Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Il Veritiero

Channel

Il Veritiero

@IlVeritiero

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,336subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001456727884
TypeChannel
Username@IlVeritiero
Created8 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IlVeritiero

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,3368,3778,356.56 August 2026 — 8,376 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,376 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,377 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,369 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,362 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,356 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,353 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,351 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,349 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,340 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,341 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,336 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,330–8,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:558,336-5
14 Sept 2026, 09:158,341+1
10 Sept 2026, 08:378,340-9
5 Sept 2026, 06:168,349-2
29 Aug 2026, 12:038,351-2
26 Aug 2026, 13:428,353-3
19 Aug 2026, 19:428,356-6
16 Aug 2026, 18:548,362-7
10 Aug 2026, 15:268,369-8
7 Aug 2026, 06:018,377+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,376no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:538,376first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 8,336 subscribers
Avg views / post
863
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held96 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total16,395
Reactions total374
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 03s
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,901 reactions across 93 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍89847.2%
26714.0%
👌20410.7%
😡934.89%
👏643.37%
🤨613.21%
🤩462.42%
👀382.00%
🤬382.00%
😈271.42%
🙉231.21%
🔥180.947%
❤‍🔥170.894%
🏆160.842%
🕊160.842%
😱140.736%
🎃110.579%
💊70.368%
😍60.316%
🆒50.263%
11 further kinds321.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,901 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Il coinvolgimento operativo britannico nella guerra contro la Russia https://www.cese-m.eu/2026/08/il-coinvolgimento-operativo-britannico-nella-guerra-contro-la-russia/?fbclid=IwVERDUAT-onNwZG9mBWV4dG4DYWVtAjEwAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHhQFFN3SF8aaQT1dHUxN9IVexZv3zCexfThe_G3PAauHJCwYHoLhCq6joszA_aem_0iNnAU2Sh0NG53B-n5TyQA

👍2

28 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC646 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026

L’Oceano Artico sarà libero dai ghiacci entro l’anno 2000? (The Tuscaloosa News – 13 maggio 1972) Il Polo Nord potrebbe essere libero dai ghiacci nel 2008 (ABC NEWS) Tutto il ghiaccio artico potrebbe scomparire entro il 2012? (Star-News) Le estati artiche libere dai ghiacci «entro il 2013» (NEWS / BBC News) La Marina degli Stati Uniti prevede un Artico libero dai ghiacci in estate entro il 2016 L’anno prossimo o

👏25👍7🏆1

27 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC731 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026

I contributi di altri parametri ottici degli aerosol (asimmetria AP e single scattering albedo SSA), del vapore acqueo e dell’ozono risultano piccoli o insignificanti sull’intero periodo. L’importanza relativa dei driver varia nel tempo, negli anni 1980 e 1990: le riduzioni di AOD sono il driver principale del GDB (soprattutto nelle aree più inquinate), seguite dalle variazioni di CA di livello alto. Negli anni 1990

👍152

27 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC639 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Uno studio recente e sottoposto a revisione paritaria del 2025, rileva che la radiazione solare globale superficiale è aumentata di +0,88 W/m² per decennio dal 1984 al 2018... circa +3 W/m² di illuminazione. Superficie terrestre: +2,57 W/m² per decennio. I fattori principali? Nuvole e aerosol... non CO₂. Dimostrando che ridurre le emissioni di CO₂ non fa nulla per invertire direttamente questo aumento osservato da a

4

27 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC618 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Nuovo appuntamento con Kosmic Explorer - Storia tradizioni, attualità: Politica eggregorica La storia dei movimenti e dei partiti politici viene spesso spiegata in base ai soli fattori economici, sociali e ideologici. Ma sorgono diverse domande a questo proposto. Se nascono anche in base a fattori socioeconomici e ideologici, ai quale si aggiunge l’aspetto psicologico, come mai succede che certi partiti sopravvivan

👍145👌1

27 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC671 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Parole piuttosto impressionanti di Lawrence Wilkerson, colonnello in pensione dell’esercito americano ed ex capo di gabinetto di Colin Powell quando era Segretario di Stato. Wilkerson sostiene che per decenni gli Stati Uniti abbiano lavorato sistematicamente per plasmare la politica europea attraverso CIA e altri servizi di intelligence. Usa parole difficili da equivocare: «Abbiamo comprato direttori di giornali, le

