“A meno che non pensano che posso rischiare di fare la fine di Regeni” Tranquilli! Ranucci sta verificando la fonte di questa pesantissima dichiarazione.

Channel
Francesca Totolo (Unico canale)
@fratotolo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,527subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001327462805 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fratotolo |
| Created | 23 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fratotolo |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 9,527 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 9,532 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 9,530 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 9,528 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 9,536 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 9,538 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 9,539 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 9,534 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 9,540 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 9,545 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 9,549 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 9,547 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 9,547 | first reading |
Engagement
315 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,527 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,320
- 74 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.05%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 74
- of 315 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 315 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97,330 |
| Reactions total | 6,862 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 53m 45s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,309 reactions across 314 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 7,438 | 24.5% | |
| 🤡 | 3,875 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 2,533 | 8.36% | |
| 🤬 | 2,526 | 8.33% | |
| 🤮 | 2,203 | 7.27% | |
| 🔥 | 2,131 | 7.03% | |
| 🤣 | 2,116 | 6.98% | |
| 👍 | 1,401 | 4.62% | |
| 😁 | 1,218 | 4.02% | |
| 🖕 | 1,127 | 3.72% | |
| 🍌 | 835 | 2.75% | |
| 😡 | 476 | 1.57% | |
| ❤ | 404 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 305 | 1.01% | |
| 🍾 | 197 | 0.65% | |
| 🙈 | 157 | 0.518% | |
| 💊 | 130 | 0.429% | |
| 🤷♀ | 115 | 0.379% | |
| 🎉 | 108 | 0.356% | |
| 🌚 | 100 | 0.33% | |
| 40 further kinds | 914 | 3.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 314 of the 315 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 315 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video esemplificativo del rapporto tra welfare dei Paesi europei e immigrazione di massa. https://x.com/fratotolo2/status/2093572827240685636?s=46&t=sUk3EBNDr9ql-jZZIx0CEA
🌚1🤮1
Ranucci rimosso dalla conduzione di Report, don Biancalani dalla parrocchia di Vicofaro: vedo già smaniare il dinamico duo di talent scout Fratoianni-Bonelli. Volendo, ci sarebbe pure Tavares latitante in Camerun.
💩40😁33🤡4⚡2😡1
Il vero obiettivo sono i risparmi delle famiglie: la von der Leyen lo afferma chiaramente. https://x.com/fratotolo2/status/2093402771558957215?s=46&t=sUk3EBNDr9ql-jZZIx0CEA
💩50🖕23🔥8💊3⚡2
Sui suoi canali social, Giulia Presutti sta già subendo la gogna dei fan dell’apostolo Ranucci.
🤬34💩15🔥2🤣2❤1🍾1
“Due persone che mortificano le professionalità che per 30 anni hanno fatto la storia di Report e del servizio pubblico” 👉 Sarà contenta Giulia Presutti, già inviata di Report 👉 Dalla lettera di san Ranucci apostolo: “Non avrai altra ‘libertà di stampa’ all'infuori di me”
💩36🤡17🤣12🖕8😡5❤1
INVIATI DI REPORT: PROPOSTA IRRICEVIBILE, PRONTI AD ANDARCENE “La decisione assunta dalla Rai è per noi completamente irricevibile. È inaccettabile per il metodo, dal momento che l’azienda ha rifiutato qualsiasi interlocuzione con la squadra in queste settimane facendoci apprendere la scelta dalle agenzie, e nel merito, dal momento che le figure scelte non sono in alcun modo rappresentative della storia e dei valori…
🍾70😁14🤣9👏8🤡5❤2
Fuori Ranucci: alla conduzione di Report, Giulia Presutti e Daniele Piervincenzi, la prima già inviata del programma. “La Rai ritiene che il valore del giornalismo d’inchiesta, da sempre elemento distintivo dell’offerta informativa del Servizio pubblico, risieda nella credibilità e nell’autorevolezza che solo una piena indipendenza editoriale e un’imparzialità rigorosa possono assicurare”
🤣56👍7😁6🤮3🍌2👏1😡1
“La libertà delle donne non può essere una condizione per concedere la libertà religiosa” Rhitu Miah, bengalese con cittadinanza italiana e candidata al Consiglio comunale di Venezia nelle fila del PD.
