Rutte 🇺🇦 ➡️i tedeschi possono votare per l’AfD, i francesi possono votare per Le Pen, non farà differenza. La politica della NATO verso la Russia continuerà comunque. ⚖️
🔥49🤬41🤯7😱7😍2

Channel
@avvocati_liberi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,322subscribers
+192 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001558746812 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avvocati_liberi |
| Description | ALI è una associazione di giuristi che fa della difesa delle Libertà la propria missione. Liberi per nascita, Liberi per scelta, Liberi per diritto, Liberi per rispetto, Liberi per vocazione, Liberi per il Popolo, Liberi per la Nazione. |
| Created | 1 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avvocati_liberi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 21,322 | +14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 21,308 | +24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 21,284 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 21,255 | +119 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 21,136 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 21,145 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 21,149 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 21,151 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:49 | 21,157 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 21,158 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 21,159 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 21,161 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 21,165 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 21,167 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 21,169 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 21,165 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:09 | 21,158 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 21,148 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 21,138 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 21,133 | first reading |
89 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 89 (26 July 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 131,063 |
| Reactions total | 3,312 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,889 reactions across 87 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 3,050 | 30.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,933 | 19.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,507 | 15.2% | |
| 🤬 | 1,375 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,070 | 10.8% | |
| 🙏 | 395 | 3.99% | |
| ⚡ | 189 | 1.91% | |
| 😢 | 167 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 88 | 0.89% | |
| 😱 | 81 | 0.819% | |
| 😍 | 34 | 0.344% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rutte 🇺🇦 ➡️i tedeschi possono votare per l’AfD, i francesi possono votare per Le Pen, non farà differenza. La politica della NATO verso la Russia continuerà comunque. ⚖️
🔥49🤬41🤯7😱7😍2
🖌https://t.me/RaffaellaRegoli
❤31😢24🤬7⚡3
“Israele non appartiene più alla comunità civile delle nazioni” - così il Primo Ministro malese Anwar Ibrahim via @lantidiplomatico ⚖️
👏116❤12🔥7🙏4👍1
#buonadomenica
👍8🙏3❤2
Avvocati Liberi si stringe al dolore del socio onorario ALI Prof. Avv. Augusto Sinagra per il gravissimo lutto che ha colpito la sua famiglia. Per questo manterremo 2 giorni di rispettoso silenzio 💔☦️🌺 ⚖️
🙏161❤54😢29👍5
come ammesso al senatore interrogante, per la vaccinazione dei propri lavoratori la Pfizer ha consegnato LOTTI SPECIALI di iniezioni di Covid19 che non erano state sottoposte ai controlli TGA* e diversi dai lotti pubblici. Perché? Erano mica placebo? * La TGA è lo strumento più efficace per verificare la stabilità termica di un nuovo farmaco o per garantire che l'umidità residua e i solventi siano entro limiti acce…
🤬49🔥17👏7⚡3❤2
#Goodnews FONTE Con decisione pronunciata il 18 settembre 2026, il Tribunale di Firenze, ha riconosciuto ad un'anziana donna vaccinata un “danno permanente e irreversibile alla salute” riconducibile alle due vaccinazioni anti-Covid-19 Pfizer/BioNTech somministrate il 14 aprile e il 5 maggio 2021 e ha condannato il ministero della Salute a corrisponderle l'indennizzo di mille euro bimestrali. Come nel caso del giudi…
👍65❤23🙏12🔥7
❗️❗️🤩 Il 3 dicembre 2020 il pediatra Dr. Paul Norman Thomas ha perso la sua licenza medica per aver pubblicato uno studio su 3324 bambini che dimostra che quelli non vaccinati erano molto più sani dei bambini vaccinati. L'abstract dello studio riporta: "I nostri risultati danno credito agli appelli a condurre ricerche indipendenti da qualsiasi fonte di finanziamento legata all'industria dei vaccini. Sebbene i bassi…
🤬69❤19🙏12🔥7👏3
🚨🤒 Si segnala che ieri è entrato in vigore il nuovo tariffario nazionale approvato dalla Conferenza Stato-Regioni il 23 luglio 2026 relativo al ticket per una parte delle prestazioni erogate dal Servizio sanitario nazionale. La revisione interessa 448 prestazioni di specialistica ambulatoriale e 222 codici dell’assistenza protesica, che comprendono visite mediche, esami diagnostici, procedure ambulatoriali e disposi…
🤬61🔥54👏16⚡2❤2
Efficacia ed effettività dei vaccini anti-COVID-19: l'elefante (non) nella stanza. A completamento e in relazione al post precedente con l'audizione in Commissione Covid-19 del Prof. Cheli potete trovare qui 😘 https://www.avvocatiliberi.legal/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Olliaro-IERV_0_2067531.pdf ➡️lo studio scientifico su cui si ha basato le sue conclusioni. Si tratta del celebre e dibattuto contributo del Prof. Pi…
🙏18❤13👍7🔥4👏2
#losapevamo del giorno. video alla fine del post 🎬 Nel corso dell'audizione (08/09/2026) davanti alla Commissione parlamentare d'inchiesta Covid19, il Prof. di Statistica economica Bruno Cheli, smonta i dati comunicati dalle autorità sanitarie sul vaccino Pfizer: "Aveva un'efficacia dello 0,84%, non del 95% com'è stato detto. Le stime sui sieri salva-vita sono state irrealisticamente alte". Il riferimento è al da…
👏71🤬17❤10👍9🔥7
Relazione tecnico-investigativa sull’acquisto, autorizzazione, distribuzione, somministrazione e farmacovigilanza del medicinale Comirnaty BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech. Sul sito di OSA POLIZIA la Relazione in download gratuito ⬇️ https://osapolizia.com/relazione-tecnico-investigativa-sullacquisto-autorizzazione-distribuzione/
👍34👏16❤10🙏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @avvocati_liberi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@avvocati_liberi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALI - Avvocati Liberi” (@avvocati_liberi), 21,322 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avvocati_liberi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.