Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Marco Mori

Channel
@marcomoriofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,041subscribers
-482 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001192702750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marcomoriofficial |
| Created | 28 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marcomoriofficial |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:48 | 22,041 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 22,055 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 22,064 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 22,073 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 22,082 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 22,087 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 22,090 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 22,096 | -8 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 22,104 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 22,110 | -26 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 22,136 | -26 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 22,162 | -37 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 22,199 | -66 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 22,265 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 22,272 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 22,286 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 22,296 | -10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 22,306 | -30 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 22,336 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 22,350 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (5 June 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 29,905 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 23:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Marco Mori
Opporsi all’Ue è possibile? Per non fare la fine di Bagnai ecco cosa va fatto. https://youtu.be/TTkhUwPa4xU?is=kno_cR7naFwpxIj5
Signed Marco Mori
Venerdì 16 ottobre vi aspetto a Piacenza! Se volete davvero capire quali sono le ricette macroeconomiche per salvare il Paese, non potete mancare! Una medicina contro le bugie dei profeti dell’austerità e delle politiche al servizio della finanza speculativa.
Signed Marco Mori
È stato osservato da alcuni amici che oggi fare deficit significherebbe subire il ricatto dei mercati. Rebus sic stantibus è verissimo. Il debito pubblico è credito privato, ma di chi sia questo credito fa tutta la differenza del mondo. Chi mi conosce sa bene la mia posizione sul punto. Gli speculatori che lucrano sui titoli di Stato (ovvero gli specialisti della lista indicata dal MEF) devono perdere tutto e veder…
Signed Marco Mori
Economia al contrario: “sul debito pubblico il Gen. @RoVannacci sbaglia”. https://youtu.be/4yDkw-ViEbY?is=Cy9om5qhv7K2WYhm
Signed Marco Mori
La Russia non è in crisi, lo siamo noi! Ne abbiamo parlato con Ugo Rossi appena tornato da Mosca https://www.youtube.com/live/eV97pJVddyY?is=Lff_jqqc6OwSfp7s
Signed Marco Mori
La Russia vola, l’Ue affonda: elezioni Duma, Guerra e sanzioni. Ne parliamo in diretta oggi alle 16;30 con Ugo Rossi, appena tornato da Mosca. https://www.youtube.com/live/eV97pJVddyY?is=95NxjngLTZgsmCNe
Signed Marco Mori
Un centro destra speculare al pd e ciò che va annientato. La scelta è tutta loro. Se vogliono tornare alle posizioni di una volta oppure mantenere quelle prone al vincolo esterno di Ue e USA. A FN non serve questo centro destra. La sola differenza è che se ritorneranno al passato saranno ancora della partita e faranno per una volta davvero gli interessi nazionali. Se invece manterranno la linea attuale saranno desti…
Signed Marco Mori
“Siamo tornati indietro” - il mio intervento di oggi su Money https://www.youtube.com/live/s3od7kVCjuw?is=C28264OhHBrIZguz
Signed Marco Mori
A tra pochissimo su Money https://www.youtube.com/live/s3od7kVCjuw?is=9blEOZbg1NrpWHix
Signed Marco Mori
Un piccolo ricordo di quasi dieci anni fa… il mio intervento a Bruxelles: https://youtu.be/mOKfoUafcfc?is=5YTxxc337hMXdDpA La sensazione è di aver fatto come i gamberi… su certi temi siamo tornati indietro e invece devono tornare al centro del dibattito politico. La colpa è di quei partiti, come il cinque stelle allora, che hanno prima promosso, e poi abbandonato, la lotta all’UE.
Signed Marco Mori
La disciplina, il controllo ed il coordinamento dell’economia, anche attraverso nazionalizzazioni dei settori strategici, non è solo una facoltà prevista in Costituzione, ma è un preciso obbligo che incombe sullo Stato per la tutela dell’interesse collettivo. Le basi che i liberisti non capiranno mai… basi dimenticate ormai anche dalla giurisprudenza. #futuronazionale
Signed Marco Mori
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @marcomoriofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@marcomoriofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@marcomoriofficial named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marco Mori” (@marcomoriofficial), 22,041 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marcomoriofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.