Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
16,200 average views per post against 17,799 subscribers — an engagement rate of 90.8%. Across the 7,801 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.63% and 16.9%, with a median of 8.53%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
290,900
Mature posts only
90.8% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -46,628. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,574–72,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 04:31
17,799
+15
4 Nov 2026, 05:10
17,784
+18
3 Nov 2026, 06:41
17,766
+27
2 Nov 2026, 03:00
17,739
+25
1 Nov 2026, 00:19
17,714
+37
31 Oct 2026, 01:59
17,677
+39
30 Oct 2026, 03:51
17,638
+55
29 Oct 2026, 04:38
17,583
+26
28 Oct 2026, 05:51
17,557
-2
27 Oct 2026, 03:05
17,559
+2
26 Oct 2026, 02:50
17,557
+16
25 Oct 2026, 05:56
17,541
+5
24 Oct 2026, 09:15
17,536
+17
23 Oct 2026, 08:15
17,519
+19
22 Oct 2026, 10:50
17,500
+27
21 Oct 2026, 02:56
17,473
+59
20 Oct 2026, 00:06
17,414
+30
18 Oct 2026, 21:26
17,384
+12
17 Oct 2026, 20:17
17,372
+3
16 Oct 2026, 18:51
17,369
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.1%
avg views ÷ 17,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
65 (16 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
295,040
Reactions total
9,808
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
20
Videos
17
Links
16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
6m 54s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,249 reactions across 65 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18,738
77.3%
🔥
1,419
5.85%
❤🔥
991
4.09%
👍
816
3.37%
😁
716
2.95%
💋
241
0.994%
🗿
230
0.948%
😭
226
0.932%
🌭
223
0.92%
🍓
136
0.561%
🫡
130
0.536%
👏
108
0.445%
🤯
91
0.375%
🥰
68
0.28%
😍
39
0.161%
💯
35
0.144%
💅
30
0.124%
🤝
7
0.029%
🤗
5
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
رایگانه
البته احتمالا یه سری خدمات پولی هم میذارم که هزینههای خودش دربیاد ولی اون چیزی که برای برنامهریزی قولش رو دادم رایگانه
هر ماه هم گسترشش میدم تا نیازهای اصلی رو برطرف بکنه
برای منتشر کردنش هم زیاد سخت نمیگیرم چون بهرحال یه برنامه تو این ابعاد ایراد کوچیک از توش درمیاد که اونم تو عرض یکی دو هفته برطرف میشه
سعی میکنم تا آخر همین هفته برسونم که بتونید از هفته بعد ازش استفاده کنید
پروژهای که حدود یک ماهه روش کار میکنم به مراحل پایانی رسیده و دارم ایراداشو بررسی میکنم
یه اپلیکشن برای برنامهریزی که شما آزمون آزمایشی رو انتخاب میکنی اتوماتیک سرفصلها و حجمش مشخص میشه و میتونی روش برای روزهای هفته برنامهریزی کنی
قابلیت دستی هم داره برای اونایی که با سرفصل آزمون جلو نمیرن
اگه قبلا سایت انتخاب رشته منو دیده باشید entmohseni.com میدونید از این برنامههای شلوغ و پر از امکانات که گیجکننده…
دوستان عزیزم من برنامهای برای پیامرسانهای داخلی ندارم ولی چون خیلی پیام دریافت میکنم که معرفی کن یه لینک بله براتون میذارم صرفاً داشته باشیدش
ble.ir/mathmohseni
بچهها من ترجیحم بر اینه خدماتی بدم که چندهزار نفر ازش استفاده کنن
حتی اگه رایگان نباشه هم هزینهش جوری باشه که همه بتونن از پسش بربیان
رو همین حساب نمیتونم مشاوره فردی داشته باشم
اولش فکر میکردم میشه
ولی وقتی روزی مثلا ۲۰ نفر درخواست مشاوره داشته باشن من دو راه دارم
یا باید کلا رد کنم (در حال حاضر دارم اینکارو میکنم) یا باید یه هزینهای مطرح کنم که تقاضا بیاد پایینتر
الان هم توی بحث محتواسازی کمکارم وگرنه رو…
برای رشته انسانی
اعمال روی پیشامدها یه تست احتمالی کنکوره که با روش این ویدیو میتونید بزنید
(رشته ریاضی و تجربی هم میتونن ببینن میشه فصل یک سال دهم مبحث مجموعه)
🐢 @Mkonkoor 🐢
یکی از مشکلات شما توی برنامهریزی اینه که برنامه آزمونها خیلی خلاصهست فقط گفته از این صفحه تا اون صفحه
دارم سعی میکنم یه دفترچه بسازم که برنامه هر درس با سرفصلها و نکات مهمش رو داشته باشید
❤1,700❤🔥50🫡26💋7🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @mkonkoor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @mkonkoor as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ریاضی با محسنی @enmohseni · 58,029 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
کنکورستان | استاد حسین بنائی @konkourestan_ir · 38,626 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
انتخابرشته به سبک رتبه۴کنکور @dr_sohrabimofrad4_reshte · 19,217 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
گروه راموس | دکتر فرزاد راد @ramous20 · 46,600 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
مشاوره کنکور l پارسا قادری @dr_parsa_gh · 25,723 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
سایت کنکور | Konkur.in @konkur_in · 77,774 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
#mmd @mmd_adm · 25,494 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
مشاوره کنکور|رضاپازوکی @konkoortaster2 · 72,545 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
دکتر سهرابی مفرد|رتبه ۴کنکور @dr_sohrabimofrad_4 · 285,345 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
عربی نهایی با عمّار تاج بخش @emtehan_arabi · 19,909 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
آکادمی مشاوره کنکور الورتبه @alorotbe_konkour · 22,514 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
• کوچه ی دل • @Koucheyedel · 27,024 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
GhachTech | قاچ تِک @ghachtech · 21,392 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کنکور با محسنی” (@mkonkoor), 17,799 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkonkoor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.