28 measurements spanning 32 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,177–39,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 15:58
39,286
+22
4 Sept 2026, 18:55
39,264
-2
3 Sept 2026, 01:06
39,266
+8
2 Sept 2026, 02:11
39,258
+13
1 Sept 2026, 00:48
39,245
+2
31 Aug 2026, 03:36
39,243
+22
30 Aug 2026, 06:29
39,221
+17
29 Aug 2026, 05:16
39,204
-5
28 Aug 2026, 06:13
39,209
-7
27 Aug 2026, 05:34
39,216
+3
26 Aug 2026, 03:34
39,213
+5
25 Aug 2026, 00:04
39,208
-3
23 Aug 2026, 08:08
39,211
+4
21 Aug 2026, 18:38
39,207
+3
19 Aug 2026, 11:27
39,204
-11
18 Aug 2026, 14:24
39,215
-13
17 Aug 2026, 17:28
39,228
-6
16 Aug 2026, 15:54
39,234
+8
14 Aug 2026, 20:28
39,226
-6
13 Aug 2026, 11:16
39,232
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 39,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
96 (30 July 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
683,550
Reactions total
9,993
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,500
Videos
≈4,290
Links
≈4,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13h 26m
Average length
11m 03s
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,084 reactions across 92 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,993
49.7%
👍
2,423
17.2%
👏
1,437
10.2%
🔥
892
6.33%
🙏
658
4.67%
🤣
495
3.51%
💯
466
3.31%
❤🔥
282
2.00%
🥰
240
1.70%
😁
198
1.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 96 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Awake432hz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Non esiste la casualità, né il caso.
Non esistono. Assolutamente. Ogni cosa ha una causa. Il fatto è che, molte volte, non conosciamo le cause e attribuiamo ciò che accade al caso.
Einstein, pensi un po’, sa cosa diceva? Diceva: "Il caso è il modo in cui Dio parla nell’anonimato."
Se le raccontassi tutto ciò che è accaduto perché io potessi sposare la persona che amo più di ogni altra… direbbe: «Non può essere».
Son…
INTERVISTA CON BRIAN WEISS (TG2)
Il celebre psichiatra, autore di libri sulle ipnosi regressive che testimoniano l’esistenza dell’aldilà e della reincarnazione, dopo una vita dedicata alla raccolta di testimonianze ed esperienze dirette dei suoi pazienti.
Lo sai che puoi caricare la tua acqua con la frequenza del sole?
In commercio trovi acqua morta nella plastica che rilascia sostanze chimiche tossiche per il tuo corpo.
L’acqua solarizzata in vetro blu agisce invece come un software di pulizia che cancella memorie tossiche e ristruttura le molecole del tuo organismo.
Sintonizza la tua idratazione e scarica l’energia del blu cobalto con il Sistema FonteViva di Kija…
Cosa accadrebbe se internet smettesse di funzionare?
👍55🔥27❤16🙏14
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @Awake432hz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Awake432hz edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Codice Genesi @httpR2aVkMTA0 · 29,797 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 8 September 2026
Dott. GABRIELE PRINZI - il sistema immunitario è argomento da complottisti😎 @dottgabrieleprinzi_official · 29,483 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Sir Red Ronnie @RedRonnieTv · 32,969 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
Silver Nervuti @silvernervuti · 42,506 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Matteo Gracis @matteogracis · 139,309 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo @comitatofortitudo · 52,277 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
ZAINZ 🐺 Canale Ufficiale ZainzTv @zainztv · 51,703 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
Raffaella Regoli canale ufficiale @RaffaellaRegoli · 47,297 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Eventi Avversi News @evncov · 53,275 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
In Telegram Veritas @In_Telegram_Veritas · 33,948 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
DataBase Italia @databaseitalia · 39,025 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Andrea Colombini Official Channel @andreacolombini · 83,044 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
100 Giorni da Leoni @centogiornidaleoni · 88,496 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Awake432Hz C.C.” (@Awake432hz), 39,286 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Awake432hz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
