Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Matteo Brandi - Canale Ufficiale

Channel

Matteo Brandi - Canale Ufficiale

@MatBrandi

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,301subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467363878
TypeChannel
Username@MatBrandi
DescriptionCanale di Matteo Brandi, presidente di Pro Italia
Created9 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MatBrandi

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

23,28623,31823,3026 August 2026 — 23,318 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,318 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,316 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,312 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,309 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,313 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,316 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,314 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,303 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,300 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,298 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,305 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,304 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,294 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,286 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,288 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,286 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,289 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,286 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,292 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,301 subscribers23,3016 August 202627 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,281–23,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 00:2323,301+9
26 Aug 2026, 01:0423,292+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:3223,286-3
24 Aug 2026, 04:2823,289+3
22 Aug 2026, 12:1923,286-2
20 Aug 2026, 23:1423,288+2
19 Aug 2026, 22:2223,286-8
18 Aug 2026, 20:5823,294-10
17 Aug 2026, 23:2223,304-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:0623,305+7
15 Aug 2026, 14:2323,298-2
14 Aug 2026, 02:3523,300-3
12 Aug 2026, 23:1823,303-11
11 Aug 2026, 21:0223,314-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:3423,316+3
10 Aug 2026, 00:3023,313+4
9 Aug 2026, 02:2123,309-3
8 Aug 2026, 05:1823,312-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:2423,316-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:0123,318first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 23,301 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
84 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held84 (1 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total392,035
Reactions total17,220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,090
Videos
991
Links
5,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 17s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,220 reactions across 84 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏6,10035.4%
🤬3,09718.0%
😁2,18412.7%
👍2,12612.3%
1,94311.3%
💯4682.72%
🔥3442.00%
2311.34%
🙏1560.906%
😢1220.708%
😨900.523%
🗿740.43%
🏆720.418%
😱630.366%
👎500.29%
🎉460.267%
🫡370.215%
😎170.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC635 views50 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgPhoto

Inconsolabili i #giudicicontrolagiustizia: questa volta non c’è nulla che possono fare per liberarlo e rimandarlo a “lavorare” nelle calli veneziane 😢 👉 Segui PRO ITALIA 🇮🇹

🎉31😁14🗿3😢2

Signed Matteo Brandi

26 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈2,300 views199 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgVideo

A Mestre, in provincia di Venezia, la comunità bengalese si dice pronta a scioperare e bloccare fabbriche, cucine, alberghi etc., se il sindaco non autorizza la realizzazione della Moschea. Ecco a cosa portano le politiche globaliote dell’inclusività e dell’accoglienza: a ritrovarci ricattati a casa nostra. Eppure, qualcuno dovrebbe far notare agli amici bengalesi, che se vogliono pregare Allah, un posto ce l’hanno

🤬100👏6120👍15🗿3

Signed Matteo Brandi

26 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈3,170 views106 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Auto guidate da remoto: la nuova follia targata UE. La maestrina europea sta pensando di controllare le nostre auto tramite GPS e IA. In nome della "sicurezza"... Ne ho parlato con Francesco Borgonovo. https://youtu.be/1nZfTXnSdlM?is=WWyUp8B7JAnXvqWt

👍4925😁159👏8

Signed Matteo Brandi

25 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈3,300 views166 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgVideo

Un nuovo Rinascimento architettonico e urbanistico per rilanciare l'Italia e contrastare l'idea distopica di città che hanno in mente i nemici del bello. È possibile. Ma serve la volontà di farlo. 👉 Segui PRO ITALIA 🇮🇹

👍98👏34💯2112🙏1

Signed Matteo Brandi

25 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,340 views126 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgVideo

La vicenda della bimba di quattro anni morta di difterite a Palermo e l’indagine della Procura sui genitori che non l’avevano vaccinata impone di farsi una domanda: in Italia esiste la libertà di cura? Ad oggi la risposta, purtroppo, è molto chiara. Ce ne parla il nostro Giuseppe Pappalardo. 👉 Segui PRO ITALIA 🇮🇹

👏95👍168💯5🤬2

Signed Matteo Brandi

25 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈3,700 views117 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Ma perché questo accanimento contro gli alberi? Il caso di Roma è emblematico: soldi del PNRR, deriva securitaria, tecnologia e ideologia folle. Alla base c'è un'idea malata di città del futuro, la "smart city", dove il centro è in mano a pochi benestanti e la periferia è desertificata. Il mio intervento alla trasmissione Linea Sera su Canale Italia. https://youtu.be/wlRmRNcv-J8