👍243

26 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC811 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Negli ultimi anni il Fanar ha sviluppato un nuovo concetto ecclesiologico secondo il quale il Patriarca di Costantinopoli non è più semplicemente “primo tra pari”, ma “primo senza pari” (primus sine paribus), attribuendogli così poteri che non trovano fondamento nella tradizione canonica ortodossa. A titolo di esempio, ha citato le pretese del Fanar di concedere unilateralmente l’autocefalia e il diritto di giudicare

👍13🤨1🤬1

26 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC839 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @LauraRuHK

Mentre commentatori da divano e giornalisti si dilungano con mappe, grafici e ipotesi fantasiose sulla visita a Mosca del direttore della CIA John Ratcliffe, la verità è una sola: nessuno di loro conosce né il motivo, né i temi dei colloqui, né l’identità degli interlocutori. Eppure, imperterriti, continuano a riempire ore di diretta aggrappandosi a “fonti vicine a”, “analisti geostrategici” e, perché no, anche all’o

29👍6🐳1

25 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,160 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🇺🇸🇷🇺 Il direttore della CIA John Ratcliffe è arrivato a Mosca per discutere dei “piani di mobilitazione russi e di un possibile attacco ai paesi europei”, secondo quanto riporta il Wall Street Journal Secondo il quotidiano, gli Stati Uniti hanno raccolto informazioni di intelligence che indicano i primi preparativi russi per una possibile mobilitazione militare e piani volti a mettere alla prova la determinazione de

👍15👀82😡1🙈1

25 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC919 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://lenuoveviedelmondo.com/blog-detail/post/627610/con-noi-o-contro-di-noi-lultima-carta-usa?fbclid=IwdGRjcAT6g_BjbGNrBPqD73Bkb2YFZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEeu-c4umo5uA6rLcdBXdjxmIR15uHBF_rpcaMT4iYT7V4ZXntNHMkJek63ZQ8_aem_IIHVqv3luUwoub1x08ximw

🤬11👍6

25 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,060 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

⚠️ Ex scienziato del CDC, i cui studi erano stati usati per "smentire" il legame tra vaccini e autismo, si dichiarerà colpevole Poul Thorsen, 65 anni, sta finalizzando un patteggiamento con i pubblici ministeri in relazione alle accuse derivanti da un'incriminazione federale del 2011 per frode telematica e riciclaggio di denaro. La ricerca di Thorsen è stata utilizzata per respingere oltre 5.000 richieste di risarci

👍223💯2😡2

24 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://lenuoveviedelmondo.com/blog-detail/post/627507/la-parabola-di-evergrande?fbclid=IwY2xjawT5WmdwZG9mBWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR6IHCiQsd3VfplUMd8Kb1NJBKmi8lz3VCP2QiBAR61KTmdriXsqnaWO97ehhw_aem_TXPC4Pf2-QDh1er9HHv7jA

👍11👌2🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @IlVeritiero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Weltanschauung Italia
@weltanschauungitaliaofficial · 23,965
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
In Telegram Veritas
@In_Telegram_Veritas · 33,898
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Cesare Sacchetti
@cesaresacchetti · 61,680
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr. Cristina Tomasi
@drcristinatomasi · 28,280
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
LA VERITÀ RENDE LIBERI
@Giovanni832 · 26,103
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
The Border 2.0 Genisys
@bordernights · 23,738
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Michele Giovagnoli (canale ufficiale)
@michelegiovagnoli · 37,418
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
CORVELVA
@corvelva1993 · 37,257
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
DataBase Italia
@databaseitalia · 38,978
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Border Nights (ufficiale)
@BorderNightsOfficial · 27,060
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
Coordinamento 15 ottobre
@Coordinamento_15_ottobre · 25,862
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔 𝗧𝗢𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟
@AndreaTosattoOfficial · 23,617
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗭𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗘.𝗜𝗧 - Marcello Pamio
@marcellopamio · 70,003
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
La Voce Libera 🗣️🔈
@la_voce_libera · 26,794
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
100 Giorni da Leoni
@centogiornidaleoni · 88,303
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Danni Collaterali
@dannicollateralivaccinocovid · 28,877
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
Eventi Avversi News
@evncov · 53,122
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Rossella Fidanza
@RossellaFidanza · 29,248
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Il Veritiero” (@IlVeritiero), 8,336 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IlVeritiero.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.