Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +845. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,273–28,451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:37
28,280
+2
14 Sept 2026, 15:42
28,278
+3
13 Sept 2026, 05:00
28,275
-10
11 Sept 2026, 09:38
28,285
+11
8 Sept 2026, 11:58
28,274
+10
5 Sept 2026, 07:16
28,264
-12
3 Sept 2026, 09:23
28,276
-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:57
28,284
-12
1 Sept 2026, 02:58
28,296
-7
31 Aug 2026, 00:04
28,303
+15
30 Aug 2026, 01:04
28,288
-14
29 Aug 2026, 00:32
28,302
-13
28 Aug 2026, 01:52
28,315
+35
26 Aug 2026, 22:57
28,280
+31
25 Aug 2026, 20:34
28,249
-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:54
28,251
+13
23 Aug 2026, 07:46
28,238
+410
21 Aug 2026, 17:46
27,828
+131
19 Aug 2026, 13:33
27,697
+8
18 Aug 2026, 14:27
27,689
first reading
Engagement
73 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 28,280 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,510
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.778%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 73 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
73 (6 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
178,770
Reactions total
1,390
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈75
Links
≈265
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,956 reactions across 73 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,178
53.4%
👍
2,204
37.0%
👏
328
5.51%
👎
77
1.29%
🔥
54
0.907%
🙏
16
0.269%
🥰
16
0.269%
🤔
12
0.201%
💯
10
0.168%
👌
8
0.134%
😱
8
0.134%
❤🔥
6
0.101%
😁
6
0.101%
🤗
5
0.084%
🤣
5
0.084%
🤮
5
0.084%
🤬
4
0.067%
😢
3
0.05%
😨
3
0.05%
✍
2
0.034%
5 further kinds
6
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🦴 DIABETE DI TIPO 2: UNA DEXA NORMALE NON RACCONTA TUTTA LA STORIA
Fenici, oggi vi porto uno studio veramente interessante per l’osso. È un documento di consenso pubblicato nel 2026 sulla salute delle ossa nelle persone con diabete. Il messaggio è questo: la densità ossea può risultare normale, o persino elevata, mentre il rischio di frattura resta aumentato.
La DEXA misura la quantità di minerale nell’osso. Per ca…
Buongiorno a tutti!
Alcuni hanno riferito di avere ricevuto una mail di acquisto di prodotti da loro non acquistati: ho verificato e l’informatico mi ha detto di dirvi di ignorare questa email perché stiamo modificando la Website e sono partite per errore.
Buona giornata
🦴 PUOI FRATTURARTI ANCHE SENZA AVERE UN T-SCORE DA OSTEOPOROSI
Fenici, questo è uno studio che voglio farvi conoscere perché mette in discussione un errore molto comune:
👉 pensare che, se il T-score non è ≤ −2,5, allora il rischio di frattura sia basso.
Non è necessariamente così.
Un nuovo studio pubblicato su Bone ha analizzato 38.525 donne dai 50 anni in su, valutando il rischio di frattura attraverso il FRAX, ch…
🦴 PIÙ VITAMINA D = MENO FRATTURE? NON SEMPRE.
Fenici, questo studio è importante perché smonta un’idea molto diffusa:
👉 se la vitamina D è importante per l’osso, allora prenderne di più dovrebbe ridurre le fratture.
Non è così semplice.
Un nuovo RCT pubblicato su Bone ha seguito 2.495 persone per 5 anni, confrontando:
• placebo
• vitamina D3 1.600 UI/die
• vitamina D3 3.200 UI/die
La popolazione studiata aveva …
🔥 DIABETE TIPO 2: QUANTO PUÒ FARE DAVVERO LO STILE DI VITA?
Fenici, questo studio merita attenzione perché mette insieme i dati di ben 42 studi randomizzati controllati, per un totale di 9.586 adulti con diabete tipo 2.
📚 Tran Thi My & Watthayu N.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2026
I ricercatori hanno analizzato l’efficacia degli interventi non farmacologici sul controllo metabolico.
E cosa emerge?
Ri…
❤️ MENOPAUSA, TOS E CUORE: IL TIMING POTREBBE FARE LA DIFFERENZA
Un nuovo studio pubblicato su JAMA Internal Medicine ha analizzato 2.737 donne di mezza età con sintomi vasomotori, senza precedenti cardiovascolari.
755 donne hanno iniziato una terapia ormonale menopausale.
📊 Dopo circa 20 anni di osservazione, l’inizio della TOS era associato a un rischio cardiovascolare inferiore del 22% rispetto al mancato utili…
💉 "Microdosi" di semaglutide: cosa dice davvero il primo studio grande
Le "microdosi" dei farmaci GLP-1 sono ovunque sui social: dosi più basse, meno effetti collaterali, stessi risultati. Vero? Ora c'è il primo dataset grande — e va letto con attenzione.
Un preprint (quindi: non ancora revisionato da altri scienziati) su quasi 30.000 utenti di un programma comportamentale americano riporta che a 16 settimane:
▫️ …
🧂 Iodio: la carenza dimenticata
C'è un minerale da cui dipende letteralmente lo sviluppo del cervello. E no, non è il magnesio.
La tiroide costruisce i suoi ormoni con un solo mattone insostituibile: lo iodio. Una nuova revisione Cochrane ha messo insieme 8 trial randomizzati (2.528 bambini e adolescenti, per lo più in aree con carenza iodica) e ha confrontato la supplementazione con il placebo:
▫️ lieve miglioram…
PERIMENOPAUSA: E SE DUE ALLENAMENTI A SETTIMANA FOSSERO GIÀ IN GRADO DI CAMBIARE MUSCOLO E OSSO?
Fenici, questo studio mi piace moltissimo perché parla di una fase che spesso viene trascurata: la perimenopausa e i primi anni dopo la menopausa.
È proprio lì che iniziano ad accelerare due processi che poi diventano clinicamente importanti:
👉 perdita di massa e forza muscolare
👉 perdita di densità minerale ossea
❓E a…
Lp(a): il farmaco funziona sul numero, non sugli infarti 🫀
Vi ho parlato spesso della lipoproteina(a), quel valore “genetico” del sangue che molti di voi hanno scoperto di avere alto. Ieri è arrivata una notizia importante.
Cosa è successo
Novartis ha comunicato i risultati di Lp(a)HORIZON, il primo grande studio di fase 3 su pelacarsen, un farmaco che abbatte la Lp(a) fino all’80%. Oltre 8.300 pazienti con malatt…
QUALE ESERCIZIO COSTRUISCE DAVVERO OSSO? 162 STUDI RANDOMIZZATI PROVANO A RISPONDERE
Fenici, quando parliamo di osteoporosi sentiamo sempre la stessa raccomandazione:
“Devi fare movimento.”
Giustissimo. Ma c’è un problema.
👉 Per l’osso, muoversi e allenarsi non sono necessariamente la stessa cosa.
Una nuova meta-analisi pubblicata su Bone ha raccolto addirittura 162 studi randomizzati controllati e 10.475 persone,…
❤120👍47🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @drcristinatomasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@drcristinatomasi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,462 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Cristina Tomasi” (@drcristinatomasi), 28,280 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drcristinatomasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.