👏75👍2011🤬7💯4

Signed Matteo Brandi

24 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈3,530 views177 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgVideo

Perché stanno tagliando gli alberi nelle nostre città? I motivi sono tanti: i soldi del PNRR, le biomasse, la scusa della sicurezza, la connettività... Ma il più inquietante riguarda l'idea di città del futuro che c'è dietro. Intervento di Matteo Brandi, presidente Pro Italia, alla trasmissione Notizie Oggi su Canale Italia. 👉 Segui PRO ITALIA 🇮🇹

👏140💯238👍5🗿1

Signed Matteo Brandi

24 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈3,450 views161 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_org

24 agosto 2016 - 24 agosto 2026 Sono passati dieci anni dal devastante terremoto che nel 2016 sconvolse il Centro Italia uccidendo 299 persone e distruggendo interi paesi in pochi istanti. Dieci anni. Eppure, a guardare qual è oggi lo stato in cui versano Amatrice, Accumoli, Pescara e Arquata del Tronto, sembra che siano passati dieci mesi. Con novemila cantieri aperti che procedono a spizzichi e bocconi, con centi

👏11527😢10💯8👎1

Signed Matteo Brandi

24 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈3,740 views89 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Il 24 agosto 1942, nelle steppe russe, su un campo di girasoli, a Isbuscenskij, il Reggimento "Savoia Cavalleria" si lanciò alla carica contro un intero battaglione di fanteria siberiana. Un'azione coraggiosa, epica e vittoriosa che lasciò senza parole sia i sovietici che i tedeschi. Vi ripropongo la puntata del mio podcast Ritorno a Esperia dedicata alla carica di Isbuscenskij! https://youtu.be/-CF5D3M9gZg?is=vUKTQh

58👍22🫡6🗿2💯1

Signed Matteo Brandi

23 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈3,750 views145 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @proitalia_orgVideo

A San Donà di Piave, in Vicolo Nuovo, un progetto per un nuovo palazzo di otto piani rischia di cambiare per sempre il volto di un intero quartiere, nonostante le proteste dei residenti e la vicinanza della storica Villa De Faveri. Il nostro Giacomo Del Pio Luogo ci spiega come, quando l’architettura smette di essere un mezzo e diventa un fine, quello che si consuma è soltanto l’ennesimo pulcricidio. 👉 Segui PRO IT

👍89🤬32👏129🙏3

Signed Matteo Brandi

23 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈4,090 views326 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Un saluto dalla zona del Chianti 🍷🍇 Altro che città dei 15 minuti e smart city, viva il paesaggio italiano!

225👏62👍34🗿4😁1

Signed Matteo Brandi

23 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈6,770 views386 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Anni di follie woke e ora dicono di voler fare marcia indietro. Ma i danni che hanno fatto al dibattito pubblico, al mondo dell'arte e della cultura, al linguaggio, persino a livello scolastico, sono innumerevoli. Non vi crede nessuno.

👏249👍58😁4518💯16

Signed Matteo Brandi

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @MatBrandi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MatBrandi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,304 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Matteo Gracis
@matteogracis · 139,596
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Eventi Avversi News
@evncov · 53,443
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Luogocomune2
@luogocomune2 · 48,745
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Byoblu [3.0]
@ByobluOfficial · 85,731
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Cesare Sacchetti
@cesaresacchetti · 61,760
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Gianluigi Paragone
@gianluigi_paragone · 46,904
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale
@RaffaellaRegoli · 47,350
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗭𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗘.𝗜𝗧 - Marcello Pamio
@marcellopamio · 70,199
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Dr. BARBARA BALANZONI (qui doc, video, audio,foto)
@drbarbarabalanzoni · 70,357
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
100 Giorni da Leoni
@centogiornidaleoni · 88,730
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Davide Zedda (Giornalista libero e indipendente. Libero pensiero, libera informazione e controinformazione)
@davide_zedda · 60,063
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo
@comitatofortitudo · 52,044
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
RangeloniNews
@vn_rangeloni · 49,081
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Buffonate di Stato
@buffonatedistato · 74,928
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
l'AntiDiplomatico
@lantidiplomatico · 88,974
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Giubbe Rosse
@rossobruni · 72,163
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗢 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗢
@consenso_disinformato · 54,664
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist
@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist · 115,997
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
Tutti i fatti
@tutti_i_fatti · 50,138
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
NICOLAI LILIN
@nicolaililin · 65,460
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Matteo Brandi - Canale Ufficiale” (@MatBrandi), 23,301 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MatBrandi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.