Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эрми | Красивый бизнес на WB🤍

Channel

Эрми | Красивый бизнес на WB🤍

@ermi_wb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,487subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001852673008
TypeChannel
Username@ermi_wb
DescriptionЯ Эрми 🌸 Закрыла сеть аптек и ушла на Вайлдбериз! ⚡️Оборот 350 млн / год в заказах ! Обучаю действующих продавцов и с нуля через стратегию и выбор уникального товара 🔹По поводу всех вопросов: @ermii221
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ermi_wb

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,4156,4946,454.57 August 2026 — 6,494 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,491 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,469 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,455 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,457 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,446 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,440 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,436 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,418 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,415 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,422 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,433 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,440 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,464 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,487 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,475 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,478 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,486 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,480 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,488 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,477 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,480 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,487 subscribers6,4877 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,403–6,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 16:066,487+7
31 Oct 2026, 20:276,480+3
29 Oct 2026, 06:186,477-11
26 Oct 2026, 04:176,488+8
23 Oct 2026, 05:386,480-6
20 Oct 2026, 01:006,486+8
17 Oct 2026, 10:376,478+3
14 Oct 2026, 17:406,475-12
11 Oct 2026, 06:016,487+23
4 Oct 2026, 19:006,464+24
25 Sept 2026, 12:176,440+7
17 Sept 2026, 04:176,433+11
13 Sept 2026, 10:216,422+7
9 Sept 2026, 06:176,415-3
3 Sept 2026, 12:586,418-18
31 Aug 2026, 04:126,436-4
27 Aug 2026, 19:546,440-6
24 Aug 2026, 21:036,446-11
20 Aug 2026, 22:356,457+2
17 Aug 2026, 21:336,455first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 6,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
859
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held38 (30 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total13,745
Reactions total831
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,080
Videos
≈242
Links
≈222

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,329 reactions across 35 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥69352.1%
❤41931.5%
👍1047.83%
🙏261.96%
😱161.20%
😢151.13%
👎90.677%
🤝80.602%
❤‍🔥70.527%
⚡50.376%
😁50.376%
🏆40.301%
👏30.226%
🤬30.226%
🌚20.15%
👀20.15%
💔20.15%
🤩20.15%
💯10.075%
😍10.075%
2 further kinds20.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 38 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ermi_wb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 07:31 UTC313 views65 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Ну что, показываю, что у меня получилось! 🔥 Но хочу, чтобы вы понимали: такие видео не для карточек Wildberries. Это контент для брендов, которые привлекают аудиторию через Reels, передают эмоции, атмосферу и смыслы. Здесь мы не просто показываем товар, а создаём целую историю. 📍Я стараюсь добиться максимального реализма: движения, свет, ракурсы, окружающие звуки. Музыку тоже подбираю сама, чтобы всё совпадало по …

🔥44❤10⚡5😱5👎1

5 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC363 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я вышла на новый уровень работы с нейросетями 🥹 На днях прошла ещё одно обучение по ИИ ) уже более сложное. Взяла обычное платье с Wildberries за 1600 рублей и решила создать для него не просто красивый ролик, а настоящую fashion-историю. С атмосферой, движением камеры, разными планами и настроением. 1 фото- это скрин с вб, второе фото - это скрин с видео… Хотите покажу, что вышло? Ставьте 🔥, если интересно! Ду…

🔥51👎3🙏3🤩1

3 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC645 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Результаты первого месяца продаж через собственный сайт 🔥 14 сентября мы запустили продажи через собственный сайт. И сегодня хочу поделиться первыми результатами! Практически весь объём продаж пришёлся на октябрь. 1. ЗАКАЗЫ ✅ Сумма заказов — 3,7 млн ₽ ✅ Средний чек — 8 000 ₽ Для первого полноценного месяца работы сайта, считаю, очень хороший результат! 2. ВЫКУПЫ И ВОЗВРАТЫ ✅Возвраты — 201 тыс. ₽ ✅ Доля возврат…

🔥38👍5❤2🏆1

2 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC712 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Давно обещала вам эфир про сайт ❤️ Ребят, 3–6 ноября пройдёт большая бесплатная онлайн-конференция «Жизнь на маркетплейсах в 2027», где я буду выступать. Расскажу про наш путь от Wildberries к собственному интернет-магазину: как мы к этому пришли, что делали и какие результаты получили. 📍За первый месяц — 3 млн ₽ заказов с маржинальностью 45%. Хочу разобрать, что стоит за этими цифрами. Что нужно подготовить, чт…

