16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +1,630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,927–16,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 01:56
16,068
+898
20 Aug 2026, 16:43
15,170
+964
19 Aug 2026, 18:05
14,206
-35
18 Aug 2026, 14:35
14,241
-14
17 Aug 2026, 12:25
14,255
-19
16 Aug 2026, 03:17
14,274
-26
14 Aug 2026, 15:27
14,300
-22
13 Aug 2026, 04:14
14,322
-23
12 Aug 2026, 04:54
14,345
-22
11 Aug 2026, 03:38
14,367
-16
10 Aug 2026, 05:40
14,383
-16
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
14,399
-17
8 Aug 2026, 04:18
14,416
-20
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
14,436
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:15
14,438
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:03
14,438
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 16,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,330
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
52 (31 July 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
173,010
Reactions total
3,572
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈326
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,572 reactions across 52 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,095
30.7%
👍
771
21.6%
😁
517
14.5%
😐
310
8.68%
🤬
300
8.40%
😢
282
7.89%
👏
107
3.00%
🤔
74
2.07%
🔥
46
1.29%
👎
43
1.20%
🎉
17
0.476%
🥰
10
0.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,572reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 52 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @exdigy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
تا وقتی که تکلیف کیفیت #بنزین مشخص نشده نکات رو رعایت کنید
دور موتور رو بالای ۳۰۰۰ نبرید
درجا و یا پشت چراغ قرمز های طولانی در ساعات گرم، کولر نگیرید
سطح روغن و مایع خنک کننده رو هر هفته کنترل کنید
۵۰۰۰ کیلومتر روغن رو تعویض کنید و اگه ماشین شهری هست و ترافیک دارید رو ۴۰۰۰
از کورس گذاشتن به شدت پرهیز کنید
اگه ماشین در مسیر سربالایی ناک زد، گاز رو شل کنید و بعد به آرومی گاز بدید
موتورهای زیر ۱۵۰۰ بیشتر رعایت کنن…
#طرح_سقاب برای بنزین و بیعرضگی دولت؛ طرحی با ریسک آشوب اجتماعی است.
بر اساس #گزارش_محرمانه دولت علت اصلی مصرف بالای بنزین:
خودروهای بیکیفیت: ۵۶.۷ درصد
۲۸ درصد قاچاق یا صادرات
و ارزانی قیمت بنزین؛ فقط ۷.۳ درصد است.
یعنی در گزارش خود دولت، “خودروهای بیکیفیت” نزدیک به ۸ برابر “ارزانی بنزین” بهعنوان مهمترین علت مصرف بالا مطرح شدهاند.
چرا از نظر دولت سادهترین نسخه، دستبردن به قیمت بنزین و جیب مردم اس…
اما تحلیل میان مدت بیتکوین. من به نظرم کف این روند دیده نشده و احتمالا این ریزش که کف روند در اون دیده بشه تا دو سه ماه آینده این ریزش تکمیل بشه. کف این روند انتظار میره جایی بین 40 تا 50 هزار دلار باشه. اما الآن در برابر قیمت محدودههای عرضهی 73-74، 77-78 و 80-82 هستش. در هر کدام از این محدودهها باید چک بشه نشانههای ضعف روند که کدوم محدوده میتونه محدودهی مناسبی برای این پوزیشن شورت محتمل باشه. محدودهی حوالی 7…
دولت به مدیرانخودرو طی پنج سال ۶ میلیارد دلار پول داده تا بره از شرکت چری که کل ارزشش ۷ میلیارد دلاره خودرو وارد کنه.
ضمنا قیمت خرید خودروها رو مدیرانخودرو به صورت خود اظهاری با اختلاف بسیار زیادتر از قیمتی که واقعا داره به دولت اعلام میکرده و حالشو میبرده.
@Exdigy
خلاصه اجلاس #کریپتو در کاخ سفید:
ترامپ گفت #آمریکا داره جدی به خرید حجم زیادی #بیتکوین و بقیه کریپتوها فکر میکنه!
ترامپ از کنگره خواست قانون Clarity رو هرچه زودتر تصویب کنه!
ترامپ میگه آمریکا باید بدون رقیب، رهبر بیتکوین و کریپتو بمونه!
هایپرلیکوئید ( $HYPE) بعد از حرف ترامپ که CFTC داره میاره تو آمریکا، ۱۵٪ پامپ کرد و رفت ۶۹ دلار !
رئیس SEC هم گفت: بزرگترین پیشرفتهای تکنولوژی باید همینجا تو آمریکا رقم …
کلا حرفهای همتی رو اگر بذاریم کنار قطع کامل رابطهی مالی امارات با ایران(بخش زیادی از واردات ایران و مراودات مالی و دور زدن تحریم در امارات بوده) و شروع فاز جدید جنگ اقتصادی و بالا رفتن قیمت بنزین پاییز و زمستون به مراتب سخت و سختتری در پیشه و احتمال یک 98، 401 و 404 دیگه کم نیستش.
چیزی که من متوجه شدم بالا رفتن قیمت بنزین قطعیه و اگر تا امروز بالا نبردن از ترس اعتراض مردم بوده. بخشی از بنزین مصرفی کشور چندین ساله ک…
دیشب عبدالناصر همتی مصاحبه تلوزیونی داشت و در اونجا حرفهایی مهمی گفتش. اول از همه گفت که اون 12 میلیارد دلار که قرار بود با توافق آزاد بشه؛ آزاد نشدند. بعدش هم گفت که هیچ صادرات نفتی نداریم ما. بعد گفت که تامین مالیمون از مالیات امسال کم شده و باید به تامین اجتماعی کمک کنیم چون تامین اجتماعی نیاز داره. (پ.ن: دولت اوراق هم میخواست بفروشه که خیلی موفق نبود در فروش اوراق امسال. کلا بودجهی ایران از نفت، مالیات و اوراق ع…
ترامپ در تروث سوشال نوشت:
هیچکس به جمهوری اسلامی ایران فرصت بزرگتری برای بستن یک معامله نداده است بهاندازه من. متأسفانه، آنها نتوانستند از این فرصت استفاده کنند. بنابراین، امروز اعلام میکنم که شدیدترین عملیات اقتصادی که تاکنون علیه هر کشوری انجام شده است را آغاز میکنم! این جنگ اقتصادی و انزوا در مقیاسی بیسابقه خواهد بود. نیروی دریاییشان نابود شده، نیروی هواییشان منهدم شده، کارخانههای نظامیشان اکنون به آوا…
بیش از ۱۰ درصد جهانی رشد کرده از ۴۰۰۰ دلار. داخلی هم چندین بار گفته بودم طلای ۱۵ـ۱۶ تومنی و دلار ۱۵۵ تومنی یه فرصت فوقالعاده برای خریده.
@Exdigy
❤23👍9😁2👏1
Signed Mohammad
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @exdigy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,148,247 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بازار مالی | امینیان @Tahlil_aminian · 70,264 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Naeem VIP 🔥 @naeem_trader · 109,402 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Arsalan.eth @arsalaneth · 87,983 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Exdigy” (@exdigy), 16,068 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exdigy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