🖕54🤡29💩17💊9⚡4🍌4👎1👏1
Dopo 18 giorni dall’arresto del reo confesso Lavitola, Ranucci pubblica il video dell’attentato subito. Si sarà finalmente scagliato contro l’amico? No! Contro tutto e tutti ma non contro Lavitola.
🤡58🤣15🖕3😡3🔥1
Qui è quando Bonaccini sosteneva la narrazione “senza immigrati, chi raccoglie i pomodori?” Un elettore di destra, povero bifolco e ignorante, non avrebbe mai sostenuto una tesi così poco “inclusiva”.
🤡57💩35🖕19🔥9🤬5⚡2😁1😡1
Le mie ricerche costano tanto impegno e tempo. In alcune circostanze, pure denaro per difendermi da querele temerarie. Tutte le notizie pubblicate vengono prima attentamente verificate. L’obiettivo è rappresentare ciò che veramente sta succedendo in Italia e nel resto d’Europa a causa dell’immigrazione di massa, una verità nascosta dai media per non dover ammettere il fallimento della società multiculturale. Per …
❤28👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 315 posts we hold for @fratotolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@guerrieriperlaliberta · 45,6819 postsGPEDI
@GPEDI · 9765 postsGianpiero
@GianpieroCelano1970 · 703 postsGIORGIO RICCARDINI QUANTISTICO
@NOALLO · 9,8543 postsPensa&Scrivi
@Pensa_Scrivi · 1,0053 postsNegri Islamici e Maranza
@NegriIslamiciMaranza · 152 postsSa Defenza Channel
@Sadefenza · 13,3022 postsPIERO PIERO
@canalepieropiero · 1,0982 postsCasaPound Napoli - Sezione Berta UFFICIALE
@casapoundnapoliufficiale · 7482 postsIl 𝗙𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼
@exfrittomisto · 20,2012 postsARSENALE K CHANNEL - Circolo Ricreativo delle Bestie di Satira
@ArsenaleKappa · 21,2471 postCoprifuoco Live 🎙
@CoprifuocoLive · 14,6231 postFact Checker Indipendenti
@FactCheckerIndipendenti · 661 postMa in Toscana siamo avanti...
@InToskanaSiamoAvanti · 241 postNeuroni Funzionanti canale
@NeuroniFunzionanti · 3,3731 postCOLIBRÌ DELLA LUCE! ☺️
@colibridellaluce · 1,8021 postFisica Quantistica e Conoscenze al Confine
@conoscenzealconfine · 12,4801 post🏛 Figli di Romolo 🏛
@identitaeuropeaI · 1,0851 postMonferrato Non Conforme
@monferratononconforme · 7001 postRADIOGREG.info - SOLO PER LO 0.3% ☄☄☄
@radiogreginfo · 22,1261 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drbarbarabalanzoni · 70,059
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
@weltanschauungitaliaofficial · 23,965
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
@In_Telegram_Veritas · 33,898
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@Avv_Mauro_Sandri_MODULI · 48,480
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@evncov · 53,122
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@notizieitaliane24 · 104,546
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
@PaoloBellavite · 31,430
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@protocolliCDS · 42,240
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
@renateholzeisen · 33,790
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@nicolaporroufficiale · 30,574
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@RaffaellaRegoli · 47,265
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@cesaresacchetti · 61,680
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@databaseitalia · 38,978
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
@RossellaFidanza · 29,248
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@ilrisvegliodellafenice · 22,078
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
@comitatofortitudo · 52,492
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
@lanuovanormalita · 34,829
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
@drcristinatomasi · 28,280
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
@guerrieriperlaliberta · 45,681
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
@estero24hnews · 25,089
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@ByobluOfficial · 85,087
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@la_voce_libera · 26,794
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
@MatBrandi · 23,292
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
@militaresemplice · 32,354
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francesca Totolo (Unico canale)” (@fratotolo), 9,527 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fratotolo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.