اگر میخوای به موقع وارد بازار بشی و به موقع
خارج بشی بهتره که حواست به من باشه 💬
دوستان این سیگنالها صرفا نظر شخصی من و پیشنهادی برای خرید فروش شما نیست و من هیچ مسئولیتی در مورد سود و ضرر شما قبول نمیکنم
عضویت در چنل به معنای قبول کردن قوانین
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -8,381. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86,726–97,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 02:38
87,983
-433
20 Aug 2026, 20:43
88,416
-463
19 Aug 2026, 19:06
88,879
-487
18 Aug 2026, 19:36
89,366
-527
17 Aug 2026, 18:33
89,893
-732
16 Aug 2026, 14:34
90,625
-1,182
14 Aug 2026, 23:44
91,807
-1,513
13 Aug 2026, 15:07
93,320
-947
12 Aug 2026, 14:44
94,267
-253
11 Aug 2026, 16:04
94,520
-276
10 Aug 2026, 19:14
94,796
-401
9 Aug 2026, 15:14
95,197
-375
8 Aug 2026, 13:34
95,572
-347
7 Aug 2026, 14:35
95,919
-332
6 Aug 2026, 14:12
96,251
-113
6 Aug 2026, 07:15
96,364
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:09
96,364
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.67%
avg views ÷ 87,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,870
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
39 (24 July 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
229,030
Reactions total
10,008
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
888
Videos
89
Links
90
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,008 reactions across 39 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,425
74.2%
🔥
1,486
14.8%
👍
639
6.38%
👏
142
1.42%
🤔
70
0.699%
🙏
38
0.38%
🐳
33
0.33%
😢
28
0.28%
👀
23
0.23%
👨💻
21
0.21%
💯
17
0.17%
😁
17
0.17%
🫡
14
0.14%
✍
13
0.13%
🥰
11
0.11%
🤪
10
0.1%
🕊
7
0.07%
🏆
4
0.04%
❤🔥
3
0.03%
🍾
3
0.03%
2 further kinds
4
0.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,008reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
رفقا همونطور که توی پیام قبلی گفتم، پست آخر اینستاگرام رو یه کم هول بدید 😂🔥
خیلی وقت بود پست نزاشته بودم و این یکی برام مهمه ❤️
لایک و کامنت و ریپست یادتون نره و برای چندتا از دوستاتون هم بفرستید 📲
بعدش برمیگردیم سراغ چارتها و میریم برای یک سیگنال دیگه 👀📊🚀
اینستاگرام :
https://www.instagram.com/arsalanfinancial?igsi=MWQ0OXVuaTRkemlsbw==
#SANDUSDT 🚀🔥
SAND هم کار خودش رو کرد 😂
اسپات: ۱۹٪ سود 📈
فیوچرز با اهرم: ۱۹۰٪ سود 💰🔥
از همون اول هم گفتم عجله نکنید و بذارید سناریو خودش رو نشون بده
فعلاً که روز سوم ۲۱ روز رو هم با سود خوب داریم جلو میریم 😬📊
مدیریت سرمایه یادتون نره ❤️
🔖@arsalaneth
پست امشب تازه اولین چارت از اون ۱۰ تا چارت بود که قرار توی این ۲۱ روز باهم بررسی کنیم 👀📊
هر کدومشون هم قرار نیست فقط یه بار بررسی بشه
هر وقت دیتای جدیدی بیاد یا شرایط چارت تغییر کنه، آپدیتشون میکنم 🔥
حالا انرژیها تو دست ببینم دیگه 😬😂
لایک ❤️
ریپست 🔄
و حداقل برای چندتا از دوستاتون هم بفرستید 📤
ویدیو هم بدون استاپ تا اخر ببین تا بفهمی چرا 🫶
بزن بریم برای چارتهای بعدی 🚀📈
🔖@arsalaneth
امروز توی اینستاگرام درباره طلا صحبت میکنم 🥇
ولی چیزی که برای من مهم تره جواب یه سواله
اگر تحلیلم اشتباه باشه از کجا بفهمم؟ 👀
چون به نظرم شروع یک تصمیم خوب این نیست که فقط پیش بینی کنیم قیمت قراره کجا بره
باید بدونیم اگر بازار برخلاف انتظارمون حرکت کرد کجا متوجه میشیم که تحلیلمون دیگه اعتبار نداره
چند ساعت دیگه جزئیات کاملش رو باز میکنم 📊
این بار فقط به قیمت نگاه نکنید
مسیر رو ببینید 🧠
🔖@arsalaneth
یه مشکلی که خیلیاتون دارید اینه که وقتی طلا شروع میکنه شدید رفتن بالا تازه یادتون میفته که باید بخرید 🫤
این دقیقاً همون چیزیه که بهش میگن FOMO
ترس از اینکه جا بمونید
ولی کسی که میخواد منطقی تصمیم بگیره قبل از خرید حداقل دو تا چیز رو چک میکنه 👇
اول
ببینید حباب طلا و سکه نسبت به میانگین تاریخی خودش کجاست
دوم
برای خودتون Invalidation Level مشخص کنید
یعنی اگر خریدید و بازار مثلاً ۵٪ ریخت
دقیقاً قراره چیکار کنید؟
کج…
سلام رفقا 👋🔥
روز دوم از ۲۱ روز رو شروع کنیم؟ 👀📊
روز اول فقط شروع کار بود
از امروز میریم سراغ دیتاها و تحلیلهای جدیتر 🧠📈
مثل همیشه عجله نکنید
اول دلیل و دیتا رو میبینیم، بعد میریم سراغ چارت 🎯
بزن بریم 🚀
🔖@arsalaneth
#SANDUSDT 📊🔥
یک پله سیو سود کردم ✅
استاپ رو هم آوردم روی همون محدودهای که وارد شده بودم
معامله اسپاتم الان حدود ۴٪ توی سود هست 💰
فیوچرز هم حدود ۴۰٪ سود دارم با اهرم ۱۰ 🚀
از اینجا به بعد دیگه بدون ریسک اولیه ادامه میدم و میذارم بازار تصمیم بگیره 👀
مدیریت سرمایه یادتون نره ⚠️
🔖@arsalaneth
🔥84❤61🤔10🙏4😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @arsalaneth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,577,441 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
پویان روحی @thepouyan · 80,674 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arsalan.eth” (@arsalaneth), 87,983 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsalaneth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.