Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,019. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,517–52,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 23:06
52,697
+1
3 Nov 2026, 23:09
52,696
-5
2 Nov 2026, 23:24
52,701
+1
1 Nov 2026, 22:55
52,700
+9
31 Oct 2026, 21:00
52,691
-2
30 Oct 2026, 18:20
52,693
+2
29 Oct 2026, 15:07
52,691
-7
28 Oct 2026, 14:27
52,698
-4
27 Oct 2026, 17:11
52,702
-2
26 Oct 2026, 13:28
52,704
-7
25 Oct 2026, 13:48
52,711
+5
24 Oct 2026, 14:55
52,706
-3
23 Oct 2026, 15:47
52,709
+2
22 Oct 2026, 14:20
52,707
-3
21 Oct 2026, 08:46
52,710
-3
20 Oct 2026, 03:06
52,713
-1
19 Oct 2026, 03:26
52,714
-5
18 Oct 2026, 01:58
52,719
-4
16 Oct 2026, 23:29
52,723
+1
15 Oct 2026, 20:29
52,722
first reading
Engagement
286 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 52,697 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,970
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 286 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
286 (29 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
737,520
Reactions total
18,642
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 11:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
15h 41m
Average length
9m 20s
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78,373 reactions across 285 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,502
24.9%
👏
17,599
22.5%
👍
16,525
21.1%
🔥
11,734
15.0%
😱
3,049
3.89%
🙏
2,747
3.51%
⚡
1,337
1.71%
🍾
1,007
1.28%
😢
886
1.13%
🎉
760
0.97%
👌
630
0.804%
💯
627
0.8%
🏆
617
0.787%
😭
429
0.547%
😨
331
0.422%
👀
296
0.378%
💔
120
0.153%
🥰
83
0.106%
❤🔥
42
0.054%
😍
32
0.041%
3 further kinds
20
0.026%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 286 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,742 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 74 posts held from the last 30 days (13.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Il deep state che ha radici profonde a New York, che controlla per mezzo della dem Kathy Hochul, ordina lo stato di emergenza a causa del morbillo
Da verificare le cause reali della dipartita di questo bambino. Ma se al contrario vi sono decessi o eventi avversi post-iniezione sieri tossici, in questo caso non si leggono mai notizie sul main stream. Chissà perché.
I numeri delle vaccinazioni sono in picchiata in tu…
Ho avuto l'onore di conoscere personalmente il Dottor Francesco Oliviero, e sia Franco Giovannini che io, ci stringiamo attorno alla famiglia in questo momento di estremo dolore.
I documenti che Pfizer ha cercato di nascondere per 75 anni vi faranno gelare il sangue nelle vene
270 donne incinte sono state vaccinate nell'ambito dello studio di Pfizer. 234 di queste cartelle cliniche relative alla gravidanza sono completamente SPARITE.
Questo è un INSABBIAMENTO. Delle 36 donne che sono state effettivamente monitorate, oltre l'80% HA PERSO I PROPRI BAMBINI, e Pfizer lo sapeva.
Pfizer e i suoi…
Se la proteina spike non esiste, tutti i protocolli venduti dai tanti medici "antivax" sono frodi, o comunque non servono a nulla.
Non che abbia troppe repulsioni morali a tirare una fregatura ai vaccinati, ma in questo caso mi sembra deprecabile.
🚨 Acquista qui i miei libri.
➡️ Canale di ricette cheto e low carb: t.me/ricettecheto
➡️ Un nutrizionista italiano in Australia: t.me/italiaaustralia
E visto che oggi sto arruffando un po' di penne, torniamo su un punto che molti trascurano: non solo non esiste il virus del covid, ma non esiste neppure la proteina spike.
Come spiega correttamente una persona che ritengo molto intelligente, oltre che scientificamente incredibilmente dotato, La presunta "proteina spike" è solo un artefatto ottenoto grazir all'aggiunta di un enzima che scinde le proteine a un piatti…
👏50👍22❤10🙏9🔥2😱1
Signed Grazia Piccinelli
Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @comitatofortitudo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@comitatofortitudo edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @comitatofortitudo as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
METODO DI BELLA @METODO_DI_BELLA · 20,638 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
Roberto Nuzzo 🇮🇹👮♂️ @robertonuzzocanale · 21,145 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026
𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 @AndreaTosattoOfficial · 23,373 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
ALI - Avvocati Liberi @avvocati_liberi · 21,327 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
RA/Avv. DDr. Renate Holzeisen @renateholzeisen · 33,580 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
IL GRANDE RISVEGLIO @Unisciti_a_IGR · 19,430 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
IL RISVEGLIO DELLA FENICE @ilrisvegliodellafenice · 22,074 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
IppocrateOrg @IppocrateOrg · 34,222 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗢 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗢 @consenso_disinformato · 54,337 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Eventi Avversi News @evncov · 52,415 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Andrea Colombini Official Channel @andreacolombini · 82,697 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Matteo Gracis @matteogracis · 143,933 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Dr. Roberto Petrella 3317784249 @RobertoPetrella · 21,480 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 September 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale @RaffaellaRegoli · 47,002 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Protocolli CDS @protocolliCDS · 42,708 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Danni Collaterali @dannicollateralivaccinocovid · 28,478 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
La nuova normalità @lanuovanormalita · 34,426 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Avv. Mauro Sandri @Avv_Mauro_Sandri_MODULI · 48,045 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,435 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗭𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗘.𝗜𝗧 - Marcello Pamio @marcellopamio · 69,713 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
BECCIOLINI NETWORK Informazione libera @canaleFAHRENHEIT912 · 21,953 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi e ci Fa Incazzare @Laveritacirendeliberiecifaincazz · 27,414 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
La Voce Libera 🗣️🔈 @la_voce_libera · 26,544 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
In Telegram Veritas @In_Telegram_Veritas · 33,690 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Canale Comitato Fortitudo” (@comitatofortitudo), 52,697 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comitatofortitudo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.