Channel
@ilduc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,148subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001270011859 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilduc |
| Created | 19 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilduc |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 2,148 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 2,146 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 2,140 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 2,136 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 2,135 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 2,131 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 2,127 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 2,122 | -32 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 2,154 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 2,155 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 2,148 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 2,140 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 2,133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 2,133 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
633 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 271 | 42.8% | |
| 👏 | 203 | 32.1% | |
| 👍 | 75 | 11.8% | |
| 🤮 | 51 | 8.06% | |
| 🤡 | 29 | 4.58% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 0.632% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ho sentito una tesi complottista interessante che vorrei dibattere : le scie chimiche fanno crollare la produzione del fotovoltaico, lo fanno anche per quello! L'Italia non è un grosso produttore di energia elettrica, se c'è una cosa che i gestori amano è proprio che ti fai la corrente e non la consumi ma paghi tutti i costi fissi. Se è vero che ci guadagnano di meno, è vero anche che non devono investire per aument…
😁6
Chissà che ne pensa Burioni? Il Maresciallo.
👏16😁12👍4
Perché? Che sta succedendo? Riassume il Duca. Fauci si appella al quinto emendamento 100 e più volte ma non può, perché è stato graziato. Cosa dice il quinto emendamento? Dice che non sei costretto a rispondere a una domanda se rispondendo ti auto accusi di un reato. Praticamente non vuol confessare.
👍16🤡9🤮5
Video, posted without a caption
😁31👍6
Non puoi essere di sinistra se hai un cervello
😁28👏4
Non ho avuto tempo di mettere il logo
😁28
Photo, posted without a caption
😁25👏5
Questa tizia col naso particolare, è da un pô a capo della Blizzard una delle più importanti società di videogiochi del mondo. Ora sta tizia che pare la madre cogliona dell’amico più coglione che uno ha e che sui videogiochi ragiona proprio come la madre cogliona dell’amico coglione ha recentemente detto:”Cavolo vorrei che non avessimo chiamato il nostro gioco di punta WARcraft, suona così intimidatorio” Questo perch…
👏35😁3
Stamattina passo in cartoleria a ritirare un pacco mentre aspetto mi cade l’occhio su questo simpatico orsetto che scopro essere un grazioso temperamatite. Ah la matita va infilata nel Culetto dell’orsetto….. Il Maresciallo.
😁27
Faccio un post che non c’entra un cazzo con quelli che faccio di solito, la foto l’ho fatta io stamattina, volevo capire se secondo voi questi del supermercato si sono semplicemente sbagliati o è una presa per il culo? Il Maresciallo.
😁34🤡11
Photo, posted without a caption
😁10👍7🤡6
Facciamo un recap della crisi di Ceuta che ha messo a nudo una realtà che molti continuano ostinatamente a negare: i flussi migratori di massa non sono sempre fenomeni spontanei, casuali o inevitabili. Quando decine di migliaia di persone si riversano improvvisamente su un unico confine, è difficile credere che sia tutto frutto del caso. È il segnale che l’immigrazione può diventare uno strumento di pressione geopo…
👏16👍13
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ilduc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IL DUCA” (@ilduc), 2,148 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilduc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.