 Aug 2026, 17:16
8,758
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
76.6%
avg views ÷ 14,032 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
43 (4 September 2025 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
215,060
Reactions total
5,867
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36m 38s
Average length
18m 19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,529 reactions across 43 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,800
57.7%
🤣
1,909
14.1%
👍
1,527
11.3%
🔥
583
4.31%
💔
485
3.58%
❤🔥
281
2.08%
😭
156
1.15%
💅
126
0.931%
🍌
101
0.747%
😁
81
0.599%
😨
52
0.384%
🍓
50
0.37%
💋
50
0.37%
🙏
37
0.273%
😐
31
0.229%
👏
29
0.214%
🐳
25
0.185%
😱
18
0.133%
🗿
16
0.118%
🥰
16
0.118%
25 further kinds
156
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همونطور که خدمتتون عرض کردم تعداد ثبتنامیها کمتر از نظرسنجی بود ولی قبل از اینکه بخوام ظرفیت رو ببندم تقریبا ساعت ۴:۱۷ سقف تراکنشهام پر شد و بعد این ساعت فقط چند نفر از طریق بلو به بلو تونستن واریز کنن
دوستانی که به مشکل خوردن فردا (پنجشنبه) صبح پیام بدن چون قبل ساعت ۱۲ شب اصلا امکان واریز نیست
در مجموع این اعتماد به من برام خوشحال کننده بود و صددرصد تلاشم رو میکنم که جواب اعتماد شما رو بدم
دوستای گلم همونطور که قول دادم صرفنظر از ظرفیت تا ۲۰ دیقه پست ثبتنام رو پاک نکردم
اون بچههایی که مشخصات فرستادن چند ساعت طول میکشه تا ثبتنامشون انجام بشه
اون تعدادی هم که به مشکل کارتبهکارت خوردن فردا(پنجشنبه) صبح به @mhsni8 پیام بدن تا مشکلشون رو حل کنم
بچههای گلم امروز ساعت ۴ رو هماهنگ کردم که همه با هم ثبتنام کنید دیگه نیازی نیست که تکبهتک الان پیام بدید
تو همین کانال همهچیز برای ثبتنام قرار میگیره
چند نفر پیام دادن ساعت ثبتنام ما برقمون قطعه یادم افتاد برم چک کنم دیدم برق خودمم قطعه اون ساعت مجبورم برم بیرون بشینم
اشکال نداره بعضی وقتا یادم میره تو ایران زندگی میکنم
تصور کن اگه پسر باشه و همچین بلایی سرش بیاد مشمول خدمت هم میشه
چون پسرها بعد ۱۸ سالگی فقط یک سال میتونن خدمت نرن و پشت کنکور بمونن
اما توی این فاجعه اون یک سال معافیت رو محروم از کنکور میشن
به همین راحتی مسیر زندگی یه نفر تغییر میکنه
بچهها من بارها تاکید کردم ترتیب چیدمان کدرشتهها فقط علاقهست
به هر زبانی که میتونستم توضیح دادم
حتی نگاه کنید خود سازمان سنجش تو دفترچه سعی کرده به زبانهای مختلف توضیح بده که یه کدرشته رو بالاتر بزنی شانس قبولی رو افزایش نمیده
اما متاسفانه همچنان برای من نقلقول میاد که فلان مشاور گفته ترتیبو یه جوری بزنی که من میگم شانس قبولی میاد بالا
دیگه من توضیح دادم
اینم حرف خود سنجشه
❤214👍14🐳6🔥5🍌1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @entmohseni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@entmohseni edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انتخاب رشته کنکور ۱۴۰۵” (@entmohseni), 14,032 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entmohseni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.