🔥9❤5👍1

30 Oct 2026, 06:40 UTC858 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

За этим видео — целый день моей работы 😅 Вот результат, над которым я вчера сидела весь день👇 📍Сначала отдельно создала и анимировала историю с мамой: сайт, заказ, получение капсулы. Потом — историю с дочкой и примеркой и оба кусочка соединила в Edits. Посмотрите особенно на девочку. Как она подходит к коробке, достаёт костюм, смотрит на маму, радуется обновкам 🥹 Эти движения и эмоции — именно то, чего я добивалас…

🔥55❤8😱2👎1

28 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC964 views115 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Пришло время наконец познакомить вас с брендом, которым я по-настоящему горжусь! 💔 Вы столько раз спрашивали, какой бренд стоит за моими результатами, что за сайт мы запустили и какой Instagram так активно развиваем. А я всё скрывала. Боялась, что начнут копировать) ✅Но знаете, что я поняла? Мои модели можно попытаться скопировать, а вот мой мозг, насмотренность и способность создавать то, чего я сама нигде не виж…

❤95🔥12❤‍🔥7😍1

27 Oct 2026, 12:40 UTC893 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ребят, сразу после кружочка оставлю вам контакты Димы, чтобы потом не потеряли‼️ Если сейчас думаете переходить с карго на белый ввоз, советую сразу к нему обратиться. Он поможет разобраться с сертификацией, подготовить все необходимые документы, организовать отправку образцов из Китая, пройти таможенное оформление и передать образцы в лабораторию. Плюс подскажет по дальнейшим поставкам, логистике и таможенным пла…

❤5🔥3🙏3

27 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC736 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8❤4🙏1

26 Oct 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,030 views64 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ну что, дождались? 😁🔥 Я наконец-то начала записывать уроки по искусственному интеллекту. Сегодня записала первые два урока и создала вот таких моделей. Посмотрите на лица! Вы бы отличили их от настоящих людей? 😍 ИИ ЗА ГОД ИЗМЕНИЛСЯ КАРДИНАЛЬНО. Сейчас главное — РЕАЛИЗМ. Никаких пластиковых лиц и типичных ИИшных картинок, мы работаем над тем, чтобы фотографии и видео было практически невозможно отличить от реальной …

🔥51👍7❤3😱2👎1

23 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC990 views44 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

❗️Ошибка больших партий или как предприниматели закапывают деньги в товар, который не продаётся Знаете, какую ошибку я чаще всего вижу у предпринимателей? Они находят товар, который хорошо продаёт конкурент, и сразу заказывают большую партию. Без тестов и без проверки спроса именно на их товар, просто потому что увидели похожий товар у конкурента или тренд завирусился . Например 👇 Недавно мне написала одна подпи…

🔥30❤7👍5👏2

21 Oct 2026, 14:43 UTC923 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

роже конкурентов и при этом зарабатываем? 📍Я конечно зарылась в работу по сайту, но на вб тоже все неплохо )) Сейчас наши детские костюмы стоят 7–8 тысяч рублей. Это минимум на 30% дороже большинства аналогичных предложений. И постоянно слышу, что на WB без ИУ нет экономики, но я так не считаю )) Покажу немного цифр из трустатс за первые 20 дней октября: — Заказы — 45,5 млн ₽ — Реализация — 15,4 млн ₽ — Чистая пр…

❤18🔥12👍3

15 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,100 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Про сайт , инстаграм и трафик Слушайте x2))

❤16🔥13💯1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @ermi_wb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Oct 2026, 12:27 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Нужен эфир по сайту и трафику с инста ?

  1. Да91%
  2. Нет3%
  3. Я все знаю6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTCAnonymous Poll285 voters

Будете ли переходить на FBS?

  1. Всегда работал по FBS11%
  2. Перехожу на FBS62%
  3. Ухожу с WB15%
  4. Весь товар сгорел , не с чем выходить16%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

Кто за оффлайн встречу в Москве ?

  1. Я 100% за60%
  2. Не вижу смысла40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ушел из Газпрома на Wildberries
@nashputwildberries · 51,586
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
Курятник 🪺 Продвижение на маркетплейсах.
@kudahiko · 44,026
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
Майя Драган. ИИ на всю катушку
@mayyadragan · 21,237
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
Овчинников | ВБ по полочкам
@wbpopolochcam · 55,087
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Клуб партнёров на маркетплейсах
@club_partners · 20,164
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 September 2026
Жаркова Лиля | Реклама WB и Ozon
@target_i_pr · 20,250
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 September 2026
Аналитик на миллиард | Wildberries
@wbbillion · 23,319
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
Селлеры и Менеджеры, Инфографика, Вакансии и резюме WB OZON YM
@sellerman · 58,175
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эрми | Красивый бизнес на WB🤍” (@ermi_wb), 6,487 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ermi_wb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.