Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Evolutamente.it

Channel

Evolutamente.it

@evolutamente

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,428subscribers

+821 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439050519
TypeChannel
Username@evolutamente
DescriptionIl canale Telegram di Evolutamente.it - Angelo Rossiello
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/evolutamente

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6067,4287,0176 August 2026 — 6,607 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,606 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,615 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,625 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,656 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,730 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,809 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,901 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,930 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,018 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,054 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,093 subscribers2 October 2026 — 7,212 subscribers9 October 2026 — 7,291 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,308 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,317 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,324 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,338 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,386 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,395 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,409 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,428 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 90 days, net +821. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,483–7,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 15:357,428+19
1 Nov 2026, 18:107,409+14
29 Oct 2026, 14:067,395+9
26 Oct 2026, 13:307,386+48
23 Oct 2026, 02:597,338+14
19 Oct 2026, 16:277,324+7
16 Oct 2026, 21:117,317+9
14 Oct 2026, 02:557,308+17
9 Oct 2026, 06:567,291+79
2 Oct 2026, 09:387,212+119
16 Sept 2026, 20:207,093+39
13 Sept 2026, 02:387,054+36
9 Sept 2026, 05:547,018+88
3 Sept 2026, 13:016,930+29
31 Aug 2026, 13:536,901+92
28 Aug 2026, 18:246,809+79
25 Aug 2026, 09:236,730+74
22 Aug 2026, 02:266,656+23
18 Aug 2026, 18:036,633+8
12 Aug 2026, 15:546,625first reading

Engagement

154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 7,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
594
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 154 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held154 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total23,769
Reactions total281
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈16,900
Videos
≈1,680
Links
≈18,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,135 reactions across 131 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏31327.6%
👍29425.9%
❤26423.3%
🔥746.52%
😁696.08%
🤬484.23%
🙏121.06%
💯100.881%
🤝100.881%
😡80.705%
✍50.441%
🎉50.441%
🥰50.441%
⚡40.352%
🤨40.352%
❤‍🔥20.176%
😐20.176%
🫡20.176%
🍾10.088%
👀10.088%
2 further kinds20.176%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC457 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🏳️‍⚧️ "AMO I BAMBINI TRANS": L'AMERICA HA ELETTO SENATORE L'UOMO CHE LO DICE Martedì il Texas ha mandato al Senato degli Stati Uniti James Talarico. Primo democratico a vincere una competizione statale in Texas dal 1994. Giovane, ex insegnante, seminarista presbiteriano, capace di citare la Bibbia meglio di un pastore. E autore di una frase che, detta in Italia, chiuderebbe una carriera in tre ore: "Amo i bambini tr…

❤4👍2🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC438 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🔬 PFIZER E MODERNA NON SONO LA STESSA COSA. E ORA NON LO DICE UN TWEET: LO DICE UN PAPER PEER-REVIEWED. Retsef Levi, professore al MIT Sloan, commenta il lavoro appena uscito: "In coorti strettamente appaiate di quasi 2 milioni di vaccinati Moderna e Pfizer in Florida, i secondi hanno mostrato una mortalità sostanzialmente più alta per tutte le cause, cardiaca, non-COVID e COVID (ndr. sono attribuzioni senza senso) …

👏3❤1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC401 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Facebook La mia faccia quando l'esperto di spiega SENZA ALCUN RIFERIMENTO (TRIAL DI LUNGA DURATA) che la VITAMINA D ha effetti extrascheletrici, che 30ng/mL "è poco", ha effetti cardiovascolari, ha effetti sul sistema immunitario, funzioni epigenetiche e sul sistema neurologico. TUTTO ESECRABILE...

😁10👀1

5 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC564 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🩸 IL TUO 18 NG/ML NON È UNA CARENZA. È IL PREZZO DI TRE SETTIMANE DI CARICO. Un triatleta che conosco si ammala a febbraio, sta fermo due settimane, rientra, e da lì non torna più: le ripetute non salgono, dorme peggio, la gamba non guarisce. Fa le analisi. Diciotto nanogrammi per millilitro di 25(OH)D. Gli dicono che è carente, gli danno una capsula, e la storia finisce lì come se avessero trovato la causa. Il pun…

👏2

5 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC525 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🦴 UN MEDICO HA PRESCRITTO QUESTE GOCCE PER UN PIEDE ROTTO. E SULLA SCATOLA C'È SCRITTO CHE NON HANNO INDICAZIONI APPROVATE. Un medico ha prescritto queste gocce per una frattura composta del piede. Non per un mal di gola o un po' di stanchezza: per un osso rotto. Cos'è davvero. Un medicinale omeopatico di Pharmextracta: Calcium fluoratum D6 e D12, Magnesium phosphoricum D6 e D12, Silicea D6 e D12 in soluzione alcol…

❤6👍4🤨1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC502 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

💡 TRE DOMANDE CHE TORNANO SEMPRE. E LA RISPOSTA SI DÀ DI PERSONA. Qual è la lampada migliore per me? Come si usa? Che differenza c'è tra fototerapia e fotobiomodulazione? Sono le tre domande che ricevo più spesso, e a cui per messaggio rispondo sempre male. Perché la risposta giusta dipende da cosa devi fare, da quanta luce prendi durante il giorno, da come sei fatto tu e da cosa ti serve davvero. Cose che in una ch…

❤3👍2

5 Nov 2026, 08:47 UTC484 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🧪 IL TOFU NON BATTE IL FORMAGGIO. Il tofu primo su venti alimenti proteici, il cheddar ultimo. Titolo: "il tofu batte carne e formaggi". Non è quello che dice lo studio. Il punteggio è composito: nutrizione, prezzo, CO2 (del cazzo). Due voci su tre non riguardano l'alimento. Il formaggio è tra le fonti proteiche più digeribili e più dense di aminoacidi essenziali. Se è ultimo è perchè inquinerebbe e per il prezzo. …

👍6❤2

5 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC546 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

🧂 IL SALE NON TI UCCIDE. IL CONSIGLIO DI TOGLIERLO, FORSE SÌ. Ti hanno detto di ridurre il sale per la pressione. È uno dei consigli più ripetuti della medicina moderna, e uno dei più fragili davanti ai numeri veri. Cosa dicono i dati. PURE, Lancet 2016 (PMID 27216139): 133.118 persone in 49 paesi. Il sodio alto aumenta eventi e mortalità negli ipertesi, e non nei normotesi. Il sodio basso, sotto i 3 grammi al gior…

👍3❤2

4 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC665 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Intanto a Brescia... Ad una conferenza della dr.ssa Tomasi

👍5❤3

4 Nov 2026, 18:29 UTC700 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🦴 OSSA? PRIMA TI ALLENI. Una review su Experimental Physiology spiega cosa accade quando il corpo smette di muoversi: atrofia muscolare rapida, resistenza anabolica, osso che si sfalda, miostatina in salita e irisina in calo. In giorni, non in anni. Altri rimedi: allenamento contro resistenza con proteine a 1,2-1,5 grammi per chilo, e solo come aggiunta HMB, creatina e vitamina D. La vitamina D è l'ultima voce del…

👍8❤1

4 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC660 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Giornalismo di altissimo livello

🤬7😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @evolutamente. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@evolutamente edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Cristina Tomasi
@drcristinatomasi · 28,091
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎
@dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,427
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Evolutamente.it” (@evolutamente), 7,428 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evolutamente.